Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 08 Nov 2014 (Saturday) 02:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Comparison 7D vs 7D MKII Studio Test - low ISO

 
xseven
Member
105 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2013
     
Nov 08, 2014 02:15 |  #1

Hi!
I had the chance to play with a 7D mark II for a short time and improvised a short comparison with my 7D mark I.
2 lenses: EF-S 18-135 STM (autofocus in live view) and 100mm MACRO f/2.8 (first version, without IS) (manual focus in live view at 10 magnification)
2 apertures: f/5.6 and f/8
The table is aprox 60cm wide, shooting distance aprox 2.2m at aprox 100mm (well 96/98 on the EF-S 18-135 STM)
Strobe Godox qt-600 with a stripbox above the camera. I don’t have a light meter so the exposures are not consistent but for the same aperture and ISO both lenses and cameras received the same amount of light (same value on the strobe – as described in the diagram below)
Both RAW and JPG. Noise reduction disabled, standard camera profile.
Due to time constraints I cannot prepare side by side 100% crops but if anyone has the time I am uploading the original files (I only had time to rename the jpgs according to the exif)
Is not a scientific test, it was done in a hurry but I was very curious to see the differences between the 2 cameras at low ISO.
What do you think?
:)

https://www.flickr.com …e_/sets/7215764​8777577830 (external link) JPGs
http://we.tl/I02wDAB2s​F (external link) wetransfer complete archive

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/11/2/LQ_699098.jpg
Image hosted by forum (699098) © xseven [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xseven
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
105 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2013
     
Nov 08, 2014 04:51 |  #2

I should mention that the jpgs are straight from the camera, not from raw files.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Nov 08, 2014 05:23 |  #3

When iso nr is set to disabled, there is still nr at some of the iso levels, and the 7d2 has higher values set than the 7d, just as an fyi.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xseven
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
105 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2013
     
Nov 08, 2014 07:08 |  #4

I am not concerned too much with noise in this test ... I was looking into the sharpness/details side of the road :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Didereaux
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 256
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Upper Texas coast
     
Nov 08, 2014 07:17 |  #5

With only a slightly more than cursory look through these to me it would appear that the 7DII has no advantage over the 7DI @ or below 1600 ISO. That was a lot of work you did to do this test, and it is done well enough to have real value. kudos


Couple of Canon bodies, a couple of Canon lens, few gadgets all stuffed in a bag...and a stick, and a tripod.
https://www.flickr.com …ringandmontepho​tos/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunmcfd
Senior Member
Avatar
833 posts
Gallery: 70 photos
Likes: 622
Joined Nov 2012
     
Nov 08, 2014 07:17 |  #6

It may just be my phone but it looks like the 7d won to me.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Canon 24-70 ii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xseven
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
105 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2013
     
Nov 08, 2014 08:59 |  #7

My ... not so "happy with it" attempt of editing the raw files ... in Lightroom: tiffs from 7D II and cr2 from 7D ...

In a hurry I couldn't match the edits (first time editing tiffs in Lightroom) ... but you can still see the differences : http://we.tl/k8yg0XsWP​V (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xseven
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
105 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2013
     
Nov 08, 2014 09:27 |  #8

LOL ... first mistake ... being used with Capture one (where you recover the highlights by dragging the slider to the right) I did the same in Lightroom and accentuated the highlights instead of recovering some :( ... I wondered why the hair was looking blown out :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xseven
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
105 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2013
     
Nov 09, 2014 06:20 |  #9

And ... taking everything into consideration, today I will send back the new 7D and keep the old one.

Thank you Canon for giving me the final push to go full frame ...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,507 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Comparison 7D vs 7D MKII Studio Test - low ISO
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1393 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.