Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 15 Nov 2014 (Saturday) 16:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

front AND back focusing related to previous focus point

 
swoffa
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 15, 2014 16:21 |  #1

Hi All,
I have been having issues with my 70-200 f2.8 II missing focus quite a lot lately. I've painstakingly set, reset the MA but have ben frustrated with it missing focus. Last week I was trying to get it right again when I noticed if I focused behind the target then focused on the target it would back focus. Same thing would happen if i focused in front of the subject, the focus plane would shift forward. Not as badly as the back though.

You can see that the two focus planes don't meet.

Is this the lens having problems or could it be the body?

Here's a couple of pics. these are ~100% crops and sharpened up to about 90. These are both shot at 200mm and I was about 9meters from the target. The driveway slopes up from where I was shooting and the target was parallel to the camera. The target was vertical so was not sloping forward or backward. I used spot focus in one shot mode and focused on the bottom right hand corner of the target, just ups and left of the focal logo.

Thanks for any feedback.

Focusing behind first.

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/0Dp6UdE.jpg

Focusing in front first
IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/gkMmAHP.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,826 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 5978
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 15, 2014 16:36 |  #2

You might find the area of the focus sensor actually goes onto the drive & picks up the contrast line in the pavers - I'd be curious to see what results you get if you put your focus point smack in the middle of the focal target instead of on it's edge.


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swoffa
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 15, 2014 17:12 |  #3

Actually, the top one was in the middle of the target. This is a screen snap from DPP.

IMAGE: https://www.evernote.com/shard/s59/sh/271cee7c-935e-4fc3-9f1c-f5974cd8d4e3/e72d97f7d9b0576490361bdb1ebfb81d/deep/0/Digital-Photo-Professional-----Macintosh-HD-Users-davidwatts-Pictures-1DLSR-2014-11-08-5D3_3497.CR2--.png



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,826 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 5978
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 17, 2014 03:12 |  #4

swoffa wrote in post #17273916 (external link)
Actually, the top one was in the middle of the target. This is a screen snap from DPP.

thanks - it's often hard to tell how much of the pics are actually covered by the focus sensor & a lot of folks assume it's exactly the same size as the red box (which it isn't)
Still doesn't help your problem though - sorry!


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swoffa
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 18, 2014 03:32 |  #5

Anybody have any clues if this would be a lens or body issue?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nethawked
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 244
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Nov 18, 2014 05:46 |  #6

You might want to send both to a Canon service center for alignment. I'm detecting that this combination is the only one you're unhappy with, so it's probably the lens. Sending both in should resolve this to your satisfaction. Good luck.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bratkinson
Senior Member
643 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Western MA
     
Nov 19, 2014 06:20 |  #7

One of the MFA issues I found when using FoCal was that while my target was about 20 feet away, most of my photography is done from 50-150 feet away. What resulted was the handful of shots I shot from, say, 15-25 feet were focused right where I wanted them to be, anything beyond that distance were just a tad soft.

So, I purchased a slanted-ruler type of MFA tool and set it up in my back yard on a sunny day, about 85feet from tripod to target. The results were noticeably better. I haven't touched the MFA since.

As for perceived problems with the 70-200, I'm guessing you are shooting at a fairly close in target and setting your MFA accordingly. You may want to re-do the MFA from a longer distance. Also, does your camera allow 'wide' and 'tele' MFA settings for that lens? I set both ends on my 5Diii for all 3 of my zooms (16-35, 24-105 and 80-200) in my back yard that day.

Also, be sure to use something like f5-f8 or so when doing MFA. Most lenses are not at their sharpest at or near wide-open or stopped down to the max.


"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." General George S Patton, Jr 1885-1945

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swoffa
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 19, 2014 19:59 |  #8

Thanks for the response.

I have the 5D3 as well and have set both wide/tele as you have done. Although I have purchased the focal software I don't use it. As you may know Focal is not automatic with the 5D3. I seem to get better results when using the dot method( I think that what is known as). I just use the Focal template printed on A3 paper.

Anyway, when I first purchased the 70-200 it was amazingly sharp at any distance. I could zoom way in on images and eyelashes etc were as if they were stuck to the monitor. Gobsmackingly brilliant. Nowadays it seems everything is just off focus, sometimes a foot or two out. It pains me so.

I did shoot these at 2.8 so I might have another go at f5 or f8 as you suggest. Though I do wonder if the resultant plane will be where f2.8 is.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nethawked
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 244
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Nov 20, 2014 03:32 |  #9

DotTune.

I would give MA a try once again at a distance just beyond infinity focus at the long end. I recall reading while learning about DotTune method that this provides the most reliable reading.

I'm not sure a narrow aperture will benefit much, it seems to me you'd want the narrowest DOF. Doesn't the AF system calculate focus by taking its reading wide open anyway, regardless of set aperture?

If the lens worked well before and now is showing problems I'll go back to my original thought, it may he time for a service center visit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,577 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
front AND back focusing related to previous focus point
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1190 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.