Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 16 Sep 2014 (Tuesday) 05:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Headshot critique

 
beano
Goldmember
Avatar
4,168 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: Berkshire. UK
     
Sep 16, 2014 05:29 |  #1

Hi All.. I've been playing with the lights again, and would love some C&C on everything from lighting/posing to processing. I'm at a pretty basic level for all of it, but have given myself a year to improve to a point where i can start charging.. A long way to go, so be as brutal as you feel necessary! ;)

1.

IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3847/15069799569_4f5d4a376d_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oXEE​ov  (external link) Toby Headshot 1 (external link) by stalb (external link), on Flickr

2.
IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5553/15069991107_e91662b586_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oXFD​jT  (external link) Toby Headshot 2 (external link) by stalb (external link), on Flickr

3.
IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3915/15233547126_fed1d3809e_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pd8U​Qf  (external link) Toby Headshot 3 (external link) by stalb (external link), on Flickr

4.
IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5586/15253462161_0aa724a280_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/peTY​SV  (external link) Toby Headshot 4 (external link) by stalb (external link), on Flickr

Scott

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixil ­ Studio
Goldmember
Avatar
1,270 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Denver
     
Sep 16, 2014 09:53 |  #2

#2 is too blown out for me
go to home depot and but a 4x8 sheet of foil backed insolation makes a great reflector for about $20


Denver wedding and event photographer (external link)
My photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beano
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,168 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: Berkshire. UK
     
Sep 16, 2014 10:47 |  #3

I can get a good sized reflector from eBay for not much more than that, and will be soon. I can see what you're saying about #2. According to Lightroom, the skin isn't clipping, but now that I look at it again, it does seem to burn my retinas a little lol!

Thanks for taking the time to comment ;)


Scott

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WookieeGunner
Member
52 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2014
     
Sep 16, 2014 10:52 |  #4

Lighting wise I like #3 the best but the crop of the head looks a little weird to me (shaving off the top and leaving some of the shoulders makes it feel like you had the camera too low to me, others might think it is fine.)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
Sep 17, 2014 03:34 |  #5

I like #3 for a couple of reasons. The lighting ratio is what I go for and you have more in focus. IMO the DOF is too thin for this type of headshot as you have it in #1 and #2.

I don't mind the chopped head in #3 either but I would like to see more shoulders.


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beano
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,168 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: Berkshire. UK
     
Sep 17, 2014 04:04 |  #6

Thanks guys. 3 is my fav too.. Steve, would you say that the nose needs to be in focus (that's what bugs me with these shots)? Or, the whole head?


Scott

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
Sep 17, 2014 11:45 |  #7

Hi Scott.
For most studio stuff I tend to have everything in focus. I normally shoot at f/8 because there's not usually anything distracting in the background. Even with a mottled background at f/8 and 6ft or so from the background it gives it just enough "blur."


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
Sep 17, 2014 11:49 |  #8

Sorry I should have said when I shoot with strobes I shoot normally at around f/8. Sometimes I'll shoot with a seamless background and natural light then I'll be anywhere from f/2 to f/8.


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beano
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,168 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: Berkshire. UK
     
Sep 17, 2014 13:03 |  #9

Thanks for the tips Steve, much appreciated ;)


Scott

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,925 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2270
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Sep 17, 2014 21:22 |  #10

pupils are too large, get a continuous light source somewhere in front of the subject.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 17, 2014 21:32 |  #11

I know you are going for the Hurley crop but its not working here.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixil ­ Studio
Goldmember
Avatar
1,270 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Denver
     
Sep 17, 2014 23:36 |  #12

windpig wrote in post #17162155 (external link)
pupils are too large, get a continuous light source somewhere in front of the subject.

good call either he is trippin balls or its a really dark room


Denver wedding and event photographer (external link)
My photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beano
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,168 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: Berkshire. UK
     
Sep 18, 2014 04:44 |  #13

He's partially blind in his right eye, but I'll try the continuous light source next time for sure..

Gonzo, you got me hehe! Do you not think it works on the 3rd shot? If not, can you say why? ;)


Scott

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 18, 2014 08:42 |  #14

beano wrote in post #17162589 (external link)
He's partially blind in his right eye, but I'll try the continuous light source next time for sure..

Gonzo, you got me hehe! Do you not think it works on the 3rd shot? If not, can you say why? ;)

Its the best of the bunch, at least you dont have the chin cropped awkwardly. I think the problem with doing the Hurley crop is that most photographers dont bother to do the other Hurley tricks including the chin/jawline pose and drawing out the subject's personality. Hurley tends to shoot actors/celebrities people who are comfortable mugging for the camera and projecting themselves. When you dont have that all you are left with is an awkward crop.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WillMeades
Senior Member
693 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1174
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Millbrook, Alabama
     
Sep 18, 2014 20:12 |  #15

In addition to some of the other comments....Just scrolling through the shots, the biggest thing that sticks out to me is that they are all very soft. I'm not sure if its the depth of field or maybe camera shake. Also the 4th shot is a little confusing. The lighting/shadows would almost suggest a more serious looking shot, but then there's the smile. I would also brighten the teeth.


“too much stuff, too little time"
WillMeades (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,631 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Headshot critique
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1054 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.