Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Sep 2014 (Monday) 23:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What am I missing?

 
red ­ snapper
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Gallery: 104 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 403
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Sep 29, 2014 23:04 |  #1

Hey all,

I have itchy fingers and am considering adding some gear but am not sure what I should consider, if anything. I haven't been particularly prolific with my shooting recently due to Uni and work and family and life....... so I don't have a particular focus at the moment. I have been thinking about maybe a UWA but am not sure how much use I would give it, alternatively maybe a macro. My main subjects are my kids, as you'd expect, but for more arty stuff I am trying to develop some street skills and also enjoy urban architecture. I also shoot sport when a decent event is in town, cycling, motor sport etc.

I would love some thoughts on either gear or suggestions on how to go out establishing my needs vs wants. Feel free to have a look at my flickr and 500px and suggest ways to improve on what I do.

Oh and budget is limited, probably no more than $500 Aussie.

Cheers


If you do what you always do, you get what you always get.

7D, 400D, Sigma 30 f1.4, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon 70-200 f4L (non IS), Canon 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 STM, Petri 50mm f1.7, Revuenon-Special 35mm f2.8, Revuenon-Special 135mm f2.8, 430 EX II,
flickr (external link), 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Sep 29, 2014 23:50 |  #2

Heya,

Well, if you're not getting out and shooting, why buy something to shoot with that will in turn collect dust? I think you have a great array of tools. 17-70 and 70-200 covers all your general stuff. The 30 F1.4 lets you get real creative. Not sure what else you would need since you have wide angle, telephoto and fast prime all covered.

Keep your money for some vacation/outings with the family. And take the camera.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ snapper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Gallery: 104 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 403
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Sep 30, 2014 00:36 |  #3

MalVeauX wrote in post #17185312 (external link)
Heya,

Well, if you're not getting out and shooting, why buy something to shoot with that will in turn collect dust? I think you have a great array of tools. 17-70 and 70-200 covers all your general stuff. The 30 F1.4 lets you get real creative. Not sure what else you would need since you have wide angle, telephoto and fast prime all covered.

Keep your money for some vacation/outings with the family. And take the camera.

Very best,

Cheers for that,

I think I agree, I think I just needed to hear that from someone else. Once my Uni stuff is over in 4 weeks I plan to get out much more often so I'll see if anything holds me back so to speak.


If you do what you always do, you get what you always get.

7D, 400D, Sigma 30 f1.4, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon 70-200 f4L (non IS), Canon 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 STM, Petri 50mm f1.7, Revuenon-Special 35mm f2.8, Revuenon-Special 135mm f2.8, 430 EX II,
flickr (external link), 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Sep 30, 2014 01:11 |  #4

red snapper wrote in post #17185362 (external link)
Cheers for that,

I think I agree, I think I just needed to hear that from someone else. Once my Uni stuff is over in 4 weeks I plan to get out much more often so I'll see if anything holds me back so to speak.

I know how it goes, we've all been there.

Sometimes we spend more time looking at stuff online and not simply out shooting some where. I find when I'm out shooting I rarely think about all the stuff I want, and rather, think about just shooting. When we sit on these forums and browse stores and look at other people's work, we start getting itchy to buy stuff.

My current itch is a weather proof camera, with no AA filter, for some time lapse sunsets or sunrises in the dank weather of Florida, and for when I'm out on the boats.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Sep 30, 2014 01:31 |  #5

MalVeauX wrote in post #17185404 (external link)
I know how it goes, we've all been there.

Sometimes we spend more time looking at stuff online and not simply out shooting some where. I find when I'm out shooting I rarely think about all the stuff I want, and rather, think about just shooting. When we sit on these forums and browse stores and look at other people's work, we start getting itchy to buy stuff.

My current itch is a weather proof camera, with no AA filter, for some time lapse sunsets or sunrises in the dank weather of Florida, and for when I'm out on the boats.

Very best,

GoPro lol.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Sep 30, 2014 02:04 |  #6

Talley wrote in post #17185427 (external link)
GoPro lol.

I have a GoPro. It's video.

I'm talking high quality stills.

