Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Mobile Device Cameras 
Thread started 21 Oct 2014 (Tuesday) 20:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Android 5.0 Lollipop RAW image files.

 
Tom_D
Goldmember
Avatar
1,425 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Napa ~ on the edge of retirement.
     
Oct 21, 2014 20:45 |  #1

One of the new features with the next Android firmware release is access to the RAW image files from the device camera. Should be interesting, maybe RAW file processor on phones and tablets.

Google Search Reselts (external link)


Gallery (external link)
7DMkII, 40D, 17-55, 70-200 f/2.8 IS and more...
More Wag, Less Bark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mfturner
Member
164 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Longmont, CO
     
Nov 24, 2014 23:15 |  #2

I am playing with L Camera, a prototype that saves the DNG files on my Nexus 5. Terrible WB for the associated saved jpg, but it does allow a greater range of shutter speed, 1/75000th through 1/1.2 sec, along with ISO control (100 through 10000) in manual exposure mode. So I'd say the big advantages I see in one night of playing with it are manual exposure, 3 stops more light on the long exposure, and a stop or two on each end for recovering highlights or detail in shadows. Particularly compared to Google Camera's HDR+, which crushes the blacks to help with apparent noise reduction, L Camera has the potential for several more stops of dynamic range. The apk does allow a few other things, like bursting with focus bracketing or exposure bracketing; I'm not sure how much I'll use those yet. ISO 6400 on that camera is pretty ratty...I guess ISO 800 on the Nexus is comparable to 6400 on my 60D, which isn't terribly different than the ratio of the sensor sizes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom_D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,425 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Napa ~ on the edge of retirement.
     
Nov 24, 2014 23:43 |  #3

Thanks for the info on the DNG files on the Nexus 5 .

The Verizon Samsung GS5 does not have 5.0 yet. If I do end up getting access to the RAW files I don't know how much processing of them I'll try to do but the development will be interesting.


Gallery (external link)
7DMkII, 40D, 17-55, 70-200 f/2.8 IS and more...
More Wag, Less Bark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ flying ­ moose
Goldmember
1,640 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 25, 2014 00:40 |  #4

Tom_D wrote in post #17291666 (external link)
Thanks for the info on the DNG files on the Nexus 5 .

The Verizon Samsung GS5 does not have 5.0 yet. If I do end up getting access to the RAW files I don't know how much processing of them I'll try to do but the development will be interesting.

Not sure about the US but in Canada I was told by my carrier that the S5 is not getting Lollipop until early 2015.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom_D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,425 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Napa ~ on the edge of retirement.
     
Nov 25, 2014 08:25 |  #5

the flying moose wrote in post #17291704 (external link)
Not sure about the US but in Canada I was told by my carrier that the S5 is not getting Lollipop until early 2015.

Yes, that is what I was thinking with Verizon. Rumors are that Samsung will have it out in December and then Verizon has to review it, customize it and then send it out to the phones. January at the earliest.


Gallery (external link)
7DMkII, 40D, 17-55, 70-200 f/2.8 IS and more...
More Wag, Less Bark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Nov 25, 2014 08:36 |  #6

Maybe I'm missing something.. (Or too lazy to read all the Google results :) )..

But is this topic about Android devices being able to process RAW files from EOS and other cameras? (They showed an Oly camera in one of the articles).. Or is this just about Android cameras being able to take better pictures with Lollypop?

Either way, it will be a long while until I see it.. Like 'the flying moose', my carrier is always one of the last to upgrade their phones when a new version of Android comes out..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom_D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,425 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Napa ~ on the edge of retirement.
     
Nov 25, 2014 08:40 |  #7

Tom_D wrote in post #17226261 (external link)
One of the new features with the next Android firmware release is access to the RAW image files from the device camera.

Google Search Reselts (external link)

The RAW files from the phone's camera will be available to software developers.


Gallery (external link)
7DMkII, 40D, 17-55, 70-200 f/2.8 IS and more...
More Wag, Less Bark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mfturner
Member
164 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Longmont, CO
     
Nov 25, 2014 08:47 |  #8

This app specifically allows saving cell phone camera pictures in raw (DNG) format to potentially get better pictures on a cell phone, especially low light pics. Right now, this specific app only works on the Nexus 5 and 6. I'm hoping to get some example pics of the cat or dog for show and tell maybe with the 60d for reference.

I should mention, he has a hack to take 60 fps high-def vid, for replay in slo-mo. Someone will be interested in trying that I'm sure, I just do stills.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mfturner
Member
164 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Longmont, CO
     
Dec 13, 2014 08:59 |  #9

I took a few pictures of the cats the other night to illustrate where I think this is helpful, which is in very low light. My previous opinion was that the cell phone camera is good when (1) I can live with the wide angle FOV, (2) my subject is static, and (3) the light is good. The L Camera app helps me remove the third limitation, although it is the manual exposure control that allows most of this, the raw mostly just allows fixing white balance or mild exposure errors which often mess up with low lighting. The Nexus 5, whether with Google Camera, Open Camera, or L Camera, in auto exposure mode seems to limit the settings to about 1/12th-1/8th of a sec and ISO 3200. I'm guessing it has to do with the metering subroutine, but I may be wrong. L Camera's manual exposure mode allows ISO to go to 10000, and more importantly shutter speed to go to 0.8 Sec. Not that I can hand-hold the thing steadily at 0.8 Sec, but I can at 1/4 sec as I'll show, mostly due to the OIS built into the camera.

