Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2014 (Wednesday) 14:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Mark II - Focus Discussions

 
rejay14
Goldmember
Avatar
1,064 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 610
Joined Mar 2009
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario
     
Feb 18, 2015 19:21 as a reply to  @ post 17438117 |  #1786

So you're saying that a more advanced system takes longer to acquire focus? Seems kinda backwards..


1DX Mark II, 5D Mark IV, 40D,Rebel XT :lol:, 70-200L 2.8 IS II, 100-400L IS II,24-105 II L, 100mmL 2.8 IS, 16-35L 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8L II, Sigma 50mm 1.4 Art, Sekonic 758DR, Pixma 9500 II, Pixma 9000 II, Think Tank Airport Accelerator v2.0, Canon 600EX-RT x 5, Profoto B1 x 4 with too many modifiers http:// …www.PrestigePhotoPro.c​om (external link) Portfolio (external link)
Concert Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Feb 18, 2015 20:28 |  #1787

rejay14 wrote in post #17438260 (external link)
So you're saying that a more advanced system takes longer to acquire focus? Seems kinda backwards..

People have had luck letting the tracking settle in. I personally find it unusual. I have a theory that there is something funky in the firmware that doesn't shut off the Af adjust, eat signal when shutter releases. It would explain those cases where nothing at all is in focus, yet has fast enough ss and Is is off.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rejay14
Goldmember
Avatar
1,064 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 610
Joined Mar 2009
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario
Post edited over 8 years ago by rejay14.
     
Feb 18, 2015 22:58 as a reply to  @ gschlact's post |  #1788

Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way...

BTW: compariosn images. The first is the 7DII, second is 5D3. Same settings in camera, all manual. I think these speak volumes:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/3/LQ_713736.jpg
Image hosted by forum (713736) © rejay14 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/3/LQ_713737.jpg
Image hosted by forum (713737) © rejay14 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

1DX Mark II, 5D Mark IV, 40D,Rebel XT :lol:, 70-200L 2.8 IS II, 100-400L IS II,24-105 II L, 100mmL 2.8 IS, 16-35L 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8L II, Sigma 50mm 1.4 Art, Sekonic 758DR, Pixma 9500 II, Pixma 9000 II, Think Tank Airport Accelerator v2.0, Canon 600EX-RT x 5, Profoto B1 x 4 with too many modifiers http:// …www.PrestigePhotoPro.c​om (external link) Portfolio (external link)
Concert Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
Post edited over 8 years ago by Frodge.
     
Feb 19, 2015 04:46 |  #1789

rejay14 wrote in post #17438522 (external link)
Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way...

BTW: compariosn images. The first is the 7DII, second is 5D3. Same settings in camera, all manual. I think these speak volumes:

Yeah, that picture is just totally oof. Not sure how long you can play around with it, my call is to return it and move on. I would give Canon a lot of credit if they publicly realized a problem and came up with a solution. Instead, they are pretending the problem doesn't exist, denying problems and or replacement in many cases. They're making people live without their $2000 or camera for months on end. Not sure what their end game is, but I'm sure they could potentially lose customers over this. I'll tell you what, if it weren't for the investment in lenses that most people have, many would have jumped ship already. Canon really needs to get their act together.
Now, I realize that a certain percentage of people may be using the camera incorrectly. But there is also a number of people that have been through multiple copies with no positive conclusion. My guess is if you went through 4-5 copies and still
cannot get sharp focus, it starts to reveal a systemic problem. The same goes with he 70d. The cries haven't been as loud from those owners, and my only fear is that they aren't as experienced. Then on top of all this, there are other forum members suggesting to not return the body for a refund, but to send it in to canon for repair. This, I don't get at all. Canon seems to be releasing new models too soon without enough field testing.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon-Chas
Member
Avatar
243 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 115
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Scotland
     
Feb 19, 2015 04:56 |  #1790

Maybe there is a batch of serial numbers which are faulty? Perhaps a list of faulty 7D MK2 serials would help identify which ones need replaced/recalled ?


Chas
http://www.wildfeather​s.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,422 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Feb 19, 2015 05:02 |  #1791

Well Canon have already lost a sale, I was thinking about upgrading from my 7D, but I feel there are just far too many people many who have tried multiple copies, that there is definitely a problem with this model, so I've decided not to bother and just stick with my 7D.

If Canon doesn't sort this pretty sharpish it stands to lose a lot of customers. You expect honesty from a manufacturer of their calibre.


Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 19, 2015 05:03 |  #1792

Canon-Chas wrote in post #17438785 (external link)
Maybe there is a batch of serial numbers which are faulty? Perhaps a list of faulty 7D MK2 serials would help identify which ones need replaced/recalled ?

I agree, and actually meant to mention this. Most companies, once they get enough flack, release some sort of serial #range and recall the units, fix them and everyone is satisfied. Canon seems very reluctant to do this now and in the last past. I follow all these new threads because They are the threads which point me to my next piece of equipment. The new bodies I'm reading about are telling me to stay away, far away. Customers ought to just return these and have all these shops send them all back to canon in bulk so they're forced to resolve the issue at their own expense. But yes, a recall is necessary. I just feel that if owners don't know what is causing this af issue, how can they ever feel comfortable with one of these bodies? Is it something that is just bad in the manufacturing process or something that just slowly goes out of spec from use? (Poor parts etc)


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LonelyBoy
Goldmember
1,482 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1004
Joined Oct 2014
     
Feb 19, 2015 05:43 |  #1793

artyman wrote in post #17438788 (external link)
Well Canon have already lost a sale, I was thinking about upgrading from my 7D, but I feel there are just far too many people many who have tried multiple copies, that there is definitely a problem with this model, so I've decided not to bother and just stick with my 7D.

