Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2014 (Wednesday) 14:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Mark II - Focus Discussions

 
TenaCJed
Goldmember
Avatar
1,015 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 823
Joined May 2006
Location: Macomb County, MI
     
Feb 19, 2015 11:21 |  #1801

britt777 wrote in post #17439197 (external link)
Just got off the phone with canon and after discussing the focusing system, they said I had a very good understanding of how it works and everything seemed set up perfectly. I sent in 4 images and they said it definitely seems to be a camera issue!!!! Shipping back to B&H today. What a bummer...tried everything I could to make this camera work. If the AF system could just work it would be an amazing camera....oh well not trying my luck with another body as I've seen to many others on their 3 & 4th, just don't have that kind of time....Very sad :oops:

why not send it in to Canon to be serviced? Seems like they would be able to take care of it, especially since they agree that there is a problem?


John W
C&C always welcome
What a long... strange trip it's been...
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 19, 2015 11:34 |  #1802

Triplexbee wrote in post #17439144 (external link)
My tuppence worth.

Day 1 with camera and 100-400ii straight out the box, rushed out to shoot with this new, focus on anything uber sports/wildlfe god in the making. Got home, 90% crud.
Day 2 spent MA
Day 3 day in the field 50% crud.
Day 4 day in the field 20% crud

Almost all of the crud after dialling in are attributable (sadly) to technique. As I am adjusting to the way this camera works and likes to be worked, I can only see the crud factor dropping further.

I'm not sure we are at the recall stage yet.

There are at least two different things going on here.
1. People that are not used to their new cameras an gettig better and better percentages of keepers as they use the body.
2. People that have bad cameras, th have had multiple bad cameras, that have oof shots like the football jersey above.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Feb 19, 2015 11:47 |  #1803

rejay14 wrote in post #17438522 (external link)
Interesting..what is eat signal? Tell me more about AF adjust please. Please excuse the internet if I sound sarcastic, it's not meant that way...

BTW: compariosn images. The first is the 7DII, second is 5D3. Same settings in camera, all manual. I think these speak volumes:

We need your help so that we can help you.
Image posting to the Forum without a link to the Original jpg doesn't help us decipher sharpness / focus issues.
1. had you MFA'ed your lens on the 7dii? (5diii values are irrelevant) . The MFA places the focal plan where intended.
2. what shutter speed and focal length on the image you shared?
3. was IS (image stablization) on or off?
4. First / second shutter priority, Focus or Release?
5. the image is soft for sure, but it appears there might be some front focus as well as some motion (IS / technique / other?) Shutter speed, FL, and IS values will help.
6. which Case were you set on and what were parameter values?

Don't give up yet.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
Post edited over 8 years ago by Frodge.
     
Feb 19, 2015 11:54 |  #1804

TenaCJed wrote in post #17439204 (external link)
why not send it in to Canon to be serviced? Seems like they would be able to take care of it, especially since they agree that there is a problem?

No offense, but these are close to $2000. This has to be the worse thing owners with bad copies can do. Because once they're out of their return period, the continue carousel of sending the body in and fetti it returned seems never ending. Let the dealers send them back.

Canons research and quality control shouldn't be done in the customers dime.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TenaCJed
Goldmember
Avatar
1,015 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 823
Joined May 2006
Location: Macomb County, MI
     
Feb 19, 2015 11:58 |  #1805

Frodge wrote in post #17439257 (external link)
No offense, but these are close to $2000. This has to be the worse thing owners with bad copies can do. Because once they're out of their return period, the continue carousel of sending the body in and fetti it returned seems never ending. Let the dealers send them back.

Sorry, but you are on the negative side of this issue, and just continue to tell people to avoid it all together. Now that is your opinion, and you are more than welcome to it.

I have seen plenty of people on this forum do exactly what I was asking about, and were very happy after they did this. I myself did this as well, and so far I have seen improvement after receiving it back, only went out once so far.

To me the whole sending it back to dealer over and over does not really help, and adds to the frustration. It seems that most people that have sent theirs in to Canon instead have been much after with the ending result!


John W
C&C always welcome
What a long... strange trip it's been...
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Feb 19, 2015 12:07 |  #1806

I agree with sending it to Canon. If they don't fix it then return it. But giving up on it shouldn't be an option.

Should you send it to Canon, make sure you include sample images - printed or on disc. Give them as much info as possible to work with.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 19, 2015 12:12 |  #1807

huntersdad wrote in post #17439279 (external link)
I agree with sending it to Canon. If they don't fix it then return it. But giving up on it shouldn't be an option.

Should you send it to Canon, make sure you include sample images - printed or on disc. Give them as much info as possible to work with.

How can to test this, realize you have a problem, send it to canon, get it returned, retested all in the return window? I think the dealers should be keeping track of why the are being returned and sending them back on pallets. I think canon would get the message when a place like b&h send 200 back at a time. Much more effective. I also think a lot of you guys have much more expendable money than I do


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,511 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51020
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Feb 19, 2015 12:17 |  #1808

Frodge wrote in post #17439292 (external link)
How can to test this, realize you have a problem, send it to canon, get it returned, retested all in the return window? I think the dealers should be keeping track of why the are being returned and sending them back on pallets. I think canon would get the message when a place like b&h send 200 back at a time. Much more effective. I also think a lot of you guys have much more expendable money than I do

I bought mine at a high volume retailer. They told me none of theirs had been returned.

