Funny you mention this. I was just telling a friend the other day how on my 1D4 my tracking sensitivity was at -1 and I had to set my 7D2 to +1 to match it.
I've only done any serious shooting with 1.04 so I can't comment on the before and after. As a little background to my statement above.....
I shoot karts and one of the shots I take is karts head on in a turn or right before turning. I generally just hold AF-ON and click off on the shutter when the karts are framed the way I want. The camera is nearly stationary. So it was during this scenario in which -1 on the 1D4 was sufficient for snapping the focus to the next kart; which could be 1-3 kart lengths behind the one leaving the frame.
I mistaking assumed that -1 on the 7D2 would be equal. Boy was I wrong. I watched out of focus karts enter and leave the frame. I didn't have much of a problem if I stopped and restarted focus but I'd rather avoid the finger cha-cha so I ended up at +1 on the 7D2 before it equaled the 1D4.
That does not surprise me at all. Quite contrary, given all the different hardware between just those two cameras it would be near darn impossible to come up with some objective measure for such setting. Some models, for example, use more voltage for lens drive making the lens focus faster (and better)...so that alone would have big impact on it. Heck, I would be surprised if the settings in those two cameras have much in common beyond the visual representation of the scale. If I tell you that my room is 5 arm-lengths wide and you tell me that yours is 5 arm-length wide as well, are we to conclude that our rooms are of same width? All things considered, very unlikely. I would wager the same about the sensitivity scale in those two cameras. But it is nice to actually take the speculation out of things whenever possible and you did just that. Thank you.



