Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 18 Oct 2014 (Saturday) 07:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Downsizing speedlite?

 
cedm
Senior Member
631 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2008
Location: KL, Malaysia
     
Oct 18, 2014 07:12 |  #1

Hi guys,

I need some inputs on choosing the right speedlite for my needs. I already have a 430EX, but it no longer works in E-TTL mode and I never liked the weight it adds to the camera in the first place. Too often I've left the flash at home because I didn't want to carry that heavy thing around. E-TTL is a must, I don't really need HSS, and the smaller, the better.

At first, I thought of getting a Yongnuo 500EX, as it does everything my 430EX used to for half the price. Downside, it's just as heavy. I did some research and found 3 lighter alternatives: Sunpak RD2000, Metz 24 AF-1 and Canon 270EX II. They all are roughly half the size and half the weight of my 430EX. That's great, but feature-wise they come with some compromises.

First of all, I have to say that I don't need all the power I can get from the big speedlites. I don't try to do crazy things like overpower the sun or light an entire building. My usage is focused on portrait and close up/macro photography. Most of the time, it's just one person standing 2-3m in front of me, or a small group of people (at most 3-4 persons). Direct flash (bare or through umbrella) shouldn't be an issue as I can do that with my 430EX and I need to dial the power way down not to over expose. What I'm not so sure about is if these small flashes are powerful enough to get a good exposure when bouncing off the ceiling...

Power aside, my main concern is that none of them swivel. They all tilt (nice), but none swivel sideways (boo). How to get a nice soft light in portrait orientation if I cannot bounce off the ceiling? I do have a TTL cord, so I imagine I could just hand hold the flash, point it towards the ceiling and shoot away. Anyone using this technique? Is it convenient?

The 270EX II looks quite attractive. It's the most full featured of the 3 but it also cost twice as much (and is even slightly more expensive than the YN-500EX). Is it really worth its premium price?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thorrulz
Goldmember
Avatar
3,818 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 469
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Oct 18, 2014 10:02 |  #2

For the price the V860 is an excellent choice for a flash . I have the Nikon version and love how easy it is to use.

http://flashhavoc.com …c-ving-ettl-flash-review/ (external link)

I will also add that since the V860 uses a lithium ion rechargeable battery rated for 650 full power shots with a recycling time of 1.5s at full power you'll save a fortune on AA batteries.


Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cedm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
631 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2008
Location: KL, Malaysia
     
Oct 18, 2014 20:25 |  #3

Thorrulz wrote in post #17219648 (external link)
For the price the V860 is an excellent choice for a flash.

You didn't read my post, did you?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thorrulz
Goldmember
Avatar
3,818 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 469
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Oct 18, 2014 23:11 |  #4

Sorry for trying to help, then get the YN-500EX you mentioned in your original post.


Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Oct 18, 2014 23:27 |  #5

The 430ex is already a fairly small flash. The next size down is the 320ex and it still has a swivel head.

The 270ex and other flashes you mentioned are barely an upgrade from the pop up flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Oct 19, 2014 07:28 |  #6

gremlin75 wrote in post #17220778 (external link)
The 430ex is already a fairly small flash. The next size down is the 320ex and it still has a swivel head.

The 270ex and other flashes you mentioned are barely an upgrade from the pop up flash.

This is pretty much what I was going to say.

I think you should consider concentrating on off camera flash with something on the larger end. One of the Yongnuo units should work fine. With some practice one off camera flash can light up a room fairly well even if you are moving around a bit. Just keep the flash to your back or 90 degrees to the left or right and balance it with the ambient. If you were to grab two cheap flashes you could have one on either side of the room and shoot however you want.

Not sure the weight and size saving of the 320 would be significant enough for the other trade offs. Isn't the swivel limited to one direction?


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cedm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
631 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2008
Location: KL, Malaysia
     
Oct 19, 2014 11:01 as a reply to  @ Left Handed Brisket's post |  #7

Thanks, I do appreciate everyone's opinions but I realize I may not have been very clear in my first post: I want to get a smaller/lighter flash and don't need the power of the bigger flashes.

So anything the size of a typical speedlight (e.g. 430EX, 580EX, YN-5xx, etc.) is out. Actually, anything that runs on 4x AA is heavier than I want to deal with. The closest thing to a small full featured speedlight I could find is the Nissin 40i (4x AA too). It sits half way between a 430EX and a 270EX in both size and weight. Quite compelling but outside of my budget (it costs as much as a 430EX).

Since I don't need the power of my 430EX, I've been looking at much smaller units that runs on just two AA batteries like the 270EX to get the small form factor I would like. The GN charts for the 430EX and 270EX tells me the 270EX has about half the power of the former. Not bad as I use my 430EX between 1/4 and 1/64 power settings most of the time.

If I get another flash the size of my 430EX, I know it will collect dust at home as I hate to carry extra weight around. At home, I can continue to use my 430EX in manual mode and shoot through umbrella. I do that already with great results. But I also need a flash when I go out and shoot around (outdoor in low light or somewhere else indoor). No fixed setup, no umbrella, just casual walk around and shoot. That's why I need ETTL, and want something light only. A 270EX would take no space in my small bag and not be a burden to carry.

I do plan on using the flash off camera, which is why I'm leaning towards the 270EX rather than the sunpak or metz I mentioned. The 270EX has a wireless slave mode, so I could very well just hand hold it further away from the camera or place it somewhere on the side (wall, piece of furniture, tree, whatever) and fire away. In theory that should work. The bummer is the lack of swivel with the flash on camera. That limits the creative usage to just bounce off the ceiling in landscape and bounced off the left wall in portrait.

