Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2014 (Wednesday) 14:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Mark II - Focus Discussions

 
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,684 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16809
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
May 15, 2015 10:03 |  #2551

If I was into mfa and suspected canon may have done something to the focus other than just the announced 70-200' I'd go back to 0 and try it. If it needed it then I would mfa again even if the original mfa settings did not change after the update - which they should not have.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
someone0
Senior Member
436 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jul 2014
     
May 15, 2015 10:26 |  #2552

McNeese72 wrote in post #17557414 (external link)
I don't think you are understanding his question. I think he means, if you have MAF'd your lenses and if Canon snuck some unannounced changes into the firmware update to fix some of the focus problems some people were having, will that throw off your present MAF settings and will you have to redo the MAF to new settings for your lenses?

In other words, will your present MAF settings still be good or will you have to change them.

I for one will double check my MAF settings for my lenses.

Doc

That is exactly what I was trying to say as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregDunn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 132
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Indiana
     
May 15, 2015 10:35 |  #2553

Considering that the MFA has entirely to do with corrections for physical tolerances in the manufacture of the camera and lens which have not been compensated by the existing lens calibration / setup (if any), why would a firmware change which does not alter MFA settings require you to reset MFA settings? Sure, MFA settings may change with time, temperature, wear, etc. so it might not be a bad idea to check them, but I doubt very much that the firmware update itself would have any effect - especially since MFA was not called out in the description.


Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50964
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
May 15, 2015 10:40 |  #2554

GregDunn wrote in post #17557471 (external link)
Considering that the MFA has entirely to do with corrections for physical tolerances in the manufacture of the camera and lens which have not been compensated by the existing lens calibration / setup (if any), why would a firmware change which does not alter MFA settings require you to reset MFA settings? Sure, MFA settings may change with time, temperature, wear, etc. so it might not be a bad idea to check them, but I doubt very much that the firmware update itself would have any effect - especially since MFA was not called out in the description.

But we like to tinker with MFA.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lupo-Lobo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,103 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 420
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Texas
     
May 15, 2015 10:54 |  #2555

Updated to 1.0.4 a couple days ago and image previews on the back LCD looked promising. Now that I have put a few files through LR 6 it feels almost like a new camera to me (as far as output) ... thus

.... a duck

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/05/3/LQ_727830.jpg
Image hosted by forum (727830) © Lupo-Lobo [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Lupo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon-Chas
Member
Avatar
243 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 115
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Scotland
Post edited over 8 years ago by Canon-Chas.
     
May 15, 2015 12:17 |  #2556

McNeese72 wrote in post #17557414 (external link)
I don't think you are understanding his question. I think he means, if you have MAF'd your lenses and if Canon snuck some unannounced changes into the firmware update to fix some of the focus problems some people were having, will that throw off your present MAF settings and will you have to redo the MAF to new settings for your lenses?

In other words, will your present MAF settings still be good or will you have to change them.

I for one will double check my MAF settings for my lenses.

Doc

I fully understand his question, all my images are razor sharp after the 1.04 update, no change to MFA, my MFA settings are still good. My camera was front focusing and still is, no physical changes whatsoever.
Give some credit to Canon, if the Firmware update necessitated doing an MFA on all your lenses again they would have said so.


Chas
http://www.wildfeather​s.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
May 15, 2015 12:53 as a reply to  @ Canon-Chas's post |  #2557

I updated to the 1.04 and my results were less than promising. So much so I ended up ordering a second body to see if the new one will be better. Ugh




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JM45ACP
Senior Member
Avatar
715 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 639
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Ct. USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by JM45ACP.
     
May 15, 2015 13:11 |  #2558

I updated to the 1.04 and my results were less than promising. So much so I ended up ordering a second body to see if the new one will be better. Ugh

I had the same experience the update didn't seem to change anything I took about 30 pictures this morning and all were soft that's why I just brought home my third body. The sales guy tried about 4 different L glass lenses and he couldn't get a sharp picture either one of them was the 70-200mm f2.8 listed in the FW update. I'm not sure if I'm going to update immediately or wit.

I for one will double check my MAF settings for my lenses.

I did the same thing and the telephoto setting which I had to originally set to a + 9 changed to a +4 I ran the calibration 3 times to verify.



