Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2014 (Wednesday) 14:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Mark II - Focus Discussions

 
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Jan 03, 2016 17:33 |  #5581

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17843031 (external link)
There may be an AF issue that plagues some 7D2s. Who knows for sure? I know last night, I had several photos where I was tracking somebody making a dash for the basket, and I had several where it seemed like NOTHING was in focus. I had the crowd in the stands all the way to a player near me, and when I go through the image, I can find where there is a plane of the frame that is mostly in focus, however, nothing was sharp.
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=178​43031&i=i235062816
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=178​43031&i=i184244084
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

I would say after following this thread, that this is probably what others were seeing. It at least sounds similar. It was would somewhat concern me that at 1/2000 nothing was very sharpnin any of the frames.I was always a believer that this problem is bigger than the naysayers think. My opinion is forms from multiple people having multiple bodies with this problem


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 03, 2016 17:36 as a reply to  @ Frodge's post |  #5582

I may go back to firmware 1.0.4 and see if the situation is improved. It is hard to tell, I also have to look at my first and second priority settings for AF to make sure it says focus for both. There are many different AF settings, and one can get lost in all the settings to find that it is nothing more than a series of settings that was causing the issue.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Jan 03, 2016 17:48 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #5583

I don't know the ins and outs of the 7dii settings. It almost sounds too complex to a degree. I am not at all saying you are incorrect, but at 1/2000, there should be something sharp in the frame, just from my experience. Hopefully its something simple you can sort out.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 03, 2016 17:53 |  #5584

Frodge wrote in post #17843130 (external link)
I don't know the ins and outs of the 7dii settings. It almost sounds too complex to a degree. I am not at all saying you are incorrect, but at 1/2000, there should be something sharp in the frame, just from my experience. Hopefully its something simple you can sort out.

The 7D2 has a 1D-like setup as does the 5D3. If you shoot with a 1D, you have many different settings, you can either put priority on FPS or on focus, etc, for example. There are 3 or 4 menus just for AF settings. I am very comfortable with the amount of configurability, but each generation seems to require a bit of research to get the right combination. I will see if I can find one of my binned images where I see my concern depicted.

Here is one such shot: https://teamspeed.smug​mug.com …ics/7D2-Tests/i-9z26Bj5/O (external link)

It seems that the floor several feet back might have focus, which means the lens was shifting to a new AF point (probably to the crowd) as the shot was being taken. This leads me to believe my first/second priorities might need tweaked, or since I had 8 point expansion turned on, they decided to take over because something in the crowd caught the camera's "attention".


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Jan 03, 2016 21:18 |  #5585

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17843023 (external link)
I am not sure. I use DPP and my own recipes wrapped around Imagenomic/Noiseware.

Per my comments earlier, here is a sample ISO 12800 from the game last night. This is a JPG right out of the camera, full size, then a 100% crop.
Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=178​43023&i=i264982187
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by TeamSpeed in
./showthread.php?p=178​43023&i=i235092605
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

I saw the two comparison shots. I think you definitely needed 2-4 clicks of +sharpening for the in-camera jpeg. Yes, it's noise was already worse than your processed raw, but possibly might have more facial sharpness with camera sharpness processing than your resulting raw.

Unfortunately, it isn't quite my method.
Maybe I'll send you a shot one of these days to process the cr2 and along with it, my jpeg I processed from the SooC jpeg. At least to me, it would be interesting to see any difference.

I break my higher ISO photos into 3 methods
A. Absolute best processing which might entail painting nr onto background and separate value for subject.
B. Quick global nr + masked sharpness
C. Don't bother with any jpeg for Web viewing.

Do you handle a and b differently in your equivalents.

Guy




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Jan 03, 2016 21:55 |  #5586

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17843031 (external link)
There may be an AF issue that plagues some 7D2s. Who knows for sure? I know last night, I had several photos where I was tracking somebody making a dash for the basket, and I had several where it seemed like NOTHING was in focus. I had the crowd in the stands all the way to a player near me, and when I go through the image, I can find where there is a plane of the frame that is mostly in focus, however, nothing was sharp.

This shouldn't happen, especially when the IS is turned off, and I am shooting at 1/2000th. This tells me that the issue, if there is one, has something to do with the lens assembly being driven even as the shutter is being opened and closed. This is not a good situation.

The other explanation is related to some of the comments provided back from, Canon repair centers related to Azf/mirror box fix or replacement. To me it would indicate some mechanical issue during servo tracking and high fps. . Was you specific shot during high fps?

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17843031 (external link)
It is the only conclusion I can come up with on several of my photos last night. I also just installed 1.0.5. I might go back to 1.0.4. I won't rule out an issue, and again IMO if there is a problem, it is that the lens is being driven while the frame is being exposed. I have done this for years now, and 1/2000th is enough to stop sweat in the air on a hit, and I should not have an image where there is an area that is somewhat in focus in the image, but even that isn't very clear.

