So you're saying that a more advanced system takes longer to acquire focus? Seems kinda backwards..
rejay14 Goldmember More info | So you're saying that a more advanced system takes longer to acquire focus? Seems kinda backwards.. 1DX Mark II, 5D Mark IV, 40D,Rebel XT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2015 20:28 | #1787 rejay14 wrote in post #17438260 So you're saying that a more advanced system takes longer to acquire focus? Seems kinda backwards.. People have had luck letting the tracking settle in. I personally find it unusual. I have a theory that there is something funky in the firmware that doesn't shut off the Af adjust, eat signal when shutter releases. It would explain those cases where nothing at all is in focus, yet has fast enough ss and Is is off.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rejay14 Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by rejay14. | Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way... Image hosted by forum (713736) © rejay14 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (713737) © rejay14 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 1DX Mark II, 5D Mark IV, 40D,Rebel XT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Frodge Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Frodge. | Feb 19, 2015 04:46 | #1789 rejay14 wrote in post #17438522 Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way... BTW: compariosn images. The first is the 7DII, second is 5D3. Same settings in camera, all manual. I think these speak volumes: Yeah, that picture is just totally oof. Not sure how long you can play around with it, my call is to return it and move on. I would give Canon a lot of credit if they publicly realized a problem and came up with a solution. Instead, they are pretending the problem doesn't exist, denying problems and or replacement in many cases. They're making people live without their $2000 or camera for months on end. Not sure what their end game is, but I'm sure they could potentially lose customers over this. I'll tell you what, if it weren't for the investment in lenses that most people have, many would have jumped ship already. Canon really needs to get their act together. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2015 04:56 | #1790 Maybe there is a batch of serial numbers which are faulty? Perhaps a list of faulty 7D MK2 serials would help identify which ones need replaced/recalled ? Chas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
artyman Sleepless in Hampshire More info | Feb 19, 2015 05:02 | #1791 Well Canon have already lost a sale, I was thinking about upgrading from my 7D, but I feel there are just far too many people many who have tried multiple copies, that there is definitely a problem with this model, so I've decided not to bother and just stick with my 7D. Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2015 05:03 | #1792 Canon-Chas wrote in post #17438785 Maybe there is a batch of serial numbers which are faulty? Perhaps a list of faulty 7D MK2 serials would help identify which ones need replaced/recalled ? I agree, and actually meant to mention this. Most companies, once they get enough flack, release some sort of serial #range and recall the units, fix them and everyone is satisfied. Canon seems very reluctant to do this now and in the last past. I follow all these new threads because They are the threads which point me to my next piece of equipment. The new bodies I'm reading about are telling me to stay away, far away. Customers ought to just return these and have all these shops send them all back to canon in bulk so they're forced to resolve the issue at their own expense. But yes, a recall is necessary. I just feel that if owners don't know what is causing this af issue, how can they ever feel comfortable with one of these bodies? Is it something that is just bad in the manufacturing process or something that just slowly goes out of spec from use? (Poor parts etc) _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2015 05:43 | #1793 artyman wrote in post #17438788 Well Canon have already lost a sale, I was thinking about upgrading from my 7D, but I feel there are just far too many people many who have tried multiple copies, that there is definitely a problem with this model, so I've decided not to bother and just stick with my 7D. If Canon doesn't sort this pretty sharpish it stands to lose a lot of customers. You expect honesty from a manufacturer of their calibre. Same here; until we know what's going on with the 70D/ 7D2 I'm staying away from both. Sadly, that probably means I should stay away from the T6s as well. It seems like it could be a great value, depending on the ISO performance of that sensor, but not until I'm confident they've solved whatever difficulty they have with that 19-pt AF sensor. Weird that it's been dead reliable in the 7Dc. https://www.flickr.com/photos/127590681@N03/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Feb 19, 2015 06:30 | #1794 rejay14 wrote in post #17438522 Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way... BTW: compariosn images. The first is the 7DII, second is 5D3. Same settings in camera, all manual. I think these speak volumes: What are the EXIF values for those images? Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peter2516 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 19, 2015 10:04 | #1795 rejay14 wrote in post #17438522 Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way... BTW: compariosn images. The first is the 7DII, second is 5D3. Same settings in camera, all manual. I think these speak volumes: Wow that is OOF. My buddy who shoots with ef500mm mk2 told me that he was also getting OOF shots but he was able to dialed in after tweaking the camera default camera setting but I really don't know what he did and he ended up keeping his and that was his first copy. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peter2516 Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 19, 2015 10:05 | #1796 artyman wrote in post #17438788 Well Canon have already lost a sale, I was thinking about upgrading from my 7D, but I feel there are just far too many people many who have tried multiple copies, that there is definitely a problem with this model, so I've decided not to bother and just stick with my 7D. If Canon doesn't sort this pretty sharpish it stands to lose a lot of customers. You expect honesty from a manufacturer of their calibre. +1. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
huntersdad Goldmember 4,870 posts Likes: 652 Joined Nov 2008 More info | Feb 19, 2015 10:36 | #1797 Peter2516 wrote in post #17439084 Wow that is OOF. My buddy who shoots with ef500mm mk2 told me that he was also getting OOF shots but he was able to dialed in after tweaking the camera default camera setting but I really don't know what he did and he ended up keeping his and that was his first copy. I think part of the key is the AF tracking. I've found better success leaving it at the case setting rather than dialing it down. When this camera locks, it locks hard and is difficult to adjust, which is both like and unlike my 1Dx which locks hard, but can be adjusted if you miss focus. With my 7d2, results are better not dialing it down to help with tracking, but putting the pressure on yourself to do it right. I've also found the earlier you can lock on and start tracking, the better off you'll be. Facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Triplexbee Member More info | Feb 19, 2015 10:44 | #1798 My tuppence worth.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2015 11:08 | #1799 huntersdad wrote in post #17439138 I think part of the key is the AF tracking. I've found better success leaving it at the case setting rather than dialing it down. When this camera locks, it locks hard and is difficult to adjust, which is both like and unlike my 1Dx which locks hard, but can be adjusted if you miss focus. With my 7d2, results are better not dialing it down to help with tracking, but putting the pressure on yourself to do it right. I've also found the earlier you can lock on and start tracking, the better off you'll be. Dummy me, not sure I understand what you mean by "dialing it down". Care to elaborate ? You can call me Ned
LOG IN TO REPLY |
britt777 Goldmember 1,148 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Texas More info | Feb 19, 2015 11:19 | #1800 Just got off the phone with canon and after discussing the focusing system, they said I had a very good understanding of how it works and everything seemed set up perfectly. I sent in 4 images and they said it definitely seems to be a camera issue!!!! Shipping back to B&H today. What a bummer...tried everything I could to make this camera work. If the AF system could just work it would be an amazing camera....oh well not trying my luck with another body as I've seen to many others on their 3 & 4th, just don't have that kind of time....Very sad Brittany
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1780 guests, 101 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||