Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 20 Aug 2014 (Wednesday) 03:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

To flash or not to flash, that is the question...

 
vanmidd
Member
216 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Sep 2013
     
Sep 03, 2014 23:02 |  #16

I doubt there are any really world class photographers that never use flash.

Ever seen Jonas Peterson's work? He rarely uses a flash - in fact, I can't recall an image he's shot with one. And American Photo has him in the top 10 in the world.


Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer (external link) & Gold Coast Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Sep 04, 2014 07:54 |  #17

Doesn't this totally miss the point ? There are in fact scenarios for which NOT using a flash will produce unacceptable results. These might be only occasional shots or shots past a certain hour or shots at certain venues--but these situations do occur. I'm certain that when they do arrive, this Jonas dude uses his already developed flash knowledge and pops in that flash. The point ? Even if he rarely uses it, he at least knows how and has the gear to make it happen. I think this should be pre-requisite.

vanmidd wrote in post #17134543 (external link)
Ever seen Jonas Peterson's work? He rarely uses a flash - in fact, I can't recall an image he's shot with one. And American Photo has him in the top 10 in the world.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Sep 04, 2014 08:01 |  #18

The example you give of a wedding for which you didn't need flash doesn't show hardly any reception shots or dancing photos. That's not really representative of most weddings I don't think.

vanmidd wrote in post #17134539 (external link)
nor did I use them for this one:

http://vanmiddleton.co​m …/adrianna-nathan-newrybar (external link)



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vanmidd
Member
216 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Sep 2013
     
Sep 04, 2014 08:03 |  #19

Doesn't this totally miss the point ? There are in fact scenarios for which NOT using a flash will produce unacceptable results. These might be only occasional shots or shots past a certain hour or shots at certain venues--but these situations do occur. I'm certain that when they do arrive, this Jonas dude uses his already developed flash knowledge and pops in that flash. The point ? Even if he rarely uses it, he at least knows how and has the gear to make it happen. I think this should be pre-requisite.

You're right, I read it as "rarely", not "never".


Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer (external link) & Gold Coast Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vanmidd
Member
216 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Sep 2013
     
Sep 04, 2014 08:09 |  #20

The example you give of a wedding for which you didn't need flash doesn't show hardly any reception shots or dancing photos. That's not really representative of most weddings I don't think.

One of the examples - the other one included a reception shot in a dark basement restaurant. (To be fair, there was dance-floor action, or I would have pulled it out).

But my point is that my flash often stays in my bag. I guess it was more a contrarian viewpoint to those suggesting a flash should be used during prep, ceremony, locations reception etc. And sf course I agree that understanding how to use a flash and having them onboard at all times is a must.


Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer (external link) & Gold Coast Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Sep 04, 2014 08:37 |  #21

Your work--it's great--obviously speaks for itself. I'm finding that the more I shoot the more I gravitate toward your viewpoint re: flash usage, mainly because, yes, whipping out the flash and setting up can be harmful, literally, to the possibility for movement and spontaneity. I just fear threads like this one serving as justification (for thread lurkers) to avoid study of how to light when the ambient ain't doing it.

vanmidd wrote in post #17135023 (external link)
One of the examples - the other one included a reception shot in a dark basement restaurant. (To be fair, there was dance-floor action, or I would have pulled it out).

But my point is that my flash often stays in my bag. I guess it was more a contrarian viewpoint to those suggesting a flash should be used during prep, ceremony, locations reception etc. And sf course I agree that understanding how to use a flash and having them onboard at all times is a must.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vanmidd
Member
216 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Sep 2013
     
Sep 04, 2014 08:49 |  #22

I just fear threads like this one serving as justification (for thread lurkers) to avoid study of how to light when the ambient ain't doing it.

Fair point. I guess I'm just trying to add balance to the viewpoint of the first two commenters. I just can't imagine setting up off-camera lights when I show up at the bride's place, and they're getting ready, enjoying themselves, being natural. As soon as that flash starts popping, something's dead. Also, it kills time, which otherwise could be spent sneaking around, trying to catch those special moments.

