C&C Encouraged -- Help me get better!
Natural light - Canon 5D Mark II paired with the 50mm f/1.4 shot at f/2.2 - iso 50
MikeCondax Member 206 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 More info | Nov 13, 2014 21:16 | #1 C&C Encouraged -- Help me get better! Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 135L, Canon 40D, Canon 50 f/1.4, Tokina 12-24
LOG IN TO REPLY |
texkam "Just let me be a stupid photographer." 1,580 posts Likes: 998 Joined Mar 2012 Location: Olympia, Washington USA More info | Nov 14, 2014 00:06 | #2 I would have used the 135 for this.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ranmasu Senior Member More info | Nov 14, 2014 10:30 | #3 texkam wrote in post #17271027 I would have used the 135 for this. Forgive me for asking this, I'm still trying to learn. I have the Canon 50 1.4 and the Canon 135L. Why would you have chosen to use the 135L for this as opposed to the 50 1.4?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 14, 2014 11:11 | #5 Thanks for your responses so far... I am well aware that the 135L would have been better suited but I happened to throw on the 50 1.4 to see what it could do. I actually hate the 50 1.4 so I don't use it at all. Outside of that, is there anything I could improve on to make this a "wow" image? Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 135L, Canon 40D, Canon 50 f/1.4, Tokina 12-24
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ranmasu Senior Member More info | Mike, the image you posted with the 50 1.4 still looks good to me on my laptop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pvancorb Senior Member 519 posts Likes: 32 Joined Jan 2011 More info | Nov 14, 2014 12:15 | #7 I think i would have had her turn a little more to her right. It would avoided looking at her arm pit and I think would have presented a little nicer line.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 14, 2014 12:57 | #8 pvancorb wrote in post #17271870 I think i would have had her turn a little more to her right. It would avoided looking at her arm pit and I think would have presented a little nicer line. Thanks for your input! It will help me the next time we are out! Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 135L, Canon 40D, Canon 50 f/1.4, Tokina 12-24
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smaeda Goldmember 1,384 posts Likes: 3271 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Shawnee, KS More info | Nov 14, 2014 16:12 | #9 Mike Condax wrote in post #17271746 Thanks for your responses so far... I am well aware that the 135L would have been better suited but I happened to throw on the 50 1.4 to see what it could do. I actually hate the 50 1.4 so I don't use it at all. Outside of that, is there anything I could improve on to make this a "wow" image? Why do you hate the 50 1.4? https://instagram.com/shintarodesign
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 14, 2014 17:41 | #10 smaeda wrote in post #17272288 Why do you hate the 50 1.4? I'm not a fan on my Full Frame and I don't think my copy is very sharp. Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 135L, Canon 40D, Canon 50 f/1.4, Tokina 12-24
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Nov 15, 2014 18:09 | #11 Use ISO 100 instead. 50 is only over exposed 100 by 1 stop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 716 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||