Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2014 (Wednesday) 14:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Mark II - Focus Discussions

 
butterfly2937
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,150 posts
Gallery: 378 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1477
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut USA
     
Feb 04, 2015 12:15 |  #1636

8612images wrote in post #17415008 (external link)
So thought we were getting somewhere with improved performance.
Heard the cardinal outside my window and thought I'd grab a pic. 7d2 with 70-200 and 1.4x. Flipped camera to spot focus. Case 1 (-2,0,0) Both image priorities to "focus"
Don't see anything in focus. Could it be the camera having trouble seeing the bird with the dingy sky? Wouldn't something be in focus if both priorities are set to focus?


Hosted photo: posted by 8612images in
./showthread.php?p=174​15008&i=i135250029
forum: Canon Digital Cameras



Hosted photo: posted by 8612images in
./showthread.php?p=174​15008&i=i77651516
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Wow those are terrible but was it obvious in the VF that the subject was not in focus? Does this lens focus properly on another body?

I wonder if there is a problem with the lens contacts on the 7Dii body that could be causes all of these focus issues?


_______________
flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Feb 04, 2015 12:43 |  #1637

8612images wrote in post #17415008 (external link)
So thought we were getting somewhere with improved performance.
Heard the cardinal outside my window and thought I'd grab a pic. 7d2 with 70-200 and 1.4x. Flipped camera to spot focus. Case 1 (-2,0,0) Both image priorities to "focus"
Don't see anything in focus. Could it be the camera having trouble seeing the bird with the dingy sky? Wouldn't something be in focus if both priorities are set to focus?


Hosted photo: posted by 8612images in
./showthread.php?p=174​15008&i=i135250029
forum: Canon Digital Cameras



Hosted photo: posted by 8612images in
./showthread.php?p=174​15008&i=i77651516
forum: Canon Digital Cameras


Mine is setup up the same way and that was my question to CPS last night - how can I get an OOF picture when the camera isn't supposed to allow it?

The issue I have with exchanging, which I can do, is that I wonder what if it is my lens/camera combo? As best I can tell, the issue only happens with the 600 and TCs, so what if my lens needs some adjustment? Now it's perfect on my 1Dx, so I don't want a lot of adjustment going on. But I am considering that as an option. Likely? Not in my book, but possible.

I'm waiting to hear form CPS on the samples I sent and then I'll make my decision.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon-Chas
Member
Avatar
243 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 115
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Scotland
     
Feb 04, 2015 12:53 as a reply to  @ huntersdad's post |  #1638

I always use ONE SHOT AF MODE for birds on a perch, and you will get a beep confirmation if enabled when focus is achieved, you don't get it in AI SERVO MODE, another reason I never use it on perched birds


Chas
http://www.wildfeather​s.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon-Chas
Member
Avatar
243 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 115
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Scotland
Post edited over 8 years ago by Canon-Chas. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 04, 2015 12:56 as a reply to  @ butterfly2937's post |  #1639

Strange you should mention the contacts on the camera. When I plugged in my 300 f/2.8 MK2 a couple of weeks ago I got a" lens error code 02" or something..

Anyway I cleaned the camera contacts and lens contacts, both looked like shiny brand new gold even before I
rubbed them with a soft cloth.

No more errors, but I have never had one on my 1D MK4 with this lens..

Couple of pics from this morning where I really tested the camera really hard on fast birds in good light, everything perfect, couldn't fault the camera in any mode . I only use AI SERVO for BIF shots and AF Case 1 default +IS MODE 2 on my 300 f/2.8 MK2. I know some people use AI SERVO MODE all the time even for perched birds, which I don't really understand but if it works for them why not ?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/1/LQ_711285.jpg
Image hosted by forum (711285) © Canon-Chas [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/1/LQ_711286.jpg
Image hosted by forum (711286) © Canon-Chas [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Chas
http://www.wildfeather​s.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Feb 04, 2015 13:14 |  #1640

butterfly2937 wrote in post #17415099 (external link)
Have you tried turning down the tracking speed to -1 or -2? I am just mentioning it just in case. THe Mark ii lenses seem to do better sometimes with the tracking sensitivity turned down. That doesn't explain the complete misses though. Are the misses in the middle of a burst or is the whole burst out of focus? Looking through the viewfinder can you tell the correct object is not in sharp focus? Have you tried tapping the AF-on button a few times when originally trying to acquire focus to see if the camera shifts focus each time as seen through the view finder?

