brian4646 wrote in post #17118460
I'm thinking of buying a full frame camera. I know the advantages I will probably see by doing so. My question is for those that switch to full frame using prime lenses, did you have to sell your primes that you were used to when you switched and buy different ones? I like the 35mm and 85mm on my crop. Will I want a 50mm and 135mm when I buy a full frame camera?
brian4646 wrote in post #17118482
Portraits of my family is what I shoot.
Heya,
I shoot both full frame & APS-C. I use the same primes on both. Doesn't matter which you use, it just changes your physical distance to them for the same field of view. Minor difference in depth of field due to that. No other real advantage, if doing portrait, if you're not seeking the thinnest depth of field possible.
Here's Full Frame & APS-C, 85mm each, F2, F1.8, F1.4 to give you an idea of how different the depth of field is. Since again, the only real difference is physical distance to subject based on field of view and composition:
Guess which is which before looking at EXIF.
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/nkWzdB
IMG_0471
by
Mwise1023
, on Flickr
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oURweU
IMG_9026
by
Mwise1023
, on Flickr
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/nXMk7w
IMG_5370
by
Mwise1023
, on Flickr
If you're objective about it, you'll find that full frame for portrait is really not that different, and certainly not worth an overhaul.
I only shoot full frame for portrait because I use manual lenses, and I appreciate the viewfinder of an old $350 5D and the thinnest depth of field possible and it's EE-S matte screen that makes manual focus easy as pie (it's a lot harder to do manual focus via viewfinder on crops due to focus screens and viewfinder sizes; live view however makes that not a problem, but I don't like live view out in the sun).
Very best,