Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 13 Nov 2014 (Thursday) 00:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Cons of large modifier? (Other than size)

 
quadwing
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Nov 13, 2014 00:08 |  #1

Hi POTN,

I purchased and received a Fotodiox 60" octabox tonight. It's freaking huge. Really freaking huge. The size I don't care about if it produces good light, which it seems it does. But are there any cons to using large light modifiers other than size/weight/etc.?


Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sdipirro
Goldmember
Avatar
2,207 posts
Likes: 46
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 13, 2014 13:28 |  #2

Sometimes you actually do want some light fall-off and more control over the light than you can get with a really big modifier. I tend to use my big modifiers for fill and my smaller ones as key lights most of the time.


Cameras: 1DX, 1D4, 20D, 10D, S90, G2
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm, 16-35mm f2.8L II, 24-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L IS, 300mm f2.8L IS, 200mm f2L IS, 50mm f1.4, 50mm f1.2L, 85mm f1.2L, 1.4x TC, 2x TC, 500D macro, Zeiss 21mm
Lighting: 580EX, Elinchrom 600 RX's, D-Lite 4's, ABR800, 74" Eli Octa, 100cm/70cm DOs, Photoflex Medium Octa and reflectors, PW's, Lastolite Hilite, Newton Di400CR bracket

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Nov 13, 2014 13:37 |  #3

sdipirro wrote in post #17269862 (external link)
Sometimes you actually do want some light fall-off and more control over the light than you can get with a really big modifier. I tend to use my big modifiers for fill and my smaller ones as key lights most of the time.

I also find controlling those huge ass specular highlights is sometimes an issue too. More so when the light is very close.


Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Nov 13, 2014 13:45 |  #4

sdipirro wrote in post #17269862 (external link)
Sometimes you actually do want some light fall-off and more control over the light than you can get with a really big modifier. I tend to use my big modifiers for fill and my smaller ones as key lights most of the time.

Same here. I find that really big modifiers can be too big for single subject portraits. The light is so soft it becomes flat. You'll start questioning whether or not the image is sharp. ;)


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Nov 13, 2014 17:05 |  #5

I wish I had made this thread when I started working with modifiers. I was always thinking bigger is better but its certainly not true.


Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Nov 13, 2014 17:09 |  #6

Yeah, I consider that lesson well paid for. I have a 7ft octabox that I haven't used in years.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
quadwing
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Nov 13, 2014 18:53 |  #7

Scatterbrained wrote in post #17270323 (external link)
Yeah, I consider that lesson well paid for. I have a 7ft octabox that I haven't used in years.

I have a 5 foot hah.

Anyway, I'm not really understanding what light falloff is. I just know when light looks good. Could someone guide me to a resource (with image examples) of light falloff?

I honestly bought it larger so that I could get more distance between the subject and light and still have good light. I'm not sure that quite works though.


Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FJ ­ LOVE
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,883 posts
Likes: 82
Joined Nov 2006
Location: barrie ont. ca
     
Nov 13, 2014 19:04 |  #8

quadwing wrote in post #17270564 (external link)
I have a 5 foot hah.

Anyway, I'm not really understanding what light falloff is. I just know when light looks good. Could someone guide me to a resource (with image examples) of light falloff?

I honestly bought it larger so that I could get more distance between the subject and light and still have good light. I'm not sure that quite works though.

this may help a bit

http://www.profoto.com …ed-look-at-light-shapers/ (external link)


DILLIGAF about your bicycle or your gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FJ ­ LOVE
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,883 posts
Likes: 82
Joined Nov 2006
Location: barrie ont. ca
     
Nov 13, 2014 19:05 |  #9

Scatterbrained wrote in post #17270323 (external link)
Yeah, I consider that lesson well paid for. I have a 7ft octabox that I haven't used in years.

i bought a grid for mine, improved things tremendously :D


DILLIGAF about your bicycle or your gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Nov 13, 2014 19:07 |  #10

FJ LOVE wrote in post #17270585 (external link)
i bought a grid for mine, improved things tremendously :D

Mine came with a grid. Still too darn big for portraits in my tiny loft. :confused:


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Nov 13, 2014 19:24 |  #11

quadwing wrote in post #17270564 (external link)
I honestly bought it larger so that I could get more distance between the subject and light and still have good light. I'm not sure that quite works though.

This is exactly how it works. The only bad thing would be if you want more light fall off. Essentially, the further you light is from the subject, the more evenly lit the area is, even the background. Ify ou have the light really close to the subject, the background may not show up at all in your image.


Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,181 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Cons of large modifier? (Other than size)
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1452 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.