Very nice Gus!
Post edited over 4 years ago by ancientone80.
Canon 7D II, 650D | Canon EF-S 10-22, EF-S 17-55/2.8, EF-S 18-135 STM, 100-400L IS II, 70-200L IS II, 50/1.4, 100/2.8 IS Macro | Canon MT-24EX, Speedlite 600EX-RT
I just thought this was hilarious!
Cream of the Crop
Gallery: 161 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Location: b.c. canada
Aug 30, 2015 12:04 as a reply to @ wisv1k's post |
hilarious & corny at the same time!
Never make a decision when you have to pee. L Cohen
ejenner wrote in post #17688135
I've already posted this pic in a couple of places, but I thought I'd add it here as an example of the 7D2 at ISO3200. I just printed this 16x20 and it looks pretty darn good. I'd say that the much nicer noise character (finer, less splotchy than 7D, 5DIII etc..), which has been mentioned before, definitely helps when printing.
Full res version in flickr.
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/xZJso8 Female Broad-Tailed Hummingbird by Edward Jenner, on Flickr
digital paradise wrote in post #17689155
Nice prop blur. That is one thing on my bucket list I have not put some serious effort into. Next on my list.
Gallery: 919 photos
Best ofs: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Sulphur, La
Lester Wareham wrote in post #17687265
Love the first shot, great eyeline between the two.
Last shot is great too, loving the strong perspective and low angle here.
Thanks, to you and Digital_Paradise.
Canon EOS 20D | 1 7D gripped | 2 7D2's gripped | EF 70-200 F2.8 L IS | EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS II USM | EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM | EF 50 F1.8 | Sigma 17-50 F2.8 OS | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM | Canon Extender EF 2x III | Editing of photos is okay.
How do I change this?
Joined Oct 2009
Post edited over 4 years ago by digital paradise.
cutwater wrote in post #17689159
It's not easy, especially with a camera that does better with higher shutter speeds. My 5D3 does prop blur easier, but 8-10 fps is much better
I have thre 5D3 as well so I'll have to try both. I tried this quickly once and it seemed like I could not get good blur unless I shot at 1/160. I like 1/250 better.
Aug 30, 2015 21:02 as a reply to @ digital paradise's post |
cutwater wrote in post #17689271
I think it depends on prop rpm and angle to subject as well - there is some blur at 1/320 sometimes, but 1/125 - 1/250 seem to work best
I had read 1/320 was about the fastest you could shoot. As simple as it sounds I never considered prop speed. No two would be exactly the same. I would have never thought of angle. Thanks for the info.
Cream of the Crop
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined May 2012