Some people claim that moving from 1.04 to 1.05 created the same result, soft image even at plane of focus on target.
Keep us posted please.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Jan 03, 2016 21:59 |  #5587

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17843118 (external link)
I may go back to firmware 1.0.4 and see if the situation is improved. It is hard to tell, I also have to look at my first and second priority settings for AF to make sure it says focus for both. There are many different AF settings, and one can get lost in all the settings to find that it is nothing more than a series of settings that was causing the issue.

Fwiw- I think it was on FM, that one person thought his turning off of ITR helped this situation. He however was able to notice a twitchiness of servo even pointing at a static high contrast object. I wouldn't put high likelihood, but easy enough to do quick test shots. Also, I realize it isn't even pertinent for non Zone modes, but this is what he observed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Jan 03, 2016 22:02 |  #5588

I would think if there is a mechanical issue, I would see problems all the time, but I am not. I had a couple of 1D3s, and one of them needed the mirror box replaced, so I am a bit experienced with what that issue produces. As I change a few of the settings, the performance became better, like going to 4 expansion instead of 8. I will see what changing the 1st/2nd priorities to focus will do for me, but that will be another week yet.

Here are the results (external link) from last night, all at ISO 6400 or higher, I believe. There are some good shots amidst the average ones.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,785 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16885
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Post edited over 7 years ago by digital paradise.
     
Jan 03, 2016 22:03 |  #5589

Frodge wrote in post #17843130 (external link)
I don't know the ins and outs of the 7dii settings. It almost sounds too complex to a degree. I am not at all saying you are incorrect, but at 1/2000, there should be something sharp in the frame, just from my experience. Hopefully its something simple you can sort out.

Not really. If you break down how the components work it is pretty simple. It only does a few main things and rest are tweaks. If you're doing everything right it either focuses or it doesn't, especially a veteran shooting static objects.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RodS57
Goldmember
1,484 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 1748
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Eastern Canada
     
Jan 03, 2016 22:05 |  #5590

gschlact wrote in post #17843479 (external link)
Fwiw- I think it was on FM, that one person thought his turning off of ITR helped this situation. He however was able to notice a twitchiness of servo even pointing at a static high contrast object. I wouldn't put high likelihood, but easy enough to do quick test shots. Also, I realize it isn't even pertinent for non Zone modes, but this is what he observed.

I haven't touched ITR but I do get the AF twitching in AI servo when used on a static object. Focus won't settle. Don't think TS had this issue at a game.

Rod


>>> Pictures? What pictures? <<<<

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
Post edited over 7 years ago by gschlact.
     
Jan 03, 2016 22:06 |  #5591

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17843140 (external link)
The 7D2 has a 1D-like setup as does the 5D3. If you shoot with a 1D, you have many different settings, you can either put priority on FPS or on focus, etc, for example. There are 3 or 4 menus just for AF settings. I am very comfortable with the amount of configurability, but each generation seems to require a bit of research to get the right combination. I will see if I can find one of my binned images where I see my concern depicted.

Here is one such shot: https://teamspeed.smug​mug.com …ics/7D2-Tests/i-9z26Bj5/O (external link)

It seems that the floor several feet back might have focus, which means the lens was shifting to a new AF point (probably to the crowd) as the shot was being taken. This leads me to believe my first/second priorities might need tweaked, or since I had 8 point expansion turned on, they decided to take over because something in the crowd caught the camera's "attention".

TS,
I tend to believe as you indicate in this last paragraph.(Rogue contrast picked up somewhere under the active Af point(s). It is One of the reasons I often shoot Spot focus for sports, with quite successful tracking. These uniforms with their letter place, eat etc would / should be fine for contrast.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,785 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16885
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jan 03, 2016 22:06 |  #5592

RodS57 wrote in post #17843492 (external link)
I haven't touched ITR but I do get the AF twitching in AI servo when used on a static object. Focus won't settle. Don't think TS had this issue at a game.

Rod

ITR only works in the 3 zone modes.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Jan 03, 2016 22:07 |  #5593

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17843486 (external link)
I would think if there is a mechanical issue, I would see problems all the time, but I am not. I had a couple of 1D3s, and one of them needed the mirror box replaced, so I am a bit experienced with what that issue produces. As I change a few of the settings, the performance became better, like going to 4 expansion instead of 8. I will see what changing the 1st/2nd priorities to focus will do for me, but that will be another week yet.

Here are the results (external link) from last night, all at ISO 6400 or higher, I believe. There are some good shots amidst the average ones.

I agree.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Jan 03, 2016 22:10 |  #5594

RodS57 wrote in post #17843492 (external link)
I haven't touched ITR but I do get the AF twitching in AI servo when used on a static object. Focus won't settle. Don't think TS had this issue at a game.

Rod

Rod,
Twitching is NOT good.
Did you try reverting to 1.04 firmware?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
1,318 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 487
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chicago 'burbs
     
Jan 03, 2016 22:12 |  #5595

digital paradise wrote in post #17843497 (external link)
ITR only works in the 3 zone modes.

I know. I was only repeating what was claimed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,705,973 views & 2,734 likes for this thread, 331 members have posted to it and it is followed by 199 members.
7D Mark II - Focus Discussions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1342 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.