Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 16 Nov 2014 (Sunday) 09:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Mk II - overexposure with 2x TCs

 
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Nov 17, 2014 20:00 |  #16

I believe they mean that the 50-500 only offers Manual Focus if any of the TCs are mounted.
http://www.sigmaphoto.​com/teleconverter-compatibility (external link)


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Capn ­ Jack
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,179 posts
Gallery: 2961 photos
Likes: 27753
Joined Mar 2010
Location: NE USA
     
Nov 17, 2014 20:28 |  #17

Snydremark wrote in post #17278336 (external link)
I believe they mean that the 50-500 only offers Manual Focus if any of the TCs are mounted.
http://www.sigmaphoto.​com/teleconverter-compatibility (external link)

His response makes sense in light of the link you posted. The odd thing is that the XSi I am using now does autofocus with the TC in bright light. Perhaps it isn't guaranteed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Nov 17, 2014 21:02 |  #18

Capn Jack wrote in post #17278392 (external link)
=Cap'n Jack;17278392]His response makes sense in light of the link you posted. The odd thing is that the XSi I am using now does autofocus with the TC in bright light. Perhaps it isn't guaranteed.

That's basically it. The manufacturers will state that AF isn't supported; but, by using a non-reporting TC or taping a couple of pins, people will get AF to work, after a fashion.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Nov 18, 2014 00:10 |  #19

OK guys, can we stay on topic, please? There's no issue with 1.4x TCs in the scenario this thread is about.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airbutchie
Not too crunchy
Avatar
13,415 posts
Gallery: 413 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 8782
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Monrovia, CA
     
Nov 18, 2014 09:57 |  #20

Keith R wrote in post #17277253 (external link)
Nobody else shooting with a 7D Mk II, 2x TC and third party lenses, then?

I'm shooting with a third party TC (Kenko Pro DGx) on a Canon lens... Sample image below...

IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5602/15594879489_ed79454313_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pL4Q​mz  (external link) On The Lookout... (external link) by airbutchie (external link), on Flickr

7D2 + 400 2.8L II 'non-IS' + Kenko Pro DGx 2x TC combo... And AF worked just fine...

:)

Hi. My name is Butch...
Complete Gear List | Flickr Vault (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Nov 18, 2014 10:52 |  #21

Capn Jack wrote in post #17278323 (external link)
=Cap'n Jack;17278323]No, but I got this response from Sigma today when I asked about using a 50-500 IS and my sigma 1.4 teleconvertor :

Hello Jack,
No it will not, the converter will prevent it.
Yours Truly,
Paul Pizzano
The Sigma Corp. of America


I'm still trying to understand that...

What was the exact question you asked?


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopherm
Senior Member
Avatar
313 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 912
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Norman, OK
     
Nov 18, 2014 12:27 as a reply to  @ archer1960's post |  #22

I seem to be having the same problem.
7D Mark II
Sigma 120-300 f2.8 Sport
Sigma 2x teleconverter

With teleconverter

IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5610/15636140600_1de1731d33_z.jpg

Without teleconverter or bird
IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5611/15635172539_c9c1e4d6e8_z.jpg

Gear: A lot more than I deserve and a lot less than I want!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Nov 18, 2014 13:03 |  #23

airbutchie wrote in post #17279321 (external link)
I'm shooting with a third party TC (Kenko Pro DGx) on a Canon lens... :)

Thanks.

It's third party lenses that I'm actually trying to get a handle on, but good to see that you're not affected.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Nov 18, 2014 13:07 |  #24

Christopherm wrote in post #17279606 (external link)
I seem to be having the same problem.

Yep, that's exactly what I'm seeing, Christopher.

I've already pushed this Canon (UK's) way, but it would be really helpful if someone with (say) a Tokina or Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 and a 2x on a 7D Mk II could confirm the behaviour - then Canon won't be able to push responsibility onto Sigma...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Waldemar ­ Sikorski
Goldmember
Avatar
2,746 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2009
Location: S̶o̶.̶ ̶C̶a̶l̶.̶ Poland (gates of hell).
     
Nov 18, 2014 13:30 as a reply to  @ Keith R's post |  #25

Did you push it Sigma's way?
Canon is in no way obligated to make it's cameras compatible with aftermarket products.

Example:
"Sigma has posted a statement on its website regarding incompatibilities between its lenses and the Nikon Df. As with the D5300, both autofocus and image stabilisation may not work correctly; however lenses without built-in focus motors are also affected when used on the Df. The company says it will provide free lens firmware updates to fix the issue, but this may not be possible with discontinued models."

http://www.dpreview.co​m …mpatibility-with-nikon-df (external link)


Val.
http://picasaweb.googl​e.com/sikorskienator (external link)
Picasa albums organized by bird species. (external link)
7D gripped, 40D gripped....100-400L Yes, it's taken with the Sigma 150-500.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russbecker
Senior Member
434 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 912
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Central PA, USA
     
Nov 18, 2014 13:41 |  #26

I think you will discover that all of the 2X converters that are overexposing by 2 f-stops do not report the correct aperture to the AF or metering system. They may report the correct aperture in the EXIF data.

