Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 12 Sep 2014 (Friday) 10:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

SanDisk release the largest size card ever

 
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Sep 12, 2014 10:26 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Well, for the time being

http://www.bbc.co.uk/n​ews/technology-29175093 (external link)
and for those who can't go on the BBC for whatever reasons
http://www.theverge.co​m …-the-biggest-in-the-world (external link)

Coming in at a whopping 512Gb, mainly aimed to the 4K video shooters rather that still photographers, but....nothing is there to stop anyone buying it for themselves, lol




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bps
Cream of the Crop
7,607 posts
Likes: 406
Joined Mar 2007
Location: California
     
Sep 12, 2014 10:52 |  #2

It's hard to imagine, but this size will be commonplace for the everyday user within the next 5-8 years!

Bryan


My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Sep 12, 2014 11:09 |  #3

Here I was imagining a 12-18" memory card, still looks the same size to me:D


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Sep 12, 2014 11:10 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

maverick75 wrote in post #17150156 (external link)
Here I was imagining a 12-18" memory card, still looks the same size to me:D


Ha! I meant capacity:cool:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RMH
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canterbury
     
Sep 12, 2014 12:02 |  #5

imaging loosing 512GB of files :S



All the stuff I've owned at one time or another

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Sep 12, 2014 12:23 |  #6

RMH wrote in post #17150232 (external link)
imaging loosing 512GB of files :S

But a large number of people do just that every day. Just that they manage to do it by not having a proper backup of their hard disks.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaputreThis
Junior Member
22 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: city of wind
     
Sep 12, 2014 15:48 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban
SPAM PUT AWAY
This post is marked as spam.
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 13, 2014 00:46 |  #8

bps wrote in post #17150113 (external link)
It's hard to imagine, but this size will be commonplace for the everyday user within the next 5-8 years!

Bryan

I believe so, especially if video advances to the point where we have 80 or 100 FPS, and every frame is a 30 megapixel raw file.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ricsha
Member
110 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Central Oregon Coast
     
Sep 13, 2014 00:58 |  #9

I see that the 512GB SDXC card will initially retail for a whopping $799. Having just put a 32GB card through the laundry a couple of weeks ago (without apparent damage), I don't think I could be trusted with an eight-hundred dollar card the size of a postage stamp. Too easy to leave one in a pocket, as I discovered too late.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nogo
POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban"
9,193 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 685
Joined Dec 2013
Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS)
     
Sep 13, 2014 01:10 |  #10

Just think, that is a UHS speed class 1 card. Wonder what they will charge for the UHS speed class 3 card?


Philip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Sep 13, 2014 05:57 |  #11

RMH wrote in post #17150232 (external link)
imaging loosing 512GB of files :S

Quote from 2001 "Imagine losing 512MB of files".


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Overread
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
Sep 13, 2014 18:37 |  #12

Reminds me of when I got my first laptop - I think it had something like 4GB and I was told reliably by the retailer that I'd NEVER use that much space up fully ever. (It might have been more - all I can recall is I had to uninstall almost everything extra to get Diablo 2 to install)

Thing is whilst the storage sizes go up so too do the save sizes. Photos are getting huge (esp in RAW) with higher and higher MP values and video is even bigger still. Computer games are also going the same way, 500mb was a rough commonish value when I started - now 20GB is not out of the question for a single game.

A card like this is insane today unless you're doing a lot of video or travelling long distance with power, but no download access (also a rarity in todays market). But I wouldn't be surprised if in half to a decade of time that we are starting to think of them as quite sane (I recall those 32GB cards being questioned as to the sanity of having that much storage space - today many of us already own or would like to own them).


All I can think of is that Darn if Nintendo get a hold of that tech we'll get some HUGE games on the DS! :)


Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RMH
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canterbury
     
Sep 13, 2014 19:19 |  #13

Overread wrote in post #17152559 (external link)
Reminds me of when I got my first laptop - I think it had something like 4GB and I was told reliably by the retailer that I'd NEVER use that much space up fully ever. (It might have been more - all I can recall is I had to uninstall almost everything extra to get Diablo 2 to install)

Thing is whilst the storage sizes go up so too do the save sizes. Photos are getting huge (esp in RAW) with higher and higher MP values and video is even bigger still. Computer games are also going the same way, 500mb was a rough commonish value when I started - now 20GB is not out of the question for a single game.

A card like this is insane today unless you're doing a lot of video or travelling long distance with power, but no download access (also a rarity in todays market). But I wouldn't be surprised if in half to a decade of time that we are starting to think of them as quite sane (I recall those 32GB cards being questioned as to the sanity of having that much storage space - today many of us already own or would like to own them).


All I can think of is that Darn if Nintendo get a hold of that tech we'll get some HUGE games on the DS! :)

HA, my first PC with a hard disk was 40MB

Before that is was all 360k floppy disks. and before that tapes (not on PC tho)....



All the stuff I've owned at one time or another

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Johnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,398 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 488
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Virginia
     
Sep 13, 2014 19:24 |  #14

Sounds cool, but I'd rather have multiple smaller cards than one $800 card that is easy to lose, or heaven forbid, goes corrupt.


_______________
Ain't Nature Grand!
Shooting 7D2 with Canon 400mm, f/5.6.
60D, canon 18-135 EFS, and 1.4 extender in the bag.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 13, 2014 22:30 |  #15

RMH wrote in post #17152600 (external link)
HA, my first PC with a hard disk was 40MB

Before that is was all 360k floppy disks. and before that tapes (not on PC tho)....

Yeah, back in "the day", IBM PCs and all that jazz, except my first hard drive was I think 10MB, and of course what was the RAM in those old machines, 640K max?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,070 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
SanDisk release the largest size card ever
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1472 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.