Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Sep 2014 (Saturday) 21:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Ever wondered how strong your lens mount is?

 
frankchn
Senior Member
460 posts
Likes: 160
Joined Jun 2009
     
Sep 06, 2014 21:35 |  #1

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/8B78opb.jpg

That's a 400mm f/2.8L IS II (8.5 pounds with the majority of the weight near the front of the lens) held by a 5D Mark III. Also demonstrates the strength of the tripod mount, plate and ball head :lol:



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,842 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 6006
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Sep 07, 2014 03:45 |  #2

now just add a piece of straw to the front of the lens...


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,360 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1836
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Sep 07, 2014 03:52 |  #3

I think they didn't attach a tripod mount to the lens for nothing.... :) Also in panning it assures the focal centre is more close that of the lens than the camera.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nellyle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,228 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 292
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
Sep 07, 2014 03:58 |  #4

You're a brave man, my 500 weighs about the same and there's no way I'd but that stress on the mount!


5D3, 7D2, 1D3, 40D, 14 f2.8 Samyang, 17-40 L, 28-80 L, 70-200 2.8ii L, 200 2.8ii L, 200-400 L, 1.4 ii,
http://chris-stamp.smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reservoir ­ Dog
A Band Apart
Avatar
3,422 posts
Gallery: 487 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 658
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Out of the pack
     
Sep 07, 2014 04:44 |  #5

Why you don't try with the 1200 f/5.6 USM ?


Patrice
150 Free online photos editing application (external link) / 100 Free Desktop Photo Editor Software (external link) / Free Photography eBooks (external link) / My photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Sep 07, 2014 05:02 |  #6

joeseph wrote in post #17139924 (external link)
now just add a piece of straw to the front of the lens...

Lol

It's not the mount that I'd be worried about, but wha it's screwed into. I could envision those screws pulling out from where the mount attaches to the body.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 07, 2014 05:47 |  #7

I really don't understand why one would mount a camera that way?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
panicatnabisco
Senior Member
Avatar
972 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 329
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Mountain View, CA
     
Sep 07, 2014 06:24 |  #8

the lens mount IS part of the chassis, so yeah its pretty strong


Canon 1DX III | 1DX | 6D II | 6D | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.8 | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 85/1.4 IS | 100/2.8 IS macro | 200mm f/2 | 400/2.8 IS II | 2xIII
Leica M8.2 | Noctilux 50 f/1 | Elmarit 90/2.8
afimages.net (external link) | Facebook (external link) | instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Echo63
Goldmember
Avatar
2,868 posts
Likes: 169
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Perth - Western Australia - Earth
     
Sep 07, 2014 06:29 as a reply to  @ panicatnabisco's post |  #9

It might not break, but you may well have bent something !

If your camera suddenly develops a very mild "tilt-shift" type effect, you have certainly damaged it.


My Best Imageswww.echo63.deviantart.​com (external link)
Gear listhttps://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2463426&pos​tcount=385

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Sep 07, 2014 07:06 |  #10

Of course it will hold it. But after a while it can cause real bad things to happen to the mount.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Sep 07, 2014 07:26 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

Proof positive that just because you can, doesn't mean you should.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Sep 07, 2014 08:10 |  #12

I took the lens mount off of my 3 pound 100-400 years ago. It works fine without it on my 7D. (But it's not near as heavy as your 400 2.8.. That is impressive :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,842 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 6006
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Sep 07, 2014 20:17 |  #13

panicatnabisco wrote in post #17140019 (external link)
the lens mount IS part of the chassis

only by virtue of 4 small screws... the top ones especially!


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Sep 07, 2014 20:29 |  #14

This is obviously not how the gear should be fitted to the tripod because of the huge imbalance making it very hard to work with.

But he mount has to be made very strong for the single reason that when the gear isn't on the tripod, then it has to support being carried which includes the stress of every footstep. And when people are hand-holding, they might sometimes need to get their left hand free to do something, in which case the lens mount has to take the weight.

The important thing here is that the mount should be able to support this static weight without damage. But it has quite limited safety marging for additional bumps. Let's say you losen the tripod head and the lens/camera suddenly falls forward until it reaches some stop. That will result in a huge impulse force on the mount. And then all bets are off.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Avo
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Aug 2014
     
Sep 08, 2014 02:34 |  #15

Even if the mount looks fine it may develop microscopic cracks and fissures. This is called metal fatigue:
http://en.wikipedia.or​g/wiki/Metal_Fatigue (external link)

In the past, some air tragedy happened due to the fact that this phenomenon was not well understood at the time.

So looks fine doesn't mean its fine.


5D Mark III, Sony A7R
EF24-70 f/2.8 II, EF70-200 f/2.8 IS II, Sigma 35 f/1.4
SEL35F28, SEL55F18

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,913 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Ever wondered how strong your lens mount is?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1577 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.