which one will you pick? They are both about 400mm. The former has IS, but may have slower AF, more flexible. Later will probably have better IQ and AF? Did I miss anything? which will you prefer?
eelnoraa Goldmember 1,798 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2007 More info | Oct 07, 2014 22:50 | #1 which one will you pick? They are both about 400mm. The former has IS, but may have slower AF, more flexible. Later will probably have better IQ and AF? Did I miss anything? which will you prefer? 5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevindar Cream of the Crop  5,050 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2007 Location: california More info | Oct 07, 2014 23:04 | #2 the 400L has better af than the bare 300, and would have a very substantially better af than 300 with tc. same is also true about image quality. the 300 has much shorter mfd, and great magnification, even more so with 1.4x, and it has IS. if you are shooting huming birds, the 300 is better. If you are are primarily shooting near 400, get either the 400L or 100-400L My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Tanker Goldmember  4,470 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction More info | 400L for birds in flight/action, 300L+1.4 for static or low-light shots. Kel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1364 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
