Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 15 Nov 2014 (Saturday) 21:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

24 or 28 f2.8 IS USM ?

 
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,696 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1143
Joined Oct 2010
     
Nov 15, 2014 21:10 |  #1

I'm thinking about either the 24 f2.8 IS USM or 28 f2.8 IS USM for mostly my SL1, and some times my 6D. Since I shoot indoor events and museums, I believe the IS will be a benefit.

But there's only 4mm difference between the two lenses. 4mm doesn't seem like much. Is there a build quality or IQ difference?

Any opinions?


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 259
Joined Jun 2014
     
Nov 15, 2014 23:08 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

I looked through your car show stuff. Nice!

Anyway, I don't think either of these choices adds much to your 24-70II. As much as you are using 24mm, would 28 work for you? I notice quite a few shots at much smaller than f/2.8, too. Would you get more versatility out of something like the 16-35 f/4 IS? Zoom versatility, the IS you want, and f/4 is hurting anything when your not shooting at f/2.8 anyway. Just some random thoughts at midnight.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
melcat
Goldmember
1,122 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 15, 2014 23:36 |  #3

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #17274270 (external link)
But there's only 4mm difference between the two lenses. 4mm doesn't seem like much.

When comparing focal lengths, use division rather than subtraction. 4mm at these focal lengths is significant.

There is a different "feel" to the two focal lengths on full frame.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,817 posts
Likes: 208
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Nov 16, 2014 03:32 as a reply to  @ melcat's post |  #4

You can always crop a picture taken with a 24 mm to look like what you get with a 28 mm, but not the other way around.

I have the EF 28 mm f/2.8 IS USM myself, but I use it mainly when I want the camera to be as compact as possible (yeah, I know, with a 1DX behind the lens...), but most of the time when using focal lengths in this region I find one of three other lenses on the camera.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,729 posts
Gallery: 1114 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8155
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 16, 2014 03:38 |  #5

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #17274270 (external link)
I'm thinking about either the 24 f2.8 IS USM or 28 f2.8 IS USM for mostly my SL1, and some times my 6D. Since I shoot indoor events and museums, I believe the IS will be a benefit.

But there's only 4mm difference between the two lenses. 4mm doesn't seem like much. Is there a build quality or IQ difference?

Any opinions?

Heya,

The 28 F2.8 IS is a very good lens. It's wide on full frame, but not super wide, so it's just another "wider than 35mm" there. It's great if you care about distortion (as in, less distortion from being wide). On a crop, it's a lot like using a 40 or 50mm on your full frame in terms of field of view. Great IS.

Have you considered the 35 F2 IS though? Is it too wide?

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DoughnutPhoto
Senior Member
513 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2014
Location: the Netherlands
     
Nov 16, 2014 03:39 as a reply to  @ apersson850's post |  #6

http://www.the-digital-picture.com …8-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx (external link)

These two lenses are very close... the only thing I can come up with in addition to the link above, is that you might like the 24mm better on the SL1 than the 28mm since you seem to like wide angle lenses.
The 28mm lens will have the FOV similar to a 44mm lens on full frame - so that's nearly normal. The 24mm lens will have a FOV similar to a 38mm lens on full frame.


Canon 5d, 60d, 17-40mm L, 30mm Art, 50mm, 85mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,696 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1143
Joined Oct 2010
     
Nov 16, 2014 20:18 as a reply to  @ DoughnutPhoto's post |  #7

Thanks folks for the comments.

I think the main reason I'm looking at these two lenses is for their small size and good IQ. Small size since I'll mostly use the lens on the SL1.

Since the SL1 is a crop camera, I'm thinking the 24mm might be best. As some one said, I can always crop the image if a narrow fov is needed.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
speedync
Goldmember
1,208 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 176
Joined May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
     
Nov 16, 2014 20:27 |  #8

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #17276118 (external link)
Thanks folks for the comments.

I think the main reason I'm looking at these two lenses is for their small size and good IQ. Small size since I'll mostly use the lens on the SL1.

Since the SL1 is a crop camera, I'm thinking the 24mm might be best. As some one said, I can always crop the image if a narrow fov is needed.

This. I had the 24 on my T2i/550D, & it was excellent. I use the 28 IS far more on my 6D. Less distorted look, & sharp as. I got the old non IS 24 as a lightweight cheap wide option for the few times I use it on the 6D. The 22 pancake covers my crop needs now :) If you really want the 28, then maybe the new EF S 24 might suit. Cheap enough to own the 2.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lilkngster
Senior Member
721 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 38
Joined Sep 2010
Location: NJ
     
Nov 16, 2014 21:22 |  #9

More of a difference on a FF than a crop. I would suggest you consider basing your decision on your FF rather than the crop. Depending on your needs, even 24mm might not be wide enough on the SL1. I'd sure like an EF-S 18mm IS...

As mentioned, there are more options at the 24mm range (L, TS, Ef-s, micromotor) compared to the 28 (USM and the micromotor versions), if you were thinking of complementing, i.e. 24L with the 28IS would be more useful. I'd like to see a 28mmL as well...

Also like the idea of the Ef-s for the Sl1 and the 28 for both.


6dII/80d/1dIII|8mm to 400mm|Pro-10/100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
22,785 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 303
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Nov 16, 2014 21:23 as a reply to  @ speedync's post |  #10

28mm = cheaper, sharper, smaller. great lens that I owned for awhile but I now have 35 f2 IS.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff, sirui

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
22,785 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 303
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Nov 16, 2014 21:24 |  #11

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #17276118 (external link)
Thanks folks for the comments.

I think the main reason I'm looking at these two lenses is for their small size and good IQ. Small size since I'll mostly use the lens on the SL1.

Since the SL1 is a crop camera, I'm thinking the 24mm might be best. As some one said, I can always crop the image if a narrow fov is needed.

I'd get the new 24 efs. much cheaper and smaller but of course no IS. in fact I will get this lens for my SL1 because I use it for quick snaps like ebay.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff, sirui

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyH
Goldmember
2,089 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Aug 2009
     
Nov 16, 2014 21:40 |  #12

The 35F2 IS is great in museums, and would be perfect for both cameras. Mine is very sharp.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
17,828 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 1672
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Nov 17, 2014 00:31 |  #13

I'd go for a stabilized f2.8 17-5Xmm zoom instead


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,480 views & 0 likes for this thread
24 or 28 f2.8 IS USM ?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is macui
479 guests, 371 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.