From Canon, that means 1D series. Even then, lens required costs. I'm actually considering a Pentax K30 or K5, with a 18-55 WR. They're cheap alternatives to "waterproof P&S's" and definitely not as costly as a 1D and `L lens.

Dunno yet.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dodgyexposure
Goldmember
2,874 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 234
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 30, 2014 02:07 |  #7

MalVeauX wrote in post #17185448 (external link)
I have a GoPro. It's video.

I'm talking high quality stills.

From Canon, that means 1D series. Even then, lens required costs. I'm actually considering a Pentax K30 or K5, with a 18-55 WR. They're cheap alternatives to "waterproof P&S's" and definitely not as costly as a 1D and `L lens.

Dunno yet.

Very best,

Nikon AW?


Cheers, Damien

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,008 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5399
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Sep 30, 2014 10:00 |  #8

I say go to a thrift store, antique mall or flea market and find some cool old lenses. A "new" MF lens always renews my interest in going out to shoot, it gives me something different to play with and it's super cheap.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emfinite
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2014
     
Sep 30, 2014 10:34 as a reply to  @ EverydayGetaway's post |  #9

I am in the same boat as you are. I feel as if I'm missing something, but I guess I'm not. I guess I could kinda use a portrait lens like the 135L, but I'm not in a huge hurry. I photograph my 14 month old son and I'm itching for good portraits. Right now I have a Canon 16-35 F4L, Tamron 24-70 F2.8 and the Canon 70-200 F2.8L. The whole spectrum is covered except for a portrait lens. I find myself not using the 24-70 too often anymore. I mainly shoot wide (architecture/landscap​es) and shoot at the 200mm end of my telephoto. if you end up going full frame, the 16-35 F4L is SPECTACULAR. Sharp all around and you can get very creative with it. It's pointless to use on a crop though. Maybe eventually invest in a full frame, grab a UWA and sell the 17-70? For now though it looks like you have everything covered!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,402 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 518
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
Sep 30, 2014 10:49 |  #10

emfinite wrote in post #17185991 (external link)
Right now I have a Canon 16-35 F4L, Tamron 24-70 F2.8 and the Canon 70-200 F2.8L. The whole spectrum is covered except for a portrait lens.

Why can't your 24-70 or 70-200 work as a portrait lens?


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qlayer2
OOOHHH! Pretty Moth!
Avatar
941 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 122
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Sep 30, 2014 11:32 |  #11

Sometimes when I feel that way, I'll look for something cheap to try out new things. In the last couple of months I picked up some new gels for my flashes, and a couple of inexpensive manual lenses to play with. I've been looking at picking up some macro tubes on the cheap to play some more. It's always fun to try something new without dropping a bunch of money, and still getting new toys.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emfinite
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2014
     
Sep 30, 2014 12:27 as a reply to  @ Qlayer2's post |  #12

I meant to say a prime! Those two are great but I would love to get a 2.0 L lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Sep 30, 2014 12:37 |  #13

What's missing is how much time you can dedicate shooting.

Don't get more gear - you have the things you need already.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bubbygator
I can't tell the difference
Avatar
1,477 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 63
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles
     
Sep 30, 2014 13:13 as a reply to  @ DocFrankenstein's post |  #14

At the risk of getting booted around here, I'll put in a rec for the Canon 85/1.8 . It's a quality lens at an affordable price. The main thing is it's fast !! Besides the f/1.8, the AutoFocus is quick enough to simply swing the camera to the action and click. It's great for close sports and kids and ... anything that moves.


Gear List
The avatar is my middle grandson. (the TF can't tell the difference, but the fish is frowning and the kid is grinning)
Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BKATX
Senior Member
363 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: DFW
     
Oct 01, 2014 14:18 |  #15

If you're using the crop bodies listed in your sig then I'd go for a UWA lens. When I use my 7d I always take a 11-16 and 17-50. 17mm just isn't wide enough for me on a 1.6x crop. I just got back from vacation (western Colorado and eastern Utah) and the 11-16 was used constantly for landscapes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,765 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
What am I missing?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1582 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.