Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Sep 2014 (Monday) 11:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!

 
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 17, 2018 19:32 |  #20101

britain wrote in post #18710172 (external link)
I'm stumped. The Coppers eyes are yellow this ones red and made sounds like a red shoulder. How can you tell? After a bit more research eye color changes when they get older from yellow to a dark brown. So I have a younger and a mature Copper.

I'm thinking Sharp-shinned...


https://www.allaboutbi​rds.org/guide/Sharp-shinned_Hawk (external link)


Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
britain
Senior Member
Avatar
917 posts
Gallery: 280 photos
Likes: 2015
Joined Jun 2005
Location: El Centro Calif
     
Sep 17, 2018 19:40 |  #20102

Pondrader wrote in post #18710183 (external link)
I'm thinking Sharp-shinned...

https://www.allaboutbi​rds.org/guide/Sharp-shinned_Hawk (external link)

Well, that's a dead ringer there! More info for research. Thanks!


7D2, 20D , 100-400L I, 100-400L II, EFS 17-85 , EFS 18-135, EFS 10-18mm, 100 2.8 macro , ring light, 430EX II, PD Capture Pro, Lifted modified Jeep to shake it all up:)

My Website HERE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
Post edited over 5 years ago by Pondrader. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 17, 2018 19:45 |  #20103

.... 7DII is dead............... long live the 7DII

Three strikes..... then I'm out..

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/09/3/LQ_933737.jpg
Image hosted by forum (933737) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Yes I got a warranty  :p:-D

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/09/3/LQ_933791.jpg
Image hosted by forum (933791) © Pondrader [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lame-Duck
I have indeed had pine nuts
Avatar
25,648 posts
Gallery: 1251 photos
Likes: 62545
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Fresno, California
     
Sep 17, 2018 20:33 |  #20104

britain wrote in post #18710172 (external link)
I'm stumped. The Coppers eyes are yellow this ones red and made sounds like a red shoulder. How can you tell? After a bit more research eye color changes when they get older from yellow to a dark brown. So I have a younger and a mature Copper.

Eye color is not really reliable because it changes from juvenile to adult.Cooper's hawks eyes change from yellow to red, and red-shouldered hawks eyes change from yellow to a brown color.

Cooper's hawks have a dark colored cap on their heads while red-shouldered hawks do not. There are many distinguishing color features that you can see if you google both hawks and look at their pictures. I will say that red-shouldered hawks appear much redder in color than do Cooper's hawks, but that just one of the things that I notice.


LD, or Mike
Often mistaken, but never in doubt.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lame-Duck
I have indeed had pine nuts
Avatar
25,648 posts
Gallery: 1251 photos
Likes: 62545
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Fresno, California
     
Sep 17, 2018 21:06 |  #20105

Pondrader wrote in post #18710183 (external link)
I'm thinking Sharp-shinned...

https://www.allaboutbi​rds.org/guide/Sharp-shinned_Hawk (external link)

It certainly could be a sharp-shinned hawk, Jeff. Their coloration is the same as a Cooper's hawk; they are just a smaller bird. It's hard to tell from a photo how large the bird is. During my younger years I was a practicing falconer (actually an austringer since I flew hawks and not falcons). I've kept both Cooper's hawks and sharp-shinned hawks, and there is a noticeable difference in their size. Not only that, but the females are substantially larger than the males. All these factors make it difficult to tell for sure whether it is a sharp-shinned or a Cooper's hawk.


LD, or Mike
Often mistaken, but never in doubt.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ Dawe
Goldmember
Avatar
2,551 posts
Gallery: 367 photos
Likes: 7614
Joined Jul 2008
Location: UK
Post edited over 5 years ago by Jack Dawe. (4 edits in all)
     
Sep 17, 2018 21:07 |  #20106

Lame-Duck wrote in post #18710160 (external link)
Britain...very nice bathing series, but in this case I believe it is a Cooper's hawk, and not a red-shouldered hawk.

Yep, I agree. Red-shouldered Hawk is a buteo, so belongs to the same family as the Red-tailed Hawk. It would have the same general "feel" about it and would show more white markings in the wings than we see here. (British birders use the term "jizz" to describe this general impression, but I wouldn't recommend Googling that.) This bird gives the somewhat more slender impression of an accipiter, which on your side of the pond means Sharp-shinned or Cooper's Hawk. These can be a real pain to distinguish, although in flight I've found the longer tail of Cooper's a good pointer. No use in these photos though. This is an adult male and the eye is deep red in both species. The eye is quite forward and close to the bill. In Sharp-shinned Hawk the eye is a bit further back and there's more of an angle between the forehead and the bill, so I'm inclined to call this bird a Cooper's - but I'm far from 100% sure, especially since the thin white tips to the tail feathers in the last photo would favour Sharp-shinned. It's definitely one or the other though!

