Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 28 Sep 2014 (Sunday) 12:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Problems with grey sky and BIF.

 
bx338
Member
247 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 255
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Englandshire
     
Sep 28, 2014 12:46 |  #1

I wonder if anyone can give me advice about shooting BIF against pale grey/flat sky.
I had a go yesterday at some flying mallard and my shots came out pretty poor, the sky is over exposed and the ducks are dark, as you would expect.
Im new to shooting a 5d3 and learning as im going along.
Is there a setting which would be better to use in situations like that. Afterwards i thought that altering the white balance from AWB to cloudy might have been better ?
Any pointers in the right direction will help thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Sep 28, 2014 13:24 |  #2

Altering WB settings won't affect the exposure, so you may as well stay in AWB.

You say "the sky is over exposed and the ducks are dark, as you would expect". Well, if you are expecting that, surely you know that you need to increase exposure to correctly expose the duck ? Just dial in some +ve EC, or use manual mode, to set a suitable exposure. The sky will look crap, but that is always the problem with shooting against flat, pale grey sky.

The best pointer I can give is to pick your time better. Overcast skies are great for some shooting, but not when the sky is the background to a bird. Photography is all about light, you need to shoot when conditions are optimal if you want great results. The mallard will look much better against a blue sky, and positioning yourself so that the sun lights the bird nicely will give better results.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bx338
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
247 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 255
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Englandshire
     
Sep 28, 2014 14:18 |  #3

Thanks for the reply.
Unfortunately, its only once a fortnight i get the chance to get out and practice this type of shot so i have to give it a try regardless of conditions.
I did think about increasing exposure, but the sky was bad enough as it was, so thought its best left alone.
I will take your advice next time i get the chance to get out and have a practice, cheers.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 28, 2014 14:24 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Expose for the bird and forget about the sky, as it's gonna be blown out anyway. You can crop in on the bird in post to make the white canvas of sky less dominant. Of course, this also depends on what lens you're using: if your longest focal length renders the bird as 2% of the frame, then forget about cropping: you'll get a thumbnail.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Sep 28, 2014 14:31 |  #5

The bottom line is you can't get a perfect picture with less than perfect light.
So the only option is blow the sky out and try to get the bird exposed well, which will mean manual exposure settings
Even if you get it right, with bad light, you still don;t get great photos.

That said, you are right, shoot shoot shoot in any condition!
This is how you learn everything, including how to deal with bad light.

One possible option depending on distances is to try and use fill flash. It's not easy to employ for birding, but it can be done and it can help a lot.
Plus, you'll then be learning about fill and FEC etc..


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maureen ­ Souza
Ms. MODERATOR     Something Spectacular!
Avatar
34,157 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9274
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central California
     
Sep 28, 2014 15:36 |  #6

And you can blue up the sky a little in Photoshop :)


Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.

5DMK4
7DMK2
Canon Lenses: 50/1.4, 135/2.0, 100-400mm II, 24-70/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Sep 28, 2014 15:57 |  #7
bannedPermanently

Spot meter on the bird




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Sep 28, 2014 16:24 |  #8

john crossley wrote in post #17182408 (external link)
Spot meter on the bird

Nothing wrong with this suggestion, but you will need to understand spot metering and use it as a starting point for judging exposure that you set yourself, rather than simply use it in auto mode with Av, Tv etc. It works well if you are in a situation where you can take a reading from a suitable mid tone and lock that in manually.

Spot metering will suggest far too much exposure when shooting black / dark birds and far too little when shooting white / light birds. Shooting a white swan against a grey sky would quite likely result in the bird being MORE underexposed using spot metering, than using evaluative, because the meter is seeing more white and less grey.

If not choosing an exposure manually, you will need to set appropriate +ve or -ve EC according to the bird. This can be tricky to do in time if set to record a light coloured bird and a black one suddenly flies into view. Using Ev metering, which will take much more sky into account, you can set maybe +1 or +1 1/2 stops to increase exposure and be more in the ballpark for whatever flies past.

Keep in mind that the exposure needed will also be likely to vary depending on whether you are seeing mainly the top or underside of the bird, and that can change in a moment if it suddenly banks the other way.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Oldjackssparrows
Jeeeez, incredible comments!
Avatar
13,743 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 2739
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Tol Eressea
     
Sep 28, 2014 18:12 |  #9

There are lots of ways to try, the best is to not shoot with those conditions. Kinda coldhearted but true...


Donate to Pekka, help pay our server costs...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 28, 2014 19:07 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Oldjackssparrows wrote in post #17182664 (external link)
There are lots of ways to try, the best is to not shoot with those conditions. Kinda coldhearted but true...

Actually, if the OP is just starting, these conditions are the best to be shooting in, as there's no sun or brightest patches of sky that will require him to quickly change settings on the fly. Since the sky is uniform in its brightness, he can do just as Sandpiper suggested: use spot meter to take a reading off a mid tone, say a bright red wall or car, then lock that exposure in manually and focus only on aiming the camera at the bird and tracking its movement: no more tampering with the exposure.

It's blue skies and sunny conditions that can be more challenging.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Evan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,327 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Oregon
     
Sep 28, 2014 19:56 |  #11

If it is a bright enough day, I will shoot at a low ISO of 100-200 and then underexpose the bird by 1 stop. Most of the time, this will give me enough to bring the sky back, as well as push the bird up. I've found that sensors are quite good at pushing shadows when shot at low ISO's.

If it was a fairly dark day, shooting at ISO 100-200 isn't going to give me the shutter speeds that I need, so this option will be thrown out. I prefer to do it with the lower ISO's because when you push the bird, you don't introduce nearly the same amount of noise that you would at ISO's of 400+.


--
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,676 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Problems with grey sky and BIF.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1089 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.