I'm actually a big fan of good flash work. If I ever do a workshop, it will be with someone like Tony Hoffer, who is a master of artificial light. Amazing stuff.


Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer (external link) & Gold Coast Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
memoriesoftomorrow
Goldmember
3,846 posts
Likes: 293
Joined Nov 2010
     
Sep 04, 2014 08:54 |  #23

I guess I'm a lurker who has no interest in flash other than bouncing it from on camera now and again during the reception. The rest of the time they just act as weights in my bag.

Personally I have no interest (nor need) in learning anything beyond that.


Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Sep 04, 2014 09:49 |  #24

No way you can set up lightstand during the getting ready. I use on camera flash and bounce. If the room is well lit then I will use natural light. So really it depends on what the situation is.

Some rooms have 4 walls and no windows, you need to do something to get dimension.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Sep 04, 2014 10:01 |  #25

^While I don't use a lightstand during getting ready, my assistant carries a monopod with a flash atop it. If I don't need it, it stays off; if I do, I turn it on and she bounces it according to my direction, which she's pretty good at guessing now. If I think the room is too small OR I can bounce well from atop my camera, I'll have her wait outside. As has been stated by Tim and others often, it's very often about quality of light, not quantity. Faster lenses, higher ISOs and lower shutter speeds can't change the quality or direction of the ambient light you happen to find yourself in; and sometimes that light is just unacceptable.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Sep 04, 2014 10:09 |  #26

Christopher Steven b wrote in post #17135210 (external link)
^While I don't use a lightstand during getting ready, my assistant carries a monopod with a flash atop it. If I don't need it, it stays off; if I do, I turn it on and she bounces it according to my direction, which she's pretty good at guessing now. If I think the room is too small OR I can bounce well from atop my camera, I'll have her wait outside. As has been stated by Tim and others often, it's very often about quality of light, not quantity. Faster lenses, higher ISOs and lower shutter speeds can't change the quality or direction of the ambient light you happen to find yourself in; and sometimes that light is just unacceptable.

Totally spot on. An assistant with a monopod works unless you have 8 bridesmaids getting ready in a small hotel room *LOL*


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcap1972
Member
Avatar
171 posts
Likes: 68
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
     
Sep 18, 2014 09:39 |  #27

When you have fast lenses and full frame camera flash becomes a matter of personal style. I use only flash during dancing part of the reception.


Avangard Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Sep 26, 2014 19:28 |  #28

Christopher Steven b wrote in post #17135210 (external link)
Faster lenses, higher ISOs and lower shutter speeds can't change the quality or direction of the ambient light you happen to find yourself in; and sometimes that light is just unacceptable.

Very true. With engagement shoots I can choose the location (scenic) and the time (early morning or evening). Weddings, at least where I shoot, generally take place outdoors during the harshest light of day. Brides get ready in small, dark rooms that are crammed full of clothes, makeup, etc (and don't even get me started on the rooms grooms get stuck with). Without the ability to create nice lighting--or to at least modify extremely harsh lighting--, I'd get the same shots as a typical bridesmaid would, or a wedding guest. As I've said in a dozen or so posts here on POTN, knowing how to use on- and off-camera lighting can actually make photos appear more natural, not less, by replicating how our eyes see the world, not how our cameras do.


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tigerkn
Goldmember
4,119 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 162
Joined Feb 2009
Location: CA
     
Apr 10, 2015 10:27 |  #29

scorpio_e wrote in post #17135188 (external link)
No way you can set up lightstand during the getting ready. I use on camera flash and bounce. If the room is well lit then I will use natural light. So really it depends on what the situation is.

Some rooms have 4 walls and no windows, you need to do something to get dimension.

That is my favorite song, Ed :).


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Gears (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcap1972
Member
Avatar
171 posts
Likes: 68
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
     
Apr 12, 2015 10:16 |  #30

I only use flash during the reception for creative shots. I have two remote speed-lights on light stands and manually mix and adjust their power. It definitely depends on your style. I shoot more documentary way so I don't mind noise in high ISO.


Avangard Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,199 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
To flash or not to flash, that is the question...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1271 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.