Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Sep 2014 (Monday) 11:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!

 
Lupo-Lobo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,103 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 420
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Texas
     
Feb 01, 2015 01:12 as a reply to  @ post 17409581 |  #3691

Wow - I have never seen an Osprey look so good. Absolutely stunning photography.


Lupo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ancientone80
Senior Member
Avatar
648 posts
Gallery: 498 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 947
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Perth, Western Australia
     
Feb 01, 2015 01:24 |  #3692

Lupo-Lobo wrote in post #17409592 (external link)
Wow - I have never seen an Osprey look so good. Absolutely stunning photography.

Thanks Lupo-Lobo, they really are stunning creatures.

Cheers
Gus


Canon 7D II, 650D | Canon EF-S 10-22, EF-S 17-55/2.8, EF-S 18-135 STM, 100-400L IS II, 70-200L IS II, 50/1.4, 100/2.8 IS Macro | Canon MT-24EX, Speedlite 600EX-RT
Image Editing Ok..
See more at my Flicker site :) flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Efstratios
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Dec 2014
     
Feb 01, 2015 15:52 |  #3693

Those of you who have owned a 1D4, if weight wasn't an issue, would you say the image quality at higher iso's is better than the 7D2? I returned my 7D2 because I found most of my images came out soft even in good light with a high shutter speed. I'm wondering if a 1D4 might do better.

So I had purchased a 7D2 but ultimately returned it. The image quality in good to decent light was better than my old 70D and a touch better than my 1D3, but I wasn't really happy with how the autofocus performed in low light conditions and most images came out soft in even good light. I'm starting to think that I should get a nice used 1D4 which I'm seeing going on EBay for around $1900. I love the ergonomics of my 1D3, way more than the 7D2.

My main concern with the 1D4 is that it's focus points are cross type for f2.8 whereas for the 7D2 all are cross type at 5.6 and I'll be using either a Canon 100-400 II or a Tamron 150-600 which of course are not fast lenses. So then will the 7D2 focus better with the type of lenses I'll be using or is it possible that the 1D4 will focus better despite not being cross type at f5.6? This concerns me because I wasn't really happy with how the 7D2 performed even in bright light.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butterfly2937
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,150 posts
Gallery: 378 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1477
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by butterfly2937.
     
Feb 01, 2015 16:57 |  #3694

Efstratios wrote in post #17410613 (external link)
Those of you who have owned a 1D4, if weight wasn't an issue, would you say the image quality at higher iso's is better than the 7D2? I returned my 7D2 because I found most of my images came out soft even in good light with a high shutter speed. I'm wondering if a 1D4 might do better.

So I had purchased a 7D2 but ultimately returned it. The image quality in good to decent light was better than my old 70D and a touch better than my 1D3, but I wasn't really happy with how the autofocus performed in low light conditions and most images came out soft in even good light. I'm starting to think that I should get a nice used 1D4 which I'm seeing going on EBay for around $1900. I love the ergonomics of my 1D3, way more than the 7D2.

My main concern with the 1D4 is that it's focus points are cross type for f2.8 whereas for the 7D2 all are cross type at 5.6 and I'll be using either a Canon 100-400 II or a Tamron 150-600 which of course are not fast lenses. So then will the 7D2 focus better with the type of lenses I'll be using or is it possible that the 1D4 will focus better despite not being cross type at f5.6? This concerns me because I wasn't really happy with how the 7D2 performed even in bright light.

I have owned the 1D4 since 2011 the focus and low light performance are excellent. I have not owned the 7D2 out of choice. I did own the prior 7D and it was OK but the 1D4 is in another league and I loved it after the 1st minutes of using it. The AF is accurate and the ISO very good to ISO 12,800; you can check out my Flickr page for tons of examples. The inconsistantcies being reported from so many experienced 1D and 1D4 and 5D3 users are the reasons I have chosen to wait and see what the future holds. You will never be disappointed with a 1D4.