I have a Kenko CA-F 2X Teleplus Pro 300 which behaves in exactly this fashion on both my 7D and a 7D2 that I recently evaluated. You must dial in -2 f-stops exposure compensation, the metering/exposure system thinks it is dealing with a lens that has a 2 f-stop max aperture greater than the lens+converter really has, which it is then subsequently stopping down to the the final aperture ( which isn't what is actually happening ). Hence the over exposure.

I note that a Canon 2X III used in the same situations reports the correct aperture to the metering/exposure system and does not need any compensation.

FWIW, the Kenko converter will focus with all 65 pts on the 7D2 at f/8 max real aperture. It will focus using the outer 10 pts on the 7D.


7D2 | 80D | Fuji X-H1 | Fuji GFX100S | 100-400 f/4-5.6 IIL | 300 f/4 L | 70-200 f/2.8 IIL | 135 f/2 L | 85 f/1.8 | 100 f/2 | 60 f/2.8 macro | nifty-fifty | 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 | Fuji XF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 | Fuji GF 50mm f/3.5 | Sigma 30 f/1.4 | Neewer X 25mm f/1.8 | Neewer X 32mm f/1.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Nov 18, 2014 13:59 |  #27

Waldemar Sikorski wrote in post #17279750 (external link)
Did you push it Sigma's way?

Not yet - as I've clearly explained, I'm trying to establish whether only Sigma lenses are affected.

Canon is in no way obligated to make its cameras compatible with aftermarket

Guess you don't live in the UK, then. In the UK, "merchantable quality" is a legal right; and any product which does not function properly in "reasonably typical" usage circumstances - and working properly with aftermarket lenses (as the camera's predecessors all do) qualifies - would push very hard against that right.

Furthermore, for Canon knowingly to deliver a change which - it might argued - prevents reasonable use of third party lenses, could be construed as a "restrictive practice". Of course they haven't done this - it's just a bug - and now they know about it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Nov 18, 2014 14:16 |  #28

russbecker wrote in post #17279769 (external link)
I think you will discover that all of the 2X converters that are overexposing by 2 f-stops do not report the correct aperture to the AF or metering system. They may report the correct aperture in the EXIF data.

Both of my 2x TCs report exposure data perfectly accurately when mounted (with the Sigma lenses) to my 7D and 70D bodies.

The converters haven't changed. It's the new body that's behaving differently.

I have a Kenko CA-F 2X Teleplus Pro 300 which behaves in exactly this fashion on both my 7D and a 7D2 that I recently evaluated.

Again: both of my converters work perfectly well (external link), with the Sigma lenses, on my 7D.

I note that a Canon 2X III used in the same situations reports the correct aperture to the metering/exposure system and does not need any compensation.

But which lens?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russbecker
Senior Member
434 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 912
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Central PA, USA
     
Nov 18, 2014 15:09 |  #29

Well, I can't speak for the Sigma 2X converters. I can tell you what happens with the Kenko, and what happens with the Canon 2X III ( which behaves as advertised).

I can also tell you that if I mount a lens with a f/2.8 max aperture with the Kenko 2X converter on my 7D, the AF performance becomes interesting. It will AF on all 19 pts, but the performance at the center point is problematic. If you think about it, you can see how this comes about. The Kenko 2X reports a final aperture of f/5.6 to the camera, but reports the max aperture as f/2.8. This causes the 7D to try to use its high precision f/2.8 cross point at the center with a lens that has a max aperture of f/5.6. The result is a bit erratic. If you use any other point on the 7D, it snaps into focus.

The same situation on the 7D2 gave similar results, the center AF pt behaves a bit erratically. The others are fine. To me, this is just part of trying to get more performance out of the camera system than it is specced for.


7D2 | 80D | Fuji X-H1 | Fuji GFX100S | 100-400 f/4-5.6 IIL | 300 f/4 L | 70-200 f/2.8 IIL | 135 f/2 L | 85 f/1.8 | 100 f/2 | 60 f/2.8 macro | nifty-fifty | 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 | Fuji XF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 | Fuji GF 50mm f/3.5 | Sigma 30 f/1.4 | Neewer X 25mm f/1.8 | Neewer X 32mm f/1.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Nov 19, 2014 04:25 |  #30

Thanks Russ - it's all useful input.

Could you let me know which lens(es) you're testing with? That's a big part of what I'm trying to nail down.

(Just as an aside, the 7D Mk II centre AF point works perfectly for me with a 2x and f/2.8 lens attached).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,737 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
7D Mk II - overexposure with 2x TCs
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
776 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.