Would love to hear from people who own a 270EX and have tried to use it for more than just on camera fill flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Oct 19, 2014 11:32 |  #8

gremlin75 wrote in post #17220778 (external link)
The 430ex is already a fairly small flash. The next size down is the 320ex and it still has a swivel head.

The 270ex and other flashes you mentioned are barely an upgrade from the pop up flash.

I got a 270ex hoping to use it in certain situations when I didn't want the bulk of 580exII. I hardly use it because it just doesn't have the power or flexibility I've come to rely on from the 580.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Oct 19, 2014 11:37 |  #9

cedm wrote in post #17221427 (external link)
Thanks, I do appreciate everyone's opinions but I realize I may not have been very clear in my first post: I want to get a smaller/lighter flash and don't need the power of the bigger flashes.

No you were clear, but the 270ex is still barely an up grade from the pop up. Though you can get it off camera so that is a plus. I've used one of the small flashes like the 270ex and was very disappointed in it. It's amazing how much you can miss a swivel head, Espically when using the wireless slave and need line of sight for the flash to fire (no way to have the head of the flash toward the subject and the IR sensor toward the camera).

It sounds like you're already sold on the 280ex though. If you think you'll be happy with it then get it. You're the one who will be using it so you're the one who has to decide if it will be right for you.

Personally if I'm going to bring a flash with me I'm going to bring a flash that has all the features I need/want (ETTL, manual, bounce/swivel head, powerful). A flash like the 270ex doesn't have what I need so bringing it is just going to be a waste of space anyways. To others any speedlight is going to be too small and be a waste of space. For you the 270ex might be the perfect option. Only you know though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Oct 19, 2014 20:53 as a reply to  @ gremlin75's post |  #10

I've been reading good reviews on the Nissin i40.

http://www.nissindigit​al.com/i40.html (external link)


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cedm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
631 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2008
Location: KL, Malaysia
     
Oct 19, 2014 22:33 |  #11

gremlin75 wrote in post #17221470 (external link)
It sounds like you're already sold on the 280ex though. If you think you'll be happy with it then get it. You're the one who will be using it so you're the one who has to decide if it will be right for you.

Not sold yet, I'm still debating what would work best for me. I'm trying to set one of the requirement (the size) as a starting point and figure out if I can deal with the compromises. It would be a lot easier if I could get my hands on a few options and try each one. But all I can do now is extrapolate from what I have and make guesses.

Most people mention power as being the 270EX weakest point, but I'm not sure I really need that more much power. How much power do I need to light 1-2 persons, half body (waist up) at a distance of 2-4m (my typical style of portrait photography)? If indoor, I would want to bounce off the ceiling. Outdoor (evening/night time), direct flash I guess (no other choice, right?)

yogestee wrote in post #17222221 (external link)
I've been reading good reviews on the Nissin i40.

http://www.nissindigit​al.com/i40.html (external link)

I'm having a look at it again. The specs are great. It's a little bit bulky but still smaller than my 430ex. The price is tough... $270? My budget is around $150++.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blackey ­ Cole
Senior Member
480 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Alamogordo New Mexico
     
Oct 19, 2014 22:37 |  #12

Does your camera have a built in flash? If so use it if you need something more checkout the frenel lens that can be installed to increase the effect.


Click Here and Join the POTN flickr Group Today! (external link)

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
malow
Member
Avatar
169 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2009
Location: Brazil
     
Oct 20, 2014 00:39 as a reply to  @ Blackey Cole's post |  #13

how about the MEIKE MK-300-C ?


mods: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/malow/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,738 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 226
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Oct 20, 2014 00:52 |  #14

cedm wrote in post #17222389 (external link)
Most people mention power as being the 270EX weakest point, but I'm not sure I really need that more much power. How much power do I need to light 1-2 persons, half body (waist up) at a distance of 2-4m (my typical style of portrait photography)?

That all depends on what modifier you're using, what your aperture is, and what ISO you're at.

If you're just shooting the flash difectly at the subjects then not much power is neededh. If you're using a soft box or umbrella (which I have to assume you're not since the flash it's self is more the you like to take), shooting at 100 ISO and f8+ then that might be stretching the limits of the little flash......and even if it does have enough power your recycle times will suck. If you're bouncing off a wall then the further away the wall is the more power you'll need (plus factor in desired ISO and aperture). Though since the head doesn't swivel that limits your bouncing options while on camera to basically the ceiling.

You can always decrease the power of a flash from its max output, but you can never go over its max power. Plus the lower the power setting of the flash the faster your recycle times will be and the more pops you'll get out of a set of batteries.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cedm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
631 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2008
Location: KL, Malaysia
     
Oct 20, 2014 00:56 |  #15

Blackey Cole wrote in post #17222395 (external link)
Does your camera have a built in flash? If so use it if you need something more checkout the frenel lens that can be installed to increase the effect.

I have a 60D, so yes I got a popup flash (with wireless commander built-in). But the popup flash won't allow me to bounce off ceiling/wall nor go OCF. I only use it for fill flash when my subject is back lit.

malow wrote in post #17222505 (external link)
how about the MEIKE MK-300-C ?

Seems like it doesn't tilt nor swivel. No wireless slave mode either, so that's just like a more powerful popup flash I believe.

So far it's a toss between the 270EX II and the i40 I reckon. I'll try to figure out how much flash power I really need and wait for a deal I guess.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,144 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Downsizing speedlite?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1324 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.