It seems to me the problems with products are hyped up here at POTN - as well as the good things. Stay cool. There are problems, but not that many.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to Focus on Photography (https://focusonphotogr​aphy.community.forum/ (external link)) where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LonelyBoy
Goldmember
1,482 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1004
Joined Oct 2014
     
Feb 19, 2015 12:17 |  #1809

TenaCJed wrote in post #17439263 (external link)
Sorry, but you are on the negative side of this issue, and just continue to tell people to avoid it all together. Now that is your opinion, and you are more than welcome to it.

I have seen plenty of people on this forum do exactly what I was asking about, and were very happy after they did this. I myself did this as well, and so far I have seen improvement after receiving it back, only went out once so far.

To me the whole sending it back to dealer over and over does not really help, and adds to the frustration. It seems that most people that have sent theirs in to Canon instead have been much after with the ending result!

It all depends on your risk appetite, and how you value time. If your time is valuable, and you have a low risk appetite, then sending it in is a bad idea. There are plenty of people who've had issues persist through multiple repair attempts.


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/127590681@N03/ (external link)
I love a like, but feedback (including CC) is even better!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 19, 2015 12:21 |  #1810

LonelyBoy wrote in post #17439301 (external link)
It all depends on your risk appetite, and how you value time. If your time is valuable, and you have a low risk appetite, then sending it in is a bad idea. There are plenty of people who've had issues persist through multiple repair attempts.

I think this about explains it all. I agree 100%


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
britt777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,148 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Texas
     
Feb 19, 2015 13:24 |  #1811

TenaCJed wrote in post #17439204 (external link)
why not send it in to Canon to be serviced? Seems like they would be able to take care of it, especially since they agree that there is a problem?

I chose to return because I didn't want to be out almost $2000. Like I said I have seen people on 3rd & 4th bodies and that seems to be a big problem with this body. I chose to take Frodges advice and get out why I still can.


Brittany
www.shutterprophotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bianchi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,773 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 29513
Joined Jan 2010
Location: USA
     
Feb 19, 2015 13:26 |  #1812

Ok let me brake it down >>> return to Vendor or Canon if having issues

1) Know your return policy from the vendor you purchased from

2) If you decide to have Canon take a look, make sure there will be enough time to return to vendor, if the problem is not resolved after receiving back from Canon

3) Otherwise your stuck with it


My Gear flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
britt777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,148 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Texas
     
Feb 19, 2015 13:36 |  #1813

Bianchi wrote in post #17439375 (external link)
Ok let me brake it down >>> return to Vendor or Canon if having issues

1) Know your return policy from the vendor you purchased from

2) If you decide to have Canon take a look, make sure there will be enough time to return to vendor, if the problem is not resolved after receiving back from Canon

3) Otherwise your stuck with it


Exactly. I only had 6 days left to return to vendor so I chose to just return. Not enough time to have serviced. Nor do I have the time or patience as LonelyBoy stated.


Brittany
www.shutterprophotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bianchi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,773 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 29513
Joined Jan 2010
Location: USA
     
Feb 19, 2015 13:54 |  #1814

LonelyBoy wrote in post #17439301 (external link)
It all depends on your risk appetite, and how you value time. If your time is valuable, and you have a low risk appetite, then sending it in is a bad idea. There are plenty of people who've had issues persist through multiple repair attempts.


Which can put you out of vendor return period, and then you are stuck with it... Plus all the AGGADA


My Gear flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Feb 19, 2015 14:05 |  #1815

Frodge wrote in post #17439292 (external link)
How can to test this, realize you have a problem, send it to canon, get it returned, retested all in the return window? I think the dealers should be keeping track of why the are being returned and sending them back on pallets. I think canon would get the message when a place like b&h send 200 back at a time. Much more effective. I also think a lot of you guys have much more expendable money than I do

I bought one, had to wait 2 weeks to use it, sent it to Canon, returned still with issues and I exchanged it. Not impossible.

To be honest, I think the issue is something either so small that no one sees it, something that only affects certain modes or lenses or something that the techs just can't find. In my case, my issue was with my 600II. Canon VA doesn't even have a 600II to test with it and heaven knows how they test tracking to simulate moving birds. But, to me, doesn't matter. I sent you a camera with CPS confirmed issue, you didn't fix it, I'll exchange it, have the one you didn't fix back. FWIW, I do think they are going to find a serial number problem. Wish I could find the numbers for the 3 I have returned.

I agree getting a load of them returned will open some eyes. Between Doug Brown and myself, they have 6 coming back and I'm sure it's more than that.

But, I encourage everyone to take their time with the camera, make sure you read the AF guide for the 7D2 and understand the focus system is unlike any other system Canon has put out. You can't take it out of the box and go shoot. You need to dial in your lenses and play with it, see it react before really pushing it. As I have said before, when it locks, it locks and if you lock on the wrong spot, you're going to get bad results. Same with shutter speed, got to keep them fairly high if handholding.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,705,986 views & 2,734 likes for this thread, 331 members have posted to it and it is followed by 199 members.
7D Mark II - Focus Discussions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
2106 guests, 96 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.