Hi!
I had the chance to play with a 7D mark II for a short time and improvised a short comparison with my 7D mark I.
2 lenses: EF-S 18-135 STM (autofocus in live view) and 100mm MACRO f/2.8 (first version, without IS) (manual focus in live view at 10 magnification)
2 apertures: f/5.6 and f/8
The table is aprox 60cm wide, shooting distance aprox 2.2m at aprox 100mm (well 96/98 on the EF-S 18-135 STM)
Strobe Godox qt-600 with a stripbox above the camera. I don’t have a light meter so the exposures are not consistent but for the same aperture and ISO both lenses and cameras received the same amount of light (same value on the strobe – as described in the diagram below)
Both RAW and JPG. Noise reduction disabled, standard camera profile.
Due to time constraints I cannot prepare side by side 100% crops but if anyone has the time I am uploading the original files (I only had time to rename the jpgs according to the exif)
Is not a scientific test, it was done in a hurry but I was very curious to see the differences between the 2 cameras at low ISO.
What do you think?
https://www.flickr.com …e_/sets/72157648777577830
JPGs
http://we.tl/I02wDAB2sF
wetransfer complete archive
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

... I wondered why the hair was looking blown out 
