Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 Sep 2014 (Wednesday) 22:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yet another WB question...

 
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 10, 2014 22:07 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Hi, all,

I'm having the hardest time figuring out the WB in CO 7. I've a number of questions:

What would the best approach for the WB be? In the camera: Daylight throughout (I hear Daylight records the light as is, no bias), or Custom (set to the flash's temperature: ~5650K)? Or use a colour card and set in Capture One?

Here are two series of images (well the same image, different settings), the first one edited in CO and the second one in LR. For some reason the photos look quite greenish to me (yes, my monitor is calibrated). Can I ask you which one do you find most pleasing/accurate? The one with the best skin tones?

CO 7: http://diamantstudios.​ca/Gemeines/MG_WB1/ind​ex.htm (external link)

LR 3.3: http://diamantstudios.​ca/Gemeines/MG_WB_LR3/​index.html (external link)

TIA


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Sep 10, 2014 22:36 |  #2

Alveric wrote in post #17147125 (external link)
For some reason the photos look quite greenish to me (yes, my monitor is calibrated).

I think they could use a little more red. (Magenta is the opposite of green.)
The "correct" WB isn't always the right" WB? Don't be afraid of fudging it a bit if you think the shot looks better. ;)


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redcrown
Senior Member
351 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Dec 2008
     
Sep 11, 2014 16:57 |  #3

Best approach to setting "accurate" white balance is to shoot a reference frame with a color card like your Passport. Better than using presets (like Daylight, Flash, Cloudy). Better than visual swags.

But consider that after WB is set in a raw converter, the camera profile is applied. Different profiles will yield different colors (skin tones) under the same WB setting. Colors will also change a little as tonal adjustments are made.

With skin tones, look at the "by the numbers" approach. Using either CMYK or LAB values is best. The common rule for CMYK values is Cyan 1/5 to 1/3 of Magenta and Yellow "slightly" greater than Magenta. How much greater is a matter of personal taste. That's where reality goes out the window.

In your samples, the skin tone yellows average 15 points greater than magenta on both the CO7 and LR "color card" shot. That's a lot of yellow, but given the truly neutral patches on the color card, I'd say that's the natural tone of the model.

The cyan/magenta ratio is much lower on the CO7 shot than it is on the LR shot. That is because of the different profiles. However, that cyan/magenta ratio is far less important than the magenta/yellow ratio. I think the best approach to portraits is to start with an accurate WB in raw conversion (via color card), and then adjust the only the skin tones to taste. If you try to use WB alone to set skin tones to a target, the rest of the colors may be way off.

Taste varies, and varies widely. So when you ask people which is "best", be prepared for widely different answers.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 11, 2014 17:13 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Thanks for the replies. In this case, I also think that the make-up made a big difference. Take a look at the hands: they're a totally different colour than her face.

It can be seen better in this series: http://diamantstudios.​ca/Gemeines/MG_WB2/ind​ex.htm (external link)


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

895 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Yet another WB question...
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1650 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.