If Canon doesn't sort this pretty sharpish it stands to lose a lot of customers. You expect honesty from a manufacturer of their calibre.

Same here; until we know what's going on with the 70D/ 7D2 I'm staying away from both. Sadly, that probably means I should stay away from the T6s as well. It seems like it could be a great value, depending on the ISO performance of that sensor, but not until I'm confident they've solved whatever difficulty they have with that 19-pt AF sensor. Weird that it's been dead reliable in the 7Dc.

Ah well, the 5D3 calls.


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/127590681@N03/ (external link)
I love a like, but feedback (including CC) is even better!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Feb 19, 2015 06:30 |  #1794

rejay14 wrote in post #17438522 (external link)
Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way...

BTW: compariosn images. The first is the 7DII, second is 5D3. Same settings in camera, all manual. I think these speak volumes:

What are the EXIF values for those images?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peter2516
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
27,244 posts
Gallery: 1094 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 34851
Joined Oct 2010
Location: State of Washington
     
Feb 19, 2015 10:04 |  #1795

rejay14 wrote in post #17438522 (external link)
Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way...

BTW: compariosn images. The first is the 7DII, second is 5D3. Same settings in camera, all manual. I think these speak volumes:

Wow that is OOF. My buddy who shoots with ef500mm mk2 told me that he was also getting OOF shots but he was able to dialed in after tweaking the camera default camera setting but I really don't know what he did and he ended up keeping his and that was his first copy.


Peter
http://www.flickriver.​com/photos/peterbangay​an (external link)
EOS 1Dx, EOS R6, EOS R7, 7D Mark I & II / EF 600mm f/4L IS USM MK II / EF70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM / EF100 -400 f4.5-5.6L USM/ EFS 10-22mm/EFS 17-55mm/EFS 18-200mm/Canon 1.4x II/Canon 2x III/ 430EXII / 580EXII.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peter2516
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
27,244 posts
Gallery: 1094 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 34851
Joined Oct 2010
Location: State of Washington
     
Feb 19, 2015 10:05 |  #1796

artyman wrote in post #17438788 (external link)
Well Canon have already lost a sale, I was thinking about upgrading from my 7D, but I feel there are just far too many people many who have tried multiple copies, that there is definitely a problem with this model, so I've decided not to bother and just stick with my 7D.

If Canon doesn't sort this pretty sharpish it stands to lose a lot of customers. You expect honesty from a manufacturer of their calibre.

+1.


Peter
http://www.flickriver.​com/photos/peterbangay​an (external link)
EOS 1Dx, EOS R6, EOS R7, 7D Mark I & II / EF 600mm f/4L IS USM MK II / EF70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM / EF100 -400 f4.5-5.6L USM/ EFS 10-22mm/EFS 17-55mm/EFS 18-200mm/Canon 1.4x II/Canon 2x III/ 430EXII / 580EXII.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Feb 19, 2015 10:36 |  #1797

Peter2516 wrote in post #17439084 (external link)
Wow that is OOF. My buddy who shoots with ef500mm mk2 told me that he was also getting OOF shots but he was able to dialed in after tweaking the camera default camera setting but I really don't know what he did and he ended up keeping his and that was his first copy.

I think part of the key is the AF tracking. I've found better success leaving it at the case setting rather than dialing it down. When this camera locks, it locks hard and is difficult to adjust, which is both like and unlike my 1Dx which locks hard, but can be adjusted if you miss focus. With my 7d2, results are better not dialing it down to help with tracking, but putting the pressure on yourself to do it right. I've also found the earlier you can lock on and start tracking, the better off you'll be.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Triplexbee
Member
Avatar
183 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 253
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Peterborough
     
Feb 19, 2015 10:44 |  #1798

My tuppence worth.

Day 1 with camera and 100-400ii straight out the box, rushed out to shoot with this new, focus on anything uber sports/wildlfe god in the making. Got home, 90% crud.
Day 2 spent MA
Day 3 day in the field 50% crud.
Day 4 day in the field 20% crud

Almost all of the crud after dialling in are attributable (sadly) to technique. As I am adjusting to the way this camera works and likes to be worked, I can only see the crud factor dropping further.

I'm not sure we are at the recall stage yet.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1806
Joined Nov 2013
     
Feb 19, 2015 11:08 |  #1799

huntersdad wrote in post #17439138 (external link)
I think part of the key is the AF tracking. I've found better success leaving it at the case setting rather than dialing it down. When this camera locks, it locks hard and is difficult to adjust, which is both like and unlike my 1Dx which locks hard, but can be adjusted if you miss focus. With my 7d2, results are better not dialing it down to help with tracking, but putting the pressure on yourself to do it right. I've also found the earlier you can lock on and start tracking, the better off you'll be.

Dummy me, not sure I understand what you mean by "dialing it down". Care to elaborate ?


You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
britt777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,148 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Texas
     
Feb 19, 2015 11:19 |  #1800

Just got off the phone with canon and after discussing the focusing system, they said I had a very good understanding of how it works and everything seemed set up perfectly. I sent in 4 images and they said it definitely seems to be a camera issue!!!! Shipping back to B&H today. What a bummer...tried everything I could to make this camera work. If the AF system could just work it would be an amazing camera....oh well not trying my luck with another body as I've seen to many others on their 3 & 4th, just don't have that kind of time....Very sad :oops:


Brittany
www.shutterprophotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,706,002 views & 2,734 likes for this thread, 331 members have posted to it and it is followed by 199 members.
7D Mark II - Focus Discussions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1780 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.