Case 1 or 2 with tracking turned down to -1. I have tried -2 but it just locks on the wrong thing for longer. The misses are completely random - some are single shot misses, some are in a short burst in the middle, some at the end. There's no rhyme or reason. Via the VF, I can see my AF confirmation sign and to my eye the shot looks good, but it's obviously not.

Also, just to clear this up. I know a couple of these are distant - in particular the birds in flight. That is framed exactly how I wanted it, so there is no desire to crop any. However, even at a distance, I expect something to at least appear in focus and it's not. It would be unreasonable for me to think that I could crop down on any single bird and make that crop the image. But I do expect to be able to view at 50% and see where something is in focus.

As a reference point, here's a couple images from my 1Dx with 600 and 1.4x that has been heavily cropped. These shots were taken at a range of 125 yards per my range finder. The camera locked on and did it's thing. Will they blow up 24*36? Heck no. But it prints fine at smaller sizes. I have yet to get an image from the 7d2 at a similar distance that I could even print, much less crop heavily and print.

IMAGE: http://bradipock.smugmug.com/WildlifeandNature/Waterfowl-14-15/i-BR2ktfm/1/L/1DX01022015-7261-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://bradipock.smugm​ug.com …terfowl-14-15/i-BR2ktfm/A  (external link)

IMAGE: http://bradipock.smugmug.com/WildlifeandNature/Waterfowl-14-15/i-QLDqPk5/1/L/1DX01032015-7578-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://bradipock.smugm​ug.com …terfowl-14-15/i-QLDqPk5/A  (external link)

Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
8612images
Senior Member
Avatar
740 posts
Likes: 91
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Texas
     
Feb 04, 2015 13:58 |  #1641

butterfly2937 wrote in post #17415103 (external link)
Wow those are terrible but was it obvious in the VF that the subject was not in focus? Does this lens focus properly on another body?

I wonder if there is a problem with the lens contacts on the 7Dii body that could be causes all of these focus issues?

Bird was probably 15 yards away but I honestly could not see how focused he was/wasn't in vf. Worked last night at HS soccer.(poor example as I was playing with ISO12800)


IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/1/LQ_711297.jpg
Image hosted by forum (711297) © 8612images [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
habenero
Member
Avatar
234 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Dallas
Post edited over 8 years ago by habenero.
     
Feb 04, 2015 16:34 as a reply to  @ Canon-Chas's post |  #1642

Those shots are great! It's shots like these that stirred my interest in this body. Other shots posted are what's kept me away. I will say I was sold on moving to the d750, but the flare issue.... Now I'm a guy w/o a camera set up. Perhaps a 5d3 or d810?


Randy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
8612images
Senior Member
Avatar
740 posts
Likes: 91
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Post edited over 8 years ago by 8612images.
     
Feb 04, 2015 16:51 |  #1643

flickr version

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8625/16444007251_d3653de13d_c.jpg

https://www.flickr.com …27689853@N04/16​444007251/ (external link)

Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kickflipkid687
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,074 posts
Likes: 151
Joined Jan 2014
     
Feb 04, 2015 17:19 as a reply to  @ habenero's post |  #1644

The D750 is a pretty good body, I got to use one for a while.

Although the 7D II is absolutely better built/has more customization or is easier to customize imo.
Also you definitely feel the FPS drop going to it from the Mark II.

You gotta get a high end SD card as well, since the 45 MB/s card I tried was terrible.
The camera was quite slow in bursts and the buffer went very quick.