_______________
flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Efstratios
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Dec 2014
     
Feb 01, 2015 18:05 as a reply to  @ butterfly2937's post |  #3695

Even if I only use f/5.6 lenses for wildlife?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Feb 01, 2015 18:18 |  #3696

I believe there were ups and downs with some of the owners of the 7DmarkII, There is certainly a major learning curve of which I'm not sure we are through and not having the codec sure didn't help but don't cast doubt on the 7DmarkII it is every bit the shooter as the 1DIV. With the lenses I use I don't find it to be the best in bright sunlight, I do really like it in light that is not so good to overcast and sometimes down right bad light. I know in this area it can excel. Ive seen some really good stuff with lenses I don't have in super bright light. I think anyone still holding on to the flawed camera theory had better look at what is being produced with the 7DmarkII.

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8574/16205311039_25ecd224a5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qG1s​ot  (external link) IMG_1792 (external link) by Jeff Manser (external link), on Flickr

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
22,570 posts
Gallery: 1956 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 79448
Joined Jul 2013
     
Feb 01, 2015 18:50 |  #3697

Jeff 'think anyone still holding on to the flawed camera theory had better look at what is being produced with the 7DmarkII.' well said with a perfect example.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Feb 01, 2015 18:58 |  #3698

Yes I agree, You guys rock


Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butterfly2937
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,150 posts
Gallery: 378 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1477
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut USA
     
Feb 01, 2015 19:02 |  #3699

Pondrader wrote in post #17410811 (external link)
I believe there were ups and downs with some of the owners of the 7DmarkII, There is certainly a major learning curve of which I'm not sure we are through and not having the codec sure didn't help but don't cast doubt on the 7DmarkII it is every bit the shooter as the 1DIV. With the lenses I use I don't find it to be the best in bright sunlight, I do really like it in light that is not so good to overcast and sometimes down right bad light. I know in this area it can excel. Ive seen some really good stuff with lenses I don't have in super bright light. I think anyone still holding on to the flawed camera theory had better look at what is being produced with the 7DmarkII.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qG1s​ot  (external link) IMG_1792 (external link) by Jeff Manser (external link), on Flickr

I don't doubt that if you get a good one! :-) The problem seems to be a quality control problem you only have to read the accounts of experienced users that have gone through 2 or 3 bodies to get a properly focusing one. That is a little hard to ignore.


_______________
flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butterfly2937
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,150 posts
Gallery: 378 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1477
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut USA
     
Feb 01, 2015 19:04 |  #3700

Efstratios wrote in post #17410799 (external link)
Even if I only use f/5.6 lenses for wildlife?

Yes a good consistant and accurate body works great with any lens you out on it!:-)


_______________
flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Pondrader. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 01, 2015 19:07 as a reply to  @ butterfly2937's post |  #3701

Im not sure about any of that Carol, I have felt that mine was not right at times but I can tell you the camera had nothing to do with it.


IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7460/16374957101_3c411174ba_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qWZW​fz  (external link) IMG_1404 (external link) by Jeff Manser (external link), on Flickr
IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7362/15792779314_5f311faa93_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/q4y8​5w  (external link) IMG_2768 (external link) by Jeff Manser (external link), on Flickr

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
     
Feb 01, 2015 19:53 |  #3702

butterfly2937 wrote in post #17410861 (external link)
I don't doubt that if you get a good one! :-) The problem seems to be a quality control problem you only have to read the accounts of experienced users that have gone through 2 or 3 bodies to get a properly focusing one. That is a little hard to ignore.

I do wish you lived closer Carol we could trade for a day and go out and shoot


Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butterfly2937
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,150 posts
Gallery: 378 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1477
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut USA
     
Feb 01, 2015 20:07 |  #3703

Pondrader wrote in post #17410915 (external link)
I do wish you lived closer Carol we could trade for a day and go out and shoot

That would be fun! I am so wishing for spring! I know I have nothing to complain about compared to the amount of snow you have! LOL


_______________
flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hummingbird
Senior Member
361 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 16
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina, USA
     
Feb 01, 2015 20:13 as a reply to  @ post 17409587 |  #3704

Beautiful Photos!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Avatar
16,028 posts
Gallery: 2548 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 57084
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minden, Ontario, Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Pondrader. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 01, 2015 20:15 |  #3705

Thanks All taken with the 7DmarkII

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8649/15756744833_a8fe935416_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/q1nr​hn  (external link) IMG_1271-2 (external link) by Jeff Manser (external link), on Flickr All taken with the 7DmarkII

Jeff ........, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,867,010 views & 103,893 likes for this thread, 718 members have posted to it and it is followed by 367 members.
-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
782 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.