Edit: Actually, the more I look at this, the more I'm thinking Sharp-shinned.


Canon 7D2 · 16-35 f/4L IS · 17-55 f/2.8 IS · 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM · 50 f/1.8 · 100 f/2.8 Macro · 100-400L IS II
Picture editing is OK. CC always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lame-Duck
I have indeed had pine nuts
Avatar
25,648 posts
Gallery: 1251 photos
Likes: 62545
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Fresno, California
     
Sep 17, 2018 21:15 |  #20107

Jack Dawe wrote in post #18710240 (external link)
Yep, I agree. Red-shouldered Hawk is a buteo, so belongs to the same family as the Red-tailed Hawk. It would have the same general "feel" about it and would show more white markings in the wings than we see here. (British birders use the term "jizz" to describe this general impression, but I wouldn't recommend Googling that.) This bird gives the somewhat more slender impression of an accipiter, which on your side of the pond means Sharp-shinned or Cooper's Hawk. These can be a real pain to distinguish, although in flight I've found the longer tail of Cooper's a good pointer. No use in these photos though. This is an adult male and the eye is deep red in both species. The eye is quite forward and close to the bill. In Sharp-shinned Hawk the eye is a bit further back and there's more of an angle between the forehead and the bill, so I'm inclined to call this bird a Cooper's - but I'm far from 100% sure. It's one of the two though!

Jack you are definitely better informed than I am. I bow to your knowledge on the subject. I don't see sharp-shinned hawks nearly as often as Cooper's hawks, so my first thought is Cooper's. I'm sure I misidentify the two frequently. :oops:


LD, or Mike
Often mistaken, but never in doubt.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ Dawe
Goldmember
Avatar
2,551 posts
Gallery: 367 photos
Likes: 7614
Joined Jul 2008
Location: UK
Post edited over 5 years ago by Jack Dawe.
     
Sep 17, 2018 21:27 |  #20108

Lame-Duck wrote in post #18710249 (external link)
Jack you are definitely better informed than I am. I bow to your knowledge on the subject. I don't see sharp-shinned hawks nearly as often as Cooper's hawks, so my first thought is Cooper's. I'm sure I misidentify the two frequently. :oops:

Mike, I'm entirely the wrong side of the pond to pontificate about these two species and I'm sure you know more than I do! :) We have just two accipiters in the UK, the Sparrowhawk and the Goshawk. Our Goshawk is the same species as yours and our Sparrowhawk is virtually identical in size and shape to your Sharp-shinned. That's my yardstick. Cooper's lies in between the two, with a longer tail. I'm now pretty sure that Britain's photos are of a Sharp-shinned.


Canon 7D2 · 16-35 f/4L IS · 17-55 f/2.8 IS · 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM · 50 f/1.8 · 100 f/2.8 Macro · 100-400L IS II
Picture editing is OK. CC always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
britain
Senior Member
Avatar
917 posts
Gallery: 280 photos
Likes: 2015
Joined Jun 2005
Location: El Centro Calif
Post edited over 5 years ago by britain. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 17, 2018 21:50 |  #20109

Well, The hawk is about 18 inches from feet to head. Never noticed but they also have a protective eye covering.

IMAGE: http://icorva.com/PHOTOS/2018F/HAWK2/H18.JPG

IMAGE: http://icorva.com/PHOTOS/2018F/HAWK2/H19.JPG

7D2, 20D , 100-400L I, 100-400L II, EFS 17-85 , EFS 18-135, EFS 10-18mm, 100 2.8 macro , ring light, 430EX II, PD Capture Pro, Lifted modified Jeep to shake it all up:)

My Website HERE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
burnet44
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,984 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 14532
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Robinson, Texas
     
Sep 17, 2018 21:52 |  #20110

Get off of me

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/09/3/LQ_933753.jpg
Image hosted by forum (933753) © burnet44 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
C and C welcome, Brutality Encouraged, Help Always Welcome Editing OK
www.firstdownphotos.ph​otoreflect.com (external link)
Flicker Page http://www.flickr.com/​photos/72506283@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lame-Duck
I have indeed had pine nuts
Avatar
25,648 posts
Gallery: 1251 photos
Likes: 62545
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Post edited over 5 years ago by Lame-Duck.
     