At higher ISO, it was very very similar to the Mark II I felt.
But at low ISO, the dynamic range, or lack of noise at least in the shadows was very impressive.
Blows away almost any Canon. Maybe all of them, for now.

But, from all the hype surrounding it, I wasn't super impressed or blown away.

It didn't make me want to switch from Canon.


My Flickr page - https://www.flickr.com​/photos/86957042@N07/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
8612images
Senior Member
Avatar
740 posts
Likes: 91
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Texas
     
Feb 04, 2015 20:35 as a reply to  @ Canon-Chas's post |  #1645

Those are really nice. Haven't seen quite that out of mine.


Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ppmax
Member
177 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2009
     
Feb 04, 2015 21:52 |  #1646

Huntersdad--

I've seen some of the seemingly random "off by a good 2-3 feet" focus behavior that you posted about...and haven't been able to track it down yet either. I sent my 7D2 into Canon and while they didn't say they did any "electrical adjustments" they did say they performed focus tests and adjustments...and cleaned my sensor (I didn't notice any spots or smeary effects in my test shots...so this may have been a red herring).

It does seem to focus a bit better after getting it back...but some recent pics I took of the kids sledding displayed the same missed focus behavior (front or back focused by 2-3 feet). Interestingly, before sending my body in I had MFA'd my 50 1.4 to +5...when I got it back I had to kick it up to +15. I still need to dial in my 70-200 (which was used for the kids sledding pics) but as you say, no amount of MFA will account for such a wide margin. The odd thing is (as you mention) is that sometimes it totally misses...whereas most of my shots are on the money.

All this makes me think that issues like these are algorithmic in nature...that there is some scenario where the AF system freaks out and tracking is lost. As a BBF'er, I tend to hold one of the rear focus buttons down for a good while before taking pics. For the sledding pics, I stuck to case 1, and shot a variety of single point, both expanded modes, and a few large zone AF area modes. Here's a graph showing the "batting average" for each mode. Please note that I didn't shoot equal number of frames in each mode, which is why the bars are varying height:

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8574/16447195355_7e5f70d06b_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/r4ob​aH  (external link)

As you can see in the graphs, the keeper rate for AF Point Expansion (8pt) and Large Zone AF are a good deal lower than my keeper rates in other modes (in Case 1). I feel like I'm pretty good tracking (see Single Point AF) so maybe there is something about these two modes that isn't as robust as the other modes?

Anyways, I'm going to continue to do these analyses to see if there is a consistent pattern I can discern. The relatively low keeper rate shown in the graph above doesn't jibe with another analysis I did...which shows that my keeper rates in AF Point Expansion (8pt) and Large Zone AF was pretty good...but also note the keeper rate in AF Point Expansion (8pt) in Case 1 was also a good deal lower than other Cases.
IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7508/16241390402_786f478832_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qKcn​ws  (external link)

These graphs were generated from pics of completely different subjects (the 2nd graph was from shooting x-country skiers at close range with lots of back-to-front and then side to side motion...the first graph was primarily shooting back-to-front motion)...so--apart from the relatively low keeper rate in both graphs when using AF Point Expansion (8pt) with Case 1, there is no larger pattern I can see here that would indicate an intrinsic problem with each AF Area Mode/Case combo. (I don't put too much weight on this correlation because I didn't shoot a high volume of frames in this mode/Case combo...only 14 shots in this mode for sledding, and only 11 shots in this mode for the skiers).


HTH
PP



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butterfly2937
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,150 posts
Gallery: 378 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1477
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut USA
     
Feb 04, 2015 22:41 |  #1647

huntersdad wrote in post #17415195 (external link)
Case 1 or 2 with tracking turned down to -1. I have tried -2 but it just locks on the wrong thing for longer. The misses are completely random - some are single shot misses, some are in a short burst in the middle, some at the end. There's no rhyme or reason. Via the VF, I can see my AF confirmation sign and to my eye the shot looks good, but it's obviously not.

