Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Nov 2014 (Tuesday) 18:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 f/4 IS vs. non-IS

 
ekkybedmond
Member
136 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2009
Post edited over 8 years ago by ekkybedmond.
     
Dec 02, 2014 13:57 |  #16

I don't know the IS version, but isn't this "the IS-version is sharper" just BS (coming from IS-owners).
Optically both versions are the same


Edit: must have trusted the good Ken Rockwell's word too much

More glass elements in IS-version

I stand corrected




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Dec 02, 2014 17:11 |  #17
bannedPermanent ban

I am considering the non-IS version of this lens. I already have the Sigma OS version, so f/2.8 and stabilization is covered. I just need something smaller/lighter/cheape​r for when I don't need f/2.8 or IS (OS, VC, XYZ, whatever). The only real alternative is the 200 2.8L II. Still thinking....


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nethawked
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 244
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Dec 03, 2014 13:14 as a reply to  @ ekkybedmond's post |  #18

Maybe your reply is BS, considering you don't know the IS version?

Comparison (external link).

Review (external link).

This lens is extremely sharp wide open and from corner to corner even on a full frame body. There is little improvement when stopping down - the f/4 IS starts out sharp wide open. Impressive performance.

The non-IS 70-200 f/4 is similarly sharp in the center over the mid and long portion of the focal length range, but the f/4 IS is sharper in the center through 85mm or so and is noticeably sharper in the corners over most of the focal length range. These two lenses are most similar at 200mm. These differences are reduced as the subject distance is increased (the non-IS lens performs more similarly to the IS lens). The f/4 IS and f/2.8 IS 70-200mm L lenses are similarly sharp at identical aperture and focal length settings.

I've been looking at this lens for months. While both lenses would be a pleasure to own I'm sure, it's been commonly reported that the newer lens is sharper under several scenarios. There are additional benefits as well, learned from various reviews. Here's another (external link).

I agree with the advice of many others in this thread, it's worth it to make the stretch for IS, particularly for telephoto zooms.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,567 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
70-200 f/4 IS vs. non-IS
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1113 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.