Sep 17, 2018 23:20 |  #20111

Jack Dawe wrote in post #18710260 (external link)
Mike, I'm entirely the wrong side of the pond to pontificate about these two species and I'm sure you know more than I do! :) We have just two accipiters in the UK, the Sparrowhawk and the Goshawk. Our Goshawk is the same species as yours and our Sparrowhawk is virtually identical in size and shape to your Sharp-shinned. That's my yardstick. Copper's lies in between the two, with a longer tail. I'm now pretty sure that Britain's photos are of a Sharp-shinned.

If I was a betting man, I'd put my money on you, Jack. :-D


LD, or Mike
Often mistaken, but never in doubt.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ Dawe
Goldmember
Avatar
2,551 posts
Gallery: 367 photos
Likes: 7614
Joined Jul 2008
Location: UK
     
Sep 18, 2018 02:22 |  #20112

britain wrote in post #18710274 (external link)
Well, The hawk is about 18 inches from feet to head. Never noticed but they also have a protective eye covering.

QUOTED IMAGE
QUOTED IMAGE

It's called the nictitating membrane. It helps keep the eye moist and protects it from dust and other nasties.


Canon 7D2 · 16-35 f/4L IS · 17-55 f/2.8 IS · 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM · 50 f/1.8 · 100 f/2.8 Macro · 100-400L IS II
Picture editing is OK. CC always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aladyforty
Goldmember
Avatar
4,355 posts
Gallery: 398 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 7463
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Albany: Western Australia
Post edited over 5 years ago by aladyforty. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 18, 2018 02:24 |  #20113

Pondrader wrote in post #18709263 (external link)
Well yes.. There is no one answer that covers everyone. I have spent so much time this last year on this question. I have high hopes they will still build our 7DIII with all the bells and whistles... But I have a gut feeling that said other wise. So ... what is the answer. its different for everyone. I love a crop.. would like to have a full frame sensor but im sure I would miss the reach.

I'm not sure of the colour problems you have seen but I have seen zero colour issues with the sonys. Theres a few cameras I dont get exactly what Im liking but thats what LR and PS are for. From what I'm reading and seeing the adapters are about seamless and not to be confused with the days of old. Truth is they all have something we don't like... even the ones we do like.

I've tried to keep an open mind as i figure out where i should go between now and the next big wildlife camera from Canon. used a lot of camera's...

I've gone the last year with a camera I could not adjust correctly.. that was just nuts. Not ever doing that again. I'm going to put a limit on how long I keep my cameras from now on.

I need a big bucket that money falls into regularly the has written on it.. Camera Fund..KEEP OUT.... keep it somewhere the grand kids cant find it.


well to be fair Im talking skin tones, seen the colour compared to canon and was like yuk. for landscape and other Id probably not notice. also not keen on the ergonomics, If i had to choose another brand Id go Fuji but unsure what they have available that would be suitable for birding, then of course there is Nikon. I hope they bring out a new model in the 7D series, Id probably go to the next model if it was worth it. So far though my 7DII has been a gem, rained on, covered in salty water, never misses a beat. Has been a total workhorse


FUJI XT5 + XT3 & a bunch of Fuji lenses, Mavic Air2 drone
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/25426422@N00/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Dexs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,875 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 920
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Crete Greece.
     
Sep 18, 2018 02:55 |  #20114

Pondrader wrote in post #18710192 (external link)
.... 7DII is dead............... long live the 7DII

Three strikes..... then I'm out..
Hosted photo: posted by Pondrader in
./showthread.php?p=187​10192&i=i121852911
forum: Canon Digital Cameras


Yes I got a warranty  :p:-D

HOSTED PHOTO DISPLAY FAILED: ATTACH id 933738 has been deleted. ]

That is a shame Jeff, you and it have taken some wonderful shots. Mine has been repaired, was just a dodgy battery contact. All I need now is my plaster cast taking off my wrist:-P


Canon R6 II, RF 800mm.
I like what I like.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 18, 2018 03:58 |  #20115

Lame-Duck wrote in post #18710319 (external link)
If I was a betting man, I'd put my money on you, Jack. :-D


Jack Dawe wrote in post #18710359 (external link)
It's called the nictitating membrane. It helps keep the eye moist and protects it from dust and other nasties.

I always go with jack's diagnosis.... The man just knows his stuff lol


Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,935,319 views & 103,894 likes for this thread, 718 members have posted to it and it is followed by 366 members.
-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1907 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.