These are all under the same dim interior lighting, just some decorative trim lights were on in the room, and roughly proper exposure seemed to be about 1/4 sec, f/2.4, ISO 4000 or so. I have down-rezzed the full shots to something small just to show tonality, color, etc (818 px wide or so) and will occasionally include 100% 200x200px crops.

First, Google Camera's HDRplus mode which a lot of people like. f/2.4, 1/10th of a sec, ISO3200 were in its EXIF although I've always thought it may take 2 or three shots and stack them like with astronomy photos, and then apply a tone curve that absolutely crushes the blacks. I use it a lot in medium lighting, bright interiors to shady or overcast outdoors.


IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_702899.jpg
Image hosted by forum (702899) © mfturner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Next L Camera straight out of the camera, this is the same exposure I'd expect from Google Camera, f/2.4, 1/12th of a sec, ISO3200 (open camera often goes down to 1/9th if I recall correctly). It looks to me like L Camera and Google Camera use the same jpeg renderer, which is actually quite good with a properly exposed photo, which this is not.


[ATTACH]B[/ATTACH

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_702900.jpg
Image hosted by forum (702900) © mfturner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mfturner
Member
164 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Longmont, CO
     
Dec 13, 2014 09:04 |  #10

Now, a RawTherapee attempt to rescue the second picture above. Again, 1/12th sec, f/2.4, ISO3200

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_702902.jpg
Image hosted by forum (702902) © mfturner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

And a 200x200px 100% enlargement of the grey cat's face (yes, she should be grey)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_702903.jpg
Image hosted by forum (702903) © mfturner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Looks like you'd expect from a cell phone, which is to say, pretty poor. I'll admit that I can't really tell the difference in the 4x by 4x down-rezzed photo and the 100% crop in this viewer, I hadn't noticed that. We'll see if the next one is any better.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mfturner
Member
164 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Longmont, CO
     
Dec 13, 2014 09:09 |  #11

OK, now I try to take over the exposure in the manual mode. First a 1/4 sec, f/2.4, ISO3200 shot. This is about 1/3 stop underexposed still, but pretty close. The SOOC jpeg is actually pretty good, but I used RT here to adjust the WB and exposure slightly. The SOOC jpeg renderer also increases saturation and applies a higher contrast tone curve to punch it up a bit.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_702904.jpg
Image hosted by forum (702904) © mfturner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Again, a 200x200 px at 100% of the grey cat's face

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_702905.jpg
Image hosted by forum (702905) © mfturner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Now she looks grey at least! These colors are reasonably true.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mfturner
Member
164 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Longmont, CO
     
Dec 13, 2014 09:20 |  #12

Finally, an attempt to go a little further to 1/2 sec, and it's a bit soft due to movement (probably both camera and cat movement). First, here is SOOC at 1/2 sec, f/2.4, ISO3200

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_702909.jpg
Image hosted by forum (702909) © mfturner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Now a run of the raw through RT, showing that some of the previous blow-out was recoverable when bringing this back almost a stop

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_702910.jpg
Image hosted by forum (702910) © mfturner [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Once again, I'll repeat that this is in very dim lighting, the first two pictures are what you'd normally get from a cell phone. Most of the improvement is simply getting the longest shutter speed you can hand-hold since the aperture is fixed, to get more signal in to lower the SNR, and this requires optical stabilization. The raw really only helps with WB and exposure errors.

Focus, ah, that's another rant. I take multiple shots, intentionally refocusing in-between, because you never know where the thing is going to decide to focus.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,482 posts
Likes: 86
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Dec 14, 2014 19:02 |  #13

My OnePlus One gained the ability to shoot RAW files a few months ago.

It's really quite handy when the dynamic range in a scene is extreme.


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraFiend
Member
32 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2014
     
Jan 23, 2015 11:30 |  #14

I've heard this is an awesome feature of Android 5.0. I can't wait to get a new phone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom_D
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,425 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Napa ~ on the edge of retirement.
     
Jan 23, 2015 12:22 |  #15

CameraFiend wrote in post #17396315 (external link)
I've heard this is an awesome feature of Android 5.0. I can't wait to get a new phone.

I'm looking forward to our Samsung GS5s getting updated to 5.xx. Looks like there were a few initial bugs that I think have been worked out so just as well that Samsung and Verizon take a while to get a solid working version. Lollipop has several features I am looking forward to.


Gallery (external link)
7DMkII, 40D, 17-55, 70-200 f/2.8 IS and more...
More Wag, Less Bark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,071 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Android 5.0 Lollipop RAW image files.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Mobile Device Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1522 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.