Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
Thread started 10 Nov 2014 (Monday) 05:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Recover files from a corrupt drive (USB or IDE?)

 
marathon
Member
Avatar
146 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Current City: Singapore
     
Nov 10, 2014 05:11 |  #1

I have this old iomega 80GB external drive from way back in 2004. I have a lot of my old photos on this drive from when I was just starting photography. It somehow got corrupted a few years back so I kinda left it in storage and didn't mess with it at all.

Earlier this month, I encountered a problem with an SD card that was somehow corrupted and the photos on it were from a very important shoot. So I tried the different recovery softwares listed in another thread. Stellar Phoenix Recovery did the trick and recovered everything. And I mean EVERYTHING. Even photos from a different shoot. I was so impressed by the software that I immediately thought of recovering the files from my old iomega external drive.

So I plug it in last night and it's still running, almost 12 hours later. It has recovered 634MB so far. At the rate it's going, it looks like scanning and recovering the files from the drive will take 1 whole week!? When I recovered files from the corrupted SD card (which was 16GB) it took maybe 2-3 hours I think, just using the SD slot in my macbook. So it's not really a question of whether I can recover the files or not... it's more of a question about how long it takes to recover them.

Would it be faster if I took the hard drive out of the enclosure and connected it to my desktop computer? I'm pretty sure this still has an IDE cable but it's ok since my desktop still supports IDE. Or would it be the same? Does anyone have experience on this?

I'm pretty sure this is a USB 2.0 drive, but maybe since it's been corrupted pretty bad, it's having trouble reading all the sectors on the disk. The drive is formatted in FAT32 not NTFS.


canon 600D : canon 5D mark II : tamron 28-75mm f2.8 : mc zenitar 16mm f2.8 fisheye : canon efs 10-22mm : carl zeiss jena 35mm f2.4 : canon 50mm f1.8 : super takumar 50mm f1.4 : SMC takumar 50mm f.14 : jupiter 37A 135mm f3.5 : pentacon 200mm f4 : tamron 70-300mm VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 10, 2014 09:28 |  #2

Most hard drives from the IDE era on have internal read-correction, etc. firmware which a recovery app will try to make use of. It's probably spending most of its time trying to read the media, not to transfer the data to the computer for analysis and recovery. So changing to an IDE/PATA connection won't make a whole lot of difference.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frozenframe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,729 posts
Gallery: 189 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 394
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Kansas, USA
     
Nov 10, 2014 09:29 |  #3

I don't have an answer, however I'm fixing to find out. I have an old Internal IDE drive that I lost a ton of photos on, and just put it aside. I think I'll see what happens.


Ron
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marathon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
146 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Current City: Singapore
     
Nov 10, 2014 11:13 |  #4

Thanks for your input Jon. I stopped the scanning midway and managed to recover just a few files, but even just copying the files from the old HD to my computer took forever. Maybe there's something wrong with the plates in the hard drive itself?

Hi Ron, hope you have better luck than I do. Let us know how things go with your testing.


canon 600D : canon 5D mark II : tamron 28-75mm f2.8 : mc zenitar 16mm f2.8 fisheye : canon efs 10-22mm : carl zeiss jena 35mm f2.4 : canon 50mm f1.8 : super takumar 50mm f1.4 : SMC takumar 50mm f.14 : jupiter 37A 135mm f3.5 : pentacon 200mm f4 : tamron 70-300mm VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frozenframe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,729 posts
Gallery: 189 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 394
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Kansas, USA
     
Nov 10, 2014 11:16 |  #5

So far not good. I can't get my PC to see the drive, I think it may be completely dead. I'll have to play with it later.


Ron
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Nov 10, 2014 12:32 |  #6

This is the kind of thing that I like to keep an older laptop or something around for. My friend is currently using a small Raspberry Pi based computer with a large backup battery. Drive recovery, especially with older drives, is frequently bound by the drive itself. So with the cheap little system set up it can be left to sit there and churn numbers for a week or two without bothering your main computer. Ideally use something on a battery backup, as you don't want to have to restart a two week long scan if the power flicks off for 30 seconds.


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marathon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
146 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Current City: Singapore
     
Nov 10, 2014 14:22 |  #7

Luckless wrote in post #17263186 (external link)
This is the kind of thing that I like to keep an older laptop or something around for. My friend is currently using a small Raspberry Pi based computer with a large backup battery. Drive recovery, especially with older drives, is frequently bound by the drive itself. So with the cheap little system set up it can be left to sit there and churn numbers for a week or two without bothering your main computer. Ideally use something on a battery backup, as you don't want to have to restart a two week long scan if the power flicks off for 30 seconds.

Whoa... you mean to say a week long scan is a normal thing for data recovery? Even for just an 80GB drive? I have an old laptop here with a broken LCD, but works with an external monitor. I could probably install recovery software on it and leave it running to finish the scan... but a full week non-stop scan is a normal thing?


canon 600D : canon 5D mark II : tamron 28-75mm f2.8 : mc zenitar 16mm f2.8 fisheye : canon efs 10-22mm : carl zeiss jena 35mm f2.4 : canon 50mm f1.8 : super takumar 50mm f1.4 : SMC takumar 50mm f.14 : jupiter 37A 135mm f3.5 : pentacon 200mm f4 : tamron 70-300mm VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Nov 10, 2014 16:47 |  #8

It depends on the drive and what you are doing with it. I've had a few that would constantly throw errors and took ages to go through. But usually they're in the hours range. When it is taking that long then it suggests that there was either something wonky with the software settings, or the drive itself has issues.


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marathon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
146 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Current City: Singapore
     
Nov 15, 2014 03:44 |  #9

Argh! I was going to try the drive recovery again this weekend, but the drive started clicking!

http://en.wikipedia.or​g/wiki/Click_of_death (external link)

Seems like this was common with iomega! Yikes! Fingers crossed that this will still work.


canon 600D : canon 5D mark II : tamron 28-75mm f2.8 : mc zenitar 16mm f2.8 fisheye : canon efs 10-22mm : carl zeiss jena 35mm f2.4 : canon 50mm f1.8 : super takumar 50mm f1.4 : SMC takumar 50mm f.14 : jupiter 37A 135mm f3.5 : pentacon 200mm f4 : tamron 70-300mm VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,424 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4521
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 15, 2014 18:52 |  #10

marathon wrote in post #17263380 (external link)
Whoa... you mean to say a week long scan is a normal thing for data recovery? Even for just an 80GB drive? I have an old laptop here with a broken LCD, but works with an external monitor. I could probably install recovery software on it and leave it running to finish the scan... but a full week non-stop scan is a normal thing?

Do not forget that the Iomega is a SERIAL access device, not a RANDOM access device like a harddrive or even a floppy disk!...If it has to have its directory reconstructed, the recovery software has to find it in the Iomega disk directory, scan serially to the actual data, scab back (rewind back) to the directory and try to fix part of the directory, and then scan forward serially again to find a bit more data, then scan back to the directory and fix another little bit.... ad infinitum!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,645 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Recover files from a corrupt drive (USB or IDE?)
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
780 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.