Also, just to clear this up. I know a couple of these are distant - in particular the birds in flight. That is framed exactly how I wanted it, so there is no desire to crop any. However, even at a distance, I expect something to at least appear in focus and it's not. It would be unreasonable for me to think that I could crop down on any single bird and make that crop the image. But I do expect to be able to view at 50% and see where something is in focus.

As a reference point, here's a couple images from my 1Dx with 600 and 1.4x that has been heavily cropped. These shots were taken at a range of 125 yards per my range finder. The camera locked on and did it's thing. Will they blow up 24*36? Heck no. But it prints fine at smaller sizes. I have yet to get an image from the 7d2 at a similar distance that I could even print, much less crop heavily and print.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://bradipock.smugm​ug.com …terfowl-14-15/i-BR2ktfm/A  (external link)

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://bradipock.smugm​ug.com …terfowl-14-15/i-QLDqPk5/A  (external link)

The 1DX images are in perfect focus. This really does look like a 7D2 issue either a hardware or software problem. It should not be this difficult especially when you are so familiar with the 1DX. Who knows maybe the AF points in the viewfinder are not aligned correctly. Something is really wrong when consistantly the AF thinks it is in completely sharp focus and the results show otherwise. If the camera had one or 2 frames in a burst like that but then recovered quickly and the subject in the rest of the frames were tack sharp that would give you something to work with. Results all over the place for no apparent reason make it very difficult to trouble shoot. I think I would use the lens in question and use LensAlign and focus tune first in one shot and then keep everything the same and switch over to servo and do a burst of shots and see if the burst is all over the place. If the camera nad lens can not pass that test there is definitely a problem. If the LensAlign test are done correctly ( follow the videos on Michael Tapes website ) everything will be perfectly aligned and the target will be well lit and at the distance recommended no closer than 25 x Focal length or about 8 feet for every 100mm. You do not have to figure in any crop factor. If the results are not good I would send the test results to Canon. Make sure you use one shot to make any MA to the lens before the AI Servo test.


_______________
flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Feb 04, 2015 23:18 |  #1648

8612images wrote in post #17415008 (external link)
So thought we were getting somewhere with improved performance.
Heard the cardinal outside my window and thought I'd grab a pic. 7d2 with 70-200 and 1.4x. Flipped camera to spot focus. Case 1 (-2,0,0) Both image priorities to "focus"
Don't see anything in focus. Could it be the camera having trouble seeing the bird with the dingy sky? Wouldn't something be in focus if both priorities are set to focus?


Hosted photo: posted by 8612images in
./showthread.php?p=174​15008&i=i135250029
forum: Canon Digital Cameras



Hosted photo: posted by 8612images in
./showthread.php?p=174​15008&i=i77651516
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

My guess is that you have Focus Search = Off? . Try toggling it. For some reason, when set to off, it let's the camera still take photo even though priority set to Focus (not release). Per my guess, it needed to hunt more, but setting was set Off.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Feb 05, 2015 08:20 |  #1649

Out of curiosity, of those with issues that sent their camera in, did any of you send in your lens also?

I tried following up with CPS, but the guy I have to speak with doesn't come in until 3:30. The only chance I have to exchange the body today is around lunch and today is my last day to do so. Kinda of in a quandary - exchange it and start over or send the 7d2/600/1.4/2x all in and let Canon sort it out? They've had it once with no appreciable better results.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kickflipkid687
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,074 posts
Likes: 151
Joined Jan 2014
     
Feb 05, 2015 08:46 |  #1650

This guy is getting some really great shots. Although I wonder what his keeper rate is.

https://www.flickr.com …761173624/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)


My Flickr page - https://www.flickr.com​/photos/86957042@N07/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,696,354 views & 2,734 likes for this thread, 331 members have posted to it and it is followed by 199 members.
7D Mark II - Focus Discussions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
532 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.