Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 25 Aug 2014 (Monday) 15:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

SMALL wide prime for Crop Sensor

 
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:23 |  #1

I have been using my Canon 50mm 1.8 on my Crop Sensor when I walk around downtown with my wife. It is way too narrow! I like the size of the 40mm Pancake but that is still too narrow! I use the 50mm bc it was cheap and I dont worry about it as much. I want a wide prime (wider than 40mm) but close to the size of the pancake. Something at least as light as the 50mm 1.8 would be nice. I don't want to spend much (Under $300) bc i will be carrying it around town when we go out or just take a walk around downtown.
I like to take some low angles and get entire buildings in one shot but then be able to turn around and snap one of my wife next to me on the side walk.

Any suggestions? I will most likely get something used. Maybe Canon just needs to start a pancake line of lenses!


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aquaforester
Senior Member
886 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 332
Joined Nov 2011
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:26 |  #2

I just picked up up the 10-18 for my 60D crop. It was $299 new.


Flickr (external link)

Current Gear
Canon 60D, 10-18, 24 Pancake, 60 macro, 70-200 F4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:29 |  #3

aquaforester wrote in post #17117109 (external link)
I just picked up up the 10-18 for my 60D crop. It was $299 new.

Im looking for a prime as compact as possible though.


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:33 |  #4

Heya,

Small wide primes for crop? Nothing will be that size, pancake. Wide, prime and small do not go hand in hand. One of the smaller primes that is kinda wide would be the EF 28mm F1.8. Otherwise, you're not going to be using a prime for what you're talking about. Almost all primes that are even remotely affordable for what you're asking to do, are not wide at all on APS-C. Even if you look at vintage glass, you're not finding wider than 28mm that are small.

So the only prime that will work here that is in your budget, is the Rokinon 14mm F2.8. It's quite wide, very sharp, fast, and will do what you ask, and be a prime with F2.8. It's not small. But no lens is going to be small that you're looking for. Pancakes are always in a certain focal length because of optical mechanics.

The 10-18 STM is in that price range, small but not pancake, and very wide, but slow.
The EF 28mm F1.8 is a relatively small prime, fast, but not really wide, more "normal" on APS-C.
Rokinon 14mm F2.8 does what you want completely. But it's not small.

It will all be a compromise no matter what since you asked for something that frankly doesn't exist. Not even for full frame, I'm afraid (pancake size wide prime).

I had the same issue, so I bought anEOS-M with a 22mm F2 pancake (external link). Small, wide enough (35mm FOV full frame equivalent, not ultrawide, but wide), fast enough for indoors, wide enough for big stuff outside. The whole thing costs less than any lens you're considering, and can be had for around $300 or less. Small system, great for walk around, still uses your other lenses.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aquaforester
Senior Member
886 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 332
Joined Nov 2011
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:33 |  #5

Oh sorry, did't realize you wanted only prime. BTW the 10-18 is pretty small (probably not much bigger than the 50, but doesn't not really an indoor lens.


Flickr (external link)

Current Gear
Canon 60D, 10-18, 24 Pancake, 60 macro, 70-200 F4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:38 |  #6

There's nothing out there the size of a 40mm pancake for an EF camera. The EOS-M has a 22mm f/2 pancake.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:39 |  #7

vengence wrote in post #17117135 (external link)
There's nothing out there the size of a 40mm pancake for an EF camera. The EOS-M has a 22mm f/2 pancake.

I saw that...damnit! lol


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:41 as a reply to  @ BlakeC's post |  #8

I could just lock my Sigma 17-50 2.8 at 17mm and use it but that thing is big, heavy, and too expensive to walk around carefree with!


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chakra99
Junior Member
Avatar
21 posts
Joined Apr 2014
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:42 |  #9

Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens


_______________
Canon 6D, Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC, Canon 70-200 F4 L IS,Canon 70-300,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,008 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5399
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Aug 25, 2014 15:54 |  #10

EF 35/2 (the old one) or the Sigma 30/1.4. The EF is a great lens even wide open and it's tiny. I haven't held the Sigma in person, but I don't think it's much larger and it's a full stop faster and the IQ is even better. Either lens gets you around a 50mm FF equivalent FOV which I find perfect for most scenarios.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
Aug 25, 2014 16:01 |  #11

BlakeC wrote in post #17117143 (external link)
I could just lock my Sigma 17-50 2.8 at 17mm and use it but that thing is big, heavy, and too expensive to walk around carefree with!

Well, the big and heavy could be solved with an EF 28 f/2.8, but it's going to be in the same price range as your sigma. You've also got the 24 f/2.8 & 35 f/2 which are similar in size, albeit a little larger & heavier.

Have you considered a pocket camera like the S120 or RX 100 ii? You'll IQ, DoF, & FoV around that of a rebel & kit lens, but in something that's the size of a cell phone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Aug 25, 2014 17:47 |  #12

The 10-18 is pretty small and very light weight. Not a prime, but small and wide.
The Sigma 30 1.4A is a pretty compact lens but more of a standard view on a crop.

I went with a mirrorless for my walk around stuff for much less size and weight while keeping the IQ.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeeRatters
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,903 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9567
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Aug 25, 2014 17:51 |  #13

I have the 50/1.4 [not much bigger than your 50/1.8] & the 28/1.8 & in all honesty there is very little difference in size & weight.


>> Flickr << (external link)


>> Instagram<< (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Aug 25, 2014 18:18 |  #14

The only lenses that come close to what you're looking for are the canon 28mm f1.8, sigma 30mm f1.4, and canon 35mm f2. But even those are bigger and more expensive then what you're looking for and even 28mm on a crop is not "wide".




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Aug 25, 2014 19:27 |  #15

35f2 is pretty much the exact same size as the 50mm f1.8, and it'll fall under $300...the question is if 35mm is wide enough for you

the eos-m with 22mm could be bought for less than $300 as well...but not sure if that's what you're after...personally for me, i find the 22mm is just too wide for walk arounds, i still use it, but i wish it would've been a bit longer, i prefer 35mm on my 70D


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,650 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
SMALL wide prime for Crop Sensor
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1396 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.