Good morning gschlact, as you know the near and super far seemed ok. I tested it before the return to cannon and after using a second 7DII and 100-400LII twice with and without canon 1.4III and with a second 1.4III ( I own two ) I tested both against each other and found mine to be very inferior, I then did a reset removing the batt closing the door and pressing the shutter button to remove any remaining power, reinstalled the batt and leaving all settings at default case 1, no modifications to any setting and compared the two cameras and lens shooting the same abject at the same time really with Identical settings page for page in the menu. settings on each camera were checked to be the exact same, both cameras had full batt's and they were found to be very comparable in image quality and sharpness, I can not say what or how this all came about, I can only tell you what I saw. I am a tech form the past but not of canon camera's so I under stand the apprehension on both sides. I guess thats why when I hear the words test I cringe, in the past for me that meant 10's of hundreds of waisted hour's knowing all the while a board was faulty and needed replacing. I would these days rather have some other tech have to grind through the hours of comparing data. my passion is in the wild life around me. ya I know I have to feed that to the site slowly as well. I may have to invite someone to come with me so they to can post the thousands of image they will get of the red fur. then I can sit back and laugh at the people poking fun at them for a while.
I think now at this point I need a trip back to my little friends and see just how things perform. as everyone knows the real answer is in the images you get in the field not shooting paper
Archibald I'm sure you do,
Enjoy the fresh air.
-Guy




