It depends on what kind of Servo AF focus problems you have. So it's a bit too general a remark to be useful.
apersson850 Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | It depends on what kind of Servo AF focus problems you have. So it's a bit too general a remark to be useful. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers! ![]() More info | Nov 18, 2014 10:15 | #32 apersson850 wrote in post #17278884 ![]() You've misunderstood how AI Servo AF works. First, One Shot AF is nromally better at acquiring focus than Servo AF. That's due to the time the camera spends doing each of the measurements with the AF sensor. The 1DX camera is the first one to deviate from this, since it actually uses One Shot AF algorithms for part of the Servo AF service. These parts are those that aren't critical to maintaining the frame rate, like when tracking a subject with AF active but before the trigger button is pressed to start shooting. Thus everyone who claims Servo AF with the ability to turn it off with the AF-ON button is identical to using One Shot AF don't know what they are talking about. It may be good enough for your intended use, but identical, no. When using Servo AF and taking the first image in a sequence, the camera will behave differently depending on the focus priority setting. Release: The camera will make one single AF measurement and then drive the lens to whatever position it found from that measurement. If the measurement was correct everything is good. If it was not, the image will not be in focus. Equal: If the single AF measurement fails, the camera will make a few more attempts (Canon doesn't tell exactly how many - it probably depends on the situation) before the shutter is released. As soon as one of these measurements gave a good result, the lens is focused and the shutter is released. If after some repeated attempts there still is no valid result, it will fire anyway and the image is out of focus. Focus: The camera will make repeated attempts to measure focus, until it's successful. If never, then it won't fire either. Now this same procedure continues when taking successive images. Rename release to speed, and you can follow the same explanation. What comes in as extra sugar on the cake here is when you enable more than one AF point. If you do, then the whole battery of algorithms used to try to figure out if the subject escaped from the main AF point and, if so, where it went, comes into play between each image. All the settings used to optimize this behavior are worthy a theseis by themselves, and that's why Canon wrote the AF setup guides. I fixed the headline the way it should look on the first post, should this end up being a sticky. Thanks, Anders. Concise and clear. Canon R5, Canon 90D, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX10 IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digital paradise I still have 8 digits left ![]() More info | Nov 18, 2014 10:46 | #33 apersson850 wrote in post #17278884 ![]() You've misunderstood how AI Servo AF works. First, One Shot AF is nromally better at acquiring focus than Servo AF. That's due to the time the camera spends doing each of the measurements with the AF sensor. The 1DX camera is the first one to deviate from this, since it actually uses One Shot AF algorithms for part of the Servo AF service. These parts are those that aren't critical to maintaining the frame rate, like when tracking a subject with AF active but before the trigger button is pressed to start shooting. Thus everyone who claims Servo AF with the ability to turn it off with the AF-ON button is identical to using One Shot AF don't know what they are talking about. It may be good enough for your intended use, but identical, no. When using Servo AF and taking the first image in a sequence, the camera will behave differently depending on the focus priority setting. Release: The camera will make one single AF measurement and then drive the lens to whatever position it found from that measurement. If the measurement was correct everything is good. If it was not, the image will not be in focus. Equal: If the single AF measurement fails, the camera will make a few more attempts (Canon doesn't tell exactly how many - it probably depends on the situation) before the shutter is released. As soon as one of these measurements gave a good result, the lens is focused and the shutter is released. If after some repeated attempts there still is no valid result, it will fire anyway and the image is out of focus. Focus: The camera will make repeated attempts to measure focus, until it's successful. If never, then it won't fire either. Now this same procedure continues when taking successive images. Rename release to speed, and you can follow the same explanation. What comes in as extra sugar on the cake here is when you enable more than one AF point. If you do, then the whole battery of algorithms used to try to figure out if the subject escaped from the main AF point and, if so, where it went, comes into play between each image. All the settings used to optimize this behavior are worthy a theseis by themselves, and that's why Canon wrote the AF setup guides. I fixed the headline the way it should look on the first post, should this end up being a sticky. Hmmm. I just said that if you wanted to gaurantee focus, using Focus was probably the most logical in 1st priority. Your breakdown basically expands the manuals explanation which makes sense. I assumed that was a given so I did not go into an explanation. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digital paradise I still have 8 digits left ![]() More info | Nov 18, 2014 10:58 | #34 Just to add. I want my 5D2 to set to Focus for both. I want the first shot to be in focus and I want the camera to be re-checking focus on subsequent shots when the bride walks down the isle. For birding as long as the focus locks on I want fps to me maximized. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digital paradise I still have 8 digits left ![]() More info | Nov 18, 2014 12:05 | #35 I was thinking more about this Anders. I'm basing this on cameras that do not have 1st and 2nd priority options. AI Servo locks, continues to track and you fire away. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Well, it could be that I misunderstand your wording. I'm not a native English speaker, you know. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digital paradise I still have 8 digits left ![]() More info | Nov 18, 2014 13:29 | #37 No problem. We have had good conversations before. So 1st priority is pretty basic. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Nov 18, 2014 14:11 | #38 digital paradise wrote in post #17279749 ![]() To me focus lock and predictive focus are two different things. To me, focus lock is a focus setting that's not changing. Like when you use One Shot AF. You can then aim the camera as you like, but if it locked at three meters it stays at three meters. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digital paradise I still have 8 digits left ![]() More info | Nov 18, 2014 14:29 | #39 apersson850 wrote in post #17279824 ![]() Focus tracking is when the camera continuously updates the focus distance as new measurements of the distance to the subject brings in new data. Predictive tracking is when the camera during a sequence of distance measurements have found the subject to be approacing at a certain rate, and the camera then predicts how much the subject will move until the shutter opens after you pressed the trigger button. I meant this so I'll reword focus lock to focus tracking. It does initially have to lock on before it tracks. Just how I worded it. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | I see. Then it's like I somewhat suspected, we just used different phrases for the same thing. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 19, 2014 06:46 | #41 Great information...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digital paradise I still have 8 digits left ![]() More info | Nov 19, 2014 08:07 | #42 apersson850 wrote in post #17280919 ![]() I see. Then it's like I somewhat suspected, we just used different phrases for the same thing. ![]() Yeah, English is not you first language and I tend to write faster than I think. Not a good combination Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Must say, that the basic instruction manual that comes with this camera is a total POS. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digital paradise I still have 8 digits left ![]() More info | Nov 19, 2014 14:12 | #44 Agreed. Anders had access to some great info on the priority subject compared to the manual. Canon leaves you with trying to interpret how something works but I guess the manual would be so big it would have to come in it's own box. Trying to find the info can be frustrating. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ppmax Member 170 posts Likes: 32 Joined Feb 2009 More info | Nov 19, 2014 20:26 | #45 The customization options for this camera are awesome. Including the trigger, you can now activate one of 3 distinct shooting modes just by pressing a single button (trigger, AF-ON, *) Canon 1DX Mark II, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 IS USM Mark II, EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Nita66 778 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |