Oh I see you sig shows the 85 1.8 so I guess you already made the choice.
FarmerTed1971 fondling the 5D4 More info | Oh I see you sig shows the 85 1.8 so I guess you already made the choice. Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Sep 01, 2014 12:02 | #17 if you're shooting anything older than 6 year old kids sports, you're going to come up short a large majority of the time even with 135mm Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 01, 2014 12:04 | #18 DreDaze wrote in post #17129516 if you're shooting anything older than 6 year old kids sports, you're going to come up short a large majority of the time even with 135mm people may notice you have a big lens, but it's not like they're going to sit there and stare at you...yeah you might get a couple attempts at glancing at it when you're not looking... I get looked at with my 120-300 or when I had the 300 2.8 IS. I don't care I and when they make comments I just say thank you and continue on with what I'm doing. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 01, 2014 22:01 | #19 Many thanks for all the helpful replies! Yes, I did go for the 85/1.8 in the end. It should be here later this week, and I'm super excited. I definitely plan on adding a 135L to my kit in the future, and maybe then I'll sell the 85 depending on whats being used more often? I also want to go for the 70-300/4-5.6L too and re-acquiring the 35/2 IS. But alas, those will have to be part of next year's photo budget. Again, thanks everyone.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
InfiniteDivide "I wish to be spared" More info | Sep 02, 2014 00:32 | #20 ^ I don't think you need the 35mm at all, while it is nice, James Patrus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ShallowDoF Senior Member 416 posts Likes: 880 Joined Sep 2013 Location: Australia More info | The 135 provides a "magic" that all the other lenses I have tried can NOT provide. My opinion of course!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2014 11:44 | #22 135, 100, 85, in that order. Both 85 and 100 are fine lenses, but don't offer the contrast of the 135. 135 is a good amount of reach, where the 85 is outright short outdoors. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1115 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||