5D MARK IV== 7D Mark II==7D == EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM == EF 100mm f/2.8LMacro==70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM == EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM UD == EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM==Speedlite 430 EX II PHOTO EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1219
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
May 15, 2015 13:17 |  #2559

software is not going to do anything - if you are having major problems it is a hardware and / or assembly problem

there are way too many cameras taking sharp images at an acceptable rate for it to be software

return the camera and try again - there is clearly a bad batch of 'something' or an early assembly issue which hasn't been ironed out yet


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,684 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16809
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
May 15, 2015 13:54 |  #2560

digital paradise wrote in post #17557430 (external link)
If I was into mfa and suspected canon may have done something to the focus other than just the announced 70-200' I'd go back to 0 and try it. If it needed it then I would mfa again even if the original mfa settings did not change after the update - which they should not have.

wallstreetoneil wrote in post #17557678 (external link)
software is not going to do anything - if you are having major problems it is a hardware and / or assembly problem

there are way too many cameras taking sharp images at an acceptable rate for it to be software

return the camera and try again - there is clearly a bad batch of 'something' or an early assembly issue which hasn't been ironed out yet

Zactly. Canon Rumors stated the canon engineers were not happy with the focus. That could have meant they wanted to enhance something across the board which was not listed or it may have been specific to the 70-200. Maybe some got out with a FW glitch that they caught early during production Who knows..

There have been mixed results all over the place from super improvement to nothing at all. A lot of this is subjective but if someone feels it made a difference I believe it. Perhaps any that were already dialed from correctly from Canon may not show very much. Some that were a tad off due to programming might be showing more and ones like you said have a serious issue will not help..

Since it was not formally announced we will never know. Since my canon tune up I don't expect too much but they may have snuck in a few Changes that improved AF lock, tracking or something like that

I know if I ran canon I would avoid formally announcing any focus issues unless I had no choice.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Methodical
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,894 posts
Gallery: 239 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 3667
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Where ever I lay my hat is my home
Post edited over 8 years ago by Methodical.
     
May 15, 2015 14:46 |  #2561

GregDunn wrote in post #17557471 (external link)
Considering that the MFA has entirely to do with corrections for physical tolerances in the manufacture of the camera and lens which have not been compensated by the existing lens calibration / setup (if any), why would a firmware change which does not alter MFA settings require you to reset MFA settings? Sure, MFA settings may change with time, temperature, wear, etc. so it might not be a bad idea to check them, but I doubt very much that the firmware update itself would have any effect - especially since MFA was not called out in the description.


Canon-Chas wrote in post #17557605 (external link)
I fully understand his question, all my images are razor sharp after the 1.04 update, no change to MFA, my MFA settings are still good. My camera was front focusing and still is, no physical changes whatsoever.
Give some credit to Canon, if the Firmware update necessitated doing an MFA on all your lenses again they would have said so.

You just never know. I refill my own ink cartridges for Canon printers and they've sent updates to disable this. Again, you never know, which is why I asked.


Gear
MethodicalImages (external link)
Flickr (external link)
"Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark, professionals built the Titanic"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LJ3Jim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,647 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 3165
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
May 15, 2015 15:18 |  #2562

After the firmware upgrade, I chose to reset MFA to zero on my lenses (only had a couple of adjustments anyhow). I'll do some shooting over the next couple of weeks and see if I need to put some MFA back.

With the 7D2, I found that MFA was somewhat erratic. Sometimes -3 would do, other times -7. I hope to find that the new firmware establishes consistency.

Regards, Jim


Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeivan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,468 posts
Gallery: 455 photos
Likes: 6273
Joined Aug 2005
Location: houston
     
May 15, 2015 16:11 |  #2563

After updating firmware to 1.04, I checked my MFA, which was +4. It looked to be back focusing so I changed it to +1 which produced front focus. I settled on +3. This slight change could be the update or could be my poor eyes. I've had enough fun for today. Time for a wee dram.


MIKEIVAN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,684 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16809
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
May 15, 2015 16:23 |  #2564

+-3 are very reasonable numbers to me. There is going to be normal manufacturing deviation in the lens and camera.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
May 15, 2015 21:05 as a reply to  @ GregDunn's post |  #2565

Greg,
Theoretically, the reason you state is true, but it isn't at the exclusion of other reasons. Any calculation that might have been used to determine initial focus position and was found to have an error, could require new/differemt mfa value.
I read elsewhere that after update, the photos needed different values for his lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,696,314 views & 2,734 likes for this thread, 331 members have posted to it and it is followed by 199 members.
7D Mark II - Focus Discussions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
528 guests, 153 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.