Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 12 Nov 2014 (Wednesday) 11:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Just picked up a ef 20-35mm f3.5-4.5 USM

 
Giofazio44
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Central NJ
     
Nov 12, 2014 11:29 |  #1

Hello everyone I just just picked up the 20-35mm for 100 Bucks. Whats your thoughts on it? Do you guys think its worth keeping or reselling it?

Thanks Gio


NJ
G.M.F Photography
_______________
1DmkIIn/40D BG-E2N/SL1/XTi BG-E3/EOS 3/70-200 f4 Lusm/24-105mm F4L/17-40mm f4 "L"usm/100mm macro/20-35mm/28-135mm IS USM/50mmf1.8/70-300mm IS USM/430exmkii/ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howiewu
Senior Member
Avatar
629 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Feb 2011
     
Nov 12, 2014 11:36 |  #2

Why don't you try it out yourself?


5DII, 70D
17-40mm f/4 USM L, 24-70mm f/4 IS USM L, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM L, 24mm f/3.5 TS-E L, 35mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4 USM, 100mm f/2.8 IS USM L, 300mm f/2.8 IS USM II L, 430 EX II, 270 EX II, 1.4x TC III, 2x TC III, Kenko Pro 300 1.4x TC
Home Page: http://www.travelerath​ome.com (external link), Blog: http://travelerathome.​wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Nov 12, 2014 11:37 as a reply to  @ howiewu's post |  #3

terrible range. I'd dump it for something more useful -- e.g., 17-40, 16-35 etc


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Giofazio44
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Central NJ
     
Nov 12, 2014 11:43 |  #4

howiewu wrote in post #17267525 (external link)
Why don't you try it out yourself?

Thats what I plan on doing im waiting for it to be delivered!


NJ
G.M.F Photography
_______________
1DmkIIn/40D BG-E2N/SL1/XTi BG-E3/EOS 3/70-200 f4 Lusm/24-105mm F4L/17-40mm f4 "L"usm/100mm macro/20-35mm/28-135mm IS USM/50mmf1.8/70-300mm IS USM/430exmkii/ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Giofazio44
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Central NJ
     
Nov 12, 2014 11:43 |  #5

ed rader wrote in post #17267529 (external link)
terrible range. I'd dump it for something more useful -- e.g., 17-40, 16-35 etc

You think so? Have you used it before?


NJ
G.M.F Photography
_______________
1DmkIIn/40D BG-E2N/SL1/XTi BG-E3/EOS 3/70-200 f4 Lusm/24-105mm F4L/17-40mm f4 "L"usm/100mm macro/20-35mm/28-135mm IS USM/50mmf1.8/70-300mm IS USM/430exmkii/ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Nov 12, 2014 12:18 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

I had it for a few days. Immediately resold it on CL. At least I broke even. All the range of a good prime and none of the aperture. Add to that some horrific flare and CA issues, and you've got a poor investment, even for $100. The efs 18-55 IS II is way better lens, in every respect imaginable, except full-frame compatibility.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tapeman
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,723 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
Nov 12, 2014 12:33 |  #7

I used to own one when I was shooting film (maybe 15 years ago) and thought it was a pretty good lens. At the time it was a much better value than the 20-35 f/2.8 Canon and nearly as good.

The range is kind of limited though.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Giofazio44
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
180 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Central NJ
     
Nov 12, 2014 17:20 |  #8

Tapeman wrote in post #17267636 (external link)
I used to own one when I was shooting film (maybe 15 years ago) and thought it was a pretty good lens. At the time it was a much better value than the 20-35 f/2.8 Canon and nearly as good.

The range is kind of limited though.

Hmmm I guess time will tell should be delivered sometime this week.


NJ
G.M.F Photography
_______________
1DmkIIn/40D BG-E2N/SL1/XTi BG-E3/EOS 3/70-200 f4 Lusm/24-105mm F4L/17-40mm f4 "L"usm/100mm macro/20-35mm/28-135mm IS USM/50mmf1.8/70-300mm IS USM/430exmkii/ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmai86
Member
153 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Aug 2014
     
Nov 12, 2014 17:22 |  #9

I thought it was a great lens for the price. I wouldn't pay more than $250 for it though, in pristine condition.

Some people don't like going as wide as 15,16,17mm, so a hard stop at 20mm is pretty useful.

Only problems I saw that it had was vignetting and some CA, and fairly flimsy construction.

It's not the fastest thing either but again, for its price and size, there are few if any FF alternatives. You get 3 focal (20, 24, 35) lengths in one barely-there package.


EDIT - I also sold mine a few weeks after getting it though, and got a 20-35L instead. Awesome lens. But, that one is also gone now, in favor of a 16-35 F4 IS.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
longbeachgary
Redwood Original
589 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 160
Joined Aug 2003
     
Nov 12, 2014 17:35 |  #10

I have one that I used to use on my 10D for exterior real estate photos for our flyers. Worked great for what I needed it for but was useless on the interior of properties - too wide on the crop sensor. Switched it out for the 10-22.


Canon R3 (2), RF85L 1.2, RF600 F11, RF800 F11, Canon 14-35L F4, Canon 1DX Mark iii, 100 F2.8 Macro, 135 F2, 200L F2.8, 300L F4, 400L 5.6, 17-40 F4, 24-70 F2.8L, 70-200 F2.8L ii, 70-200 F4 IS, 100-400 L F4.0-5.6, Tamron 150-600.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Nov 12, 2014 17:36 |  #11

Giofazio44 wrote in post #17267540 (external link)
You think so? Have you used it before?


I didn't have the same lens but do have a similar Sigma 21-35mm, I personally loved the range but I only ever used it at 21mm and 35mm, so almost like two primes.


I need to get it re serviced to use on my EOS bodies again.


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Nov 12, 2014 22:15 |  #12

Giofazio44 wrote in post #17267540 (external link)
You think so? Have you used it before?

I don't have to use a lens to know the range is terrible :D. I want 16mm on my ultrawide. 20mm is very old school


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Nov 12, 2014 22:16 as a reply to  @ ed rader's post |  #13


Some people don't like going as wide as 15,16,17mm, so a hard stop at 20mm is pretty useful.


that's some serious spin there :D.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howiewu
Senior Member
Avatar
629 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Feb 2011
     
Nov 12, 2014 22:31 |  #14

ed rader wrote in post #17268745 (external link)

Some people don't like going as wide as 15,16,17mm, so a hard stop at 20mm is pretty useful.


that's some serious spin there :D.

Agree, that's a bizarre argument.


5DII, 70D
17-40mm f/4 USM L, 24-70mm f/4 IS USM L, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM L, 24mm f/3.5 TS-E L, 35mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4 USM, 100mm f/2.8 IS USM L, 300mm f/2.8 IS USM II L, 430 EX II, 270 EX II, 1.4x TC III, 2x TC III, Kenko Pro 300 1.4x TC
Home Page: http://www.travelerath​ome.com (external link), Blog: http://travelerathome.​wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,087 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Just picked up a ef 20-35mm f3.5-4.5 USM
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
911 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.