Could I get some opinions on this image?
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Nov 10, 2014 11:57 | #1 Could I get some opinions on this image? Image hosted by forum (699267) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rrblint Listen! .... do you smell something? More info | Nov 10, 2014 12:00 | #2 Horrible pose, lackluster background, and terrible facial expression. Sorry but this is one for the bin. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2014 13:11 | #3 I am sorry to say Mark is right... It appears you just had her sit down for a quick shot. The background is wrinkled, etc... However it appears (IMO) the lighting on her face is good. What were you trying to accomplish when you took this photo? Maybe that will help in some critiques? http://averymckenna.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info | i generally don't say things like this, but this photo doesn't have a single redeeming property. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Nov 10, 2014 13:26 | #5 Bad pose, knees separate, toes turned in, shoulders square, sitting on her hands, nothing in that pose is appealing or engaging. The off center crop looks unbalanced. I'd be curious to hear what you were thinking with this framing?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CanonVsNikon Senior Member 255 posts Joined Jan 2013 More info | Nov 10, 2014 13:43 | #6 Permanent banAgreed. Not much else to say.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drumsfield Goldmember 1,601 posts Likes: 27 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Bethesda Md More info | Nov 10, 2014 14:14 | #7 Aside from this photo being a serious candidate for a poster on "what not to do". I'll put in my 2 cents and hopefully I can be constructive. Canon 5D MkIII | Olympus OM-D | Olympus E-P2 | 16-35L MKII | 24-70L MKII | 70-200L MKII | 85L MKII | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 | 100-400mm L MKII | 20mm 1.7
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2014 15:24 | #8 I have had lights for a while now but don't have a lot of room for them. I really have to shift my den around to play with them so I don't do this everyday because of the amount of work. I was trying to work on lighting a little bit. My child was not to thrilled about sitting in front of the camera. I used 2 Photogenic 1500SL lights with 24x36 softboxes to the side and a off camera flash through an octobox in the front. I was trying to get lighting and color right. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hannya Goldmember 1,062 posts Likes: 66 Joined Apr 2008 Location: UK More info | Nov 10, 2014 16:23 | #9 Lack of room is an issue. You need the backdrop farther away from the model. Start with lights at 45 deg and have one as the main, one as the fill. Posing has been mentioned by others. Always difficult with an unwilling victim. “Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I got off of work and on the way home I decided to trash the den and take some more images. I get so aggravated with myself. I want to conquer this! Image hosted by forum (699284) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (699285) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Last one Image hosted by forum (699287) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Nov 10, 2014 17:35 | #12 Still gotta work on your crops. Cutting off the elboe in the first new shot of your daughter is not good. The second shot is also oddly cropped. It looks like you are going for a rule of thirds crop but that fails when the subject is square to the camera. The negative space might work outside the studio where that area had some visual impact. But as is its just a big heavy blob of boring competing with your subject. For now forgrt about the rule of thirds and creative cropping, its killing your shots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2014 17:42 | #13 gonzogolf wrote in post #17263736 Still gotta work on your crops. Cutting off the elboe in the first new shot of your daughter is not good. The second shot is also oddly cropped. It looks like you are going for a rule of thirds crop but that fails when the subject is square to the camera. The negative space might work outside the studio where that area had some visual impact. But as is its just a big heavy blob of boring competing with your subject. For now forgrt about the rule of thirds and creative cropping, its killing your shots.
Image hosted by forum (699288) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Nov 10, 2014 17:52 | #14 mdaddyrabbit wrote in post #17263751 Like this is SOOC with a little sharping Her face is in the middle of the frame and a full third of the frame is empty space above her head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2014 18:23 | #15 gonzogolf wrote in post #17263768 Her face is in the middle of the frame and a full third of the frame is empty space above her head.
Image hosted by forum (699293) © mdaddyrabbit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1522 guests, 190 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||