Ever seen Jonas Peterson's work? He rarely uses a flash - in fact, I can't recall an image he's shot with one. And American Photo has him in the top 10 in the world.
vanmidd Member 216 posts Likes: 19 Joined Sep 2013 More info | Sep 03, 2014 23:02 | #16 I doubt there are any really world class photographers that never use flash. Ever seen Jonas Peterson's work? He rarely uses a flash - in fact, I can't recall an image he's shot with one. And American Photo has him in the top 10 in the world. Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherStevenb Goldmember 3,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada More info | Sep 04, 2014 07:54 | #17 Doesn't this totally miss the point ? There are in fact scenarios for which NOT using a flash will produce unacceptable results. These might be only occasional shots or shots past a certain hour or shots at certain venues--but these situations do occur. I'm certain that when they do arrive, this Jonas dude uses his already developed flash knowledge and pops in that flash. The point ? Even if he rarely uses it, he at least knows how and has the gear to make it happen. I think this should be pre-requisite. vanmidd wrote in post #17134543 Ever seen Jonas Peterson's work? He rarely uses a flash - in fact, I can't recall an image he's shot with one. And American Photo has him in the top 10 in the world.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherStevenb Goldmember 3,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada More info | Sep 04, 2014 08:01 | #18 The example you give of a wedding for which you didn't need flash doesn't show hardly any reception shots or dancing photos. That's not really representative of most weddings I don't think. vanmidd wrote in post #17134539 nor did I use them for this one: http://vanmiddleton.com …/adrianna-nathan-newrybar
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vanmidd Member 216 posts Likes: 19 Joined Sep 2013 More info | Sep 04, 2014 08:03 | #19 Doesn't this totally miss the point ? There are in fact scenarios for which NOT using a flash will produce unacceptable results. These might be only occasional shots or shots past a certain hour or shots at certain venues--but these situations do occur. I'm certain that when they do arrive, this Jonas dude uses his already developed flash knowledge and pops in that flash. The point ? Even if he rarely uses it, he at least knows how and has the gear to make it happen. I think this should be pre-requisite. You're right, I read it as "rarely", not "never". Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vanmidd Member 216 posts Likes: 19 Joined Sep 2013 More info | Sep 04, 2014 08:09 | #20 The example you give of a wedding for which you didn't need flash doesn't show hardly any reception shots or dancing photos. That's not really representative of most weddings I don't think. One of the examples - the other one included a reception shot in a dark basement restaurant. (To be fair, there was dance-floor action, or I would have pulled it out). Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherStevenb Goldmember 3,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada More info | Sep 04, 2014 08:37 | #21 Your work--it's great--obviously speaks for itself. I'm finding that the more I shoot the more I gravitate toward your viewpoint re: flash usage, mainly because, yes, whipping out the flash and setting up can be harmful, literally, to the possibility for movement and spontaneity. I just fear threads like this one serving as justification (for thread lurkers) to avoid study of how to light when the ambient ain't doing it. vanmidd wrote in post #17135023 One of the examples - the other one included a reception shot in a dark basement restaurant. (To be fair, there was dance-floor action, or I would have pulled it out). But my point is that my flash often stays in my bag. I guess it was more a contrarian viewpoint to those suggesting a flash should be used during prep, ceremony, locations reception etc. And sf course I agree that understanding how to use a flash and having them onboard at all times is a must.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vanmidd Member 216 posts Likes: 19 Joined Sep 2013 More info | Sep 04, 2014 08:49 | #22 I just fear threads like this one serving as justification (for thread lurkers) to avoid study of how to light when the ambient ain't doing it. Fair point. I guess I'm just trying to add balance to the viewpoint of the first two commenters. I just can't imagine setting up off-camera lights when I show up at the bride's place, and they're getting ready, enjoying themselves, being natural. As soon as that flash starts popping, something's dead. Also, it kills time, which otherwise could be spent sneaking around, trying to catch those special moments. Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memoriesoftomorrow Goldmember 3,846 posts Likes: 293 Joined Nov 2010 More info | Sep 04, 2014 08:54 | #23 I guess I'm a lurker who has no interest in flash other than bouncing it from on camera now and again during the reception. The rest of the time they just act as weights in my bag. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 04, 2014 09:49 | #24 No way you can set up lightstand during the getting ready. I use on camera flash and bounce. If the room is well lit then I will use natural light. So really it depends on what the situation is.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherStevenb Goldmember 3,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada More info | Sep 04, 2014 10:01 | #25 ^While I don't use a lightstand during getting ready, my assistant carries a monopod with a flash atop it. If I don't need it, it stays off; if I do, I turn it on and she bounces it according to my direction, which she's pretty good at guessing now. If I think the room is too small OR I can bounce well from atop my camera, I'll have her wait outside. As has been stated by Tim and others often, it's very often about quality of light, not quantity. Faster lenses, higher ISOs and lower shutter speeds can't change the quality or direction of the ambient light you happen to find yourself in; and sometimes that light is just unacceptable.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 04, 2014 10:09 | #26 Christopher Steven b wrote in post #17135210 ^While I don't use a lightstand during getting ready, my assistant carries a monopod with a flash atop it. If I don't need it, it stays off; if I do, I turn it on and she bounces it according to my direction, which she's pretty good at guessing now. If I think the room is too small OR I can bounce well from atop my camera, I'll have her wait outside. As has been stated by Tim and others often, it's very often about quality of light, not quantity. Faster lenses, higher ISOs and lower shutter speeds can't change the quality or direction of the ambient light you happen to find yourself in; and sometimes that light is just unacceptable. Totally spot on. An assistant with a monopod works unless you have 8 bridesmaids getting ready in a small hotel room *LOL*
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcap1972 Member 171 posts Likes: 68 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Toronto More info | Sep 18, 2014 09:39 | #27 When you have fast lenses and full frame camera flash becomes a matter of personal style. I use only flash during dancing part of the reception.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 26, 2014 19:28 | #28 Christopher Steven b wrote in post #17135210 Faster lenses, higher ISOs and lower shutter speeds can't change the quality or direction of the ambient light you happen to find yourself in; and sometimes that light is just unacceptable. Very true. With engagement shoots I can choose the location (scenic) and the time (early morning or evening). Weddings, at least where I shoot, generally take place outdoors during the harshest light of day. Brides get ready in small, dark rooms that are crammed full of clothes, makeup, etc (and don't even get me started on the rooms grooms get stuck with). Without the ability to create nice lighting--or to at least modify extremely harsh lighting--, I'd get the same shots as a typical bridesmaid would, or a wedding guest. As I've said in a dozen or so posts here on POTN, knowing how to use on- and off-camera lighting can actually make photos appear more natural, not less, by replicating how our eyes see the world, not how our cameras do. the site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 10, 2015 10:27 | #29 scorpio_e wrote in post #17135188 No way you can set up lightstand during the getting ready. I use on camera flash and bounce. If the room is well lit then I will use natural light. So really it depends on what the situation is. Some rooms have 4 walls and no windows, you need to do something to get dimension. That is my favorite song, Ed Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcap1972 Member 171 posts Likes: 68 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Toronto More info | Apr 12, 2015 10:16 | #30 I only use flash during the reception for creative shots. I have two remote speed-lights on light stands and manually mix and adjust their power. It definitely depends on your style. I shoot more documentary way so I don't mind noise in high ISO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1271 guests, 147 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||