A "maybe" full frame vs "most certainly heck yes from the very first shot" use of IS..
I'll take IS 
Lightstream Yoda 14,915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Cult of the Full Frame More info | May 12, 2006 12:13 | #16 A "maybe" full frame vs "most certainly heck yes from the very first shot" use of IS..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
narlus Cream of the Crop  7,671 posts Likes: 85 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Andover, MA More info | May 12, 2006 12:18 | #17 i was very intrigued by this lens when it was announced, but just couldn't wait for the release (and the price is a bit rich for me too); maybe i'll grab one after 6-8 months time. www.tinnitus-photography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightRules Return of the Jedi  9,911 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 More info | May 12, 2006 13:13 | #18 The new 17-55IS is truly in a class by itself. There is simply nothing like it, period.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lightstream Yoda 14,915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Cult of the Full Frame More info | Lightstream wrote: A "maybe" full frame vs "most certainly heck yes from the very first shot" use of IS.. I'll take IS *smacks self*
LOG IN TO REPLY |
motion_projekt Goldmember  2,469 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Lightstream wrote: *smacks self* This must be retribution for supporting EF-S. There was no such thing as having to worry about full frame on the horizon yesterday for me. Today there is.  Fortunately fStopJojo's sig has just reminded me that it is possible to, uhh, "modify" a 17-85. Must think about doing that. so you're saying since you'd take apart the 1785IS you'd do the same to the 1755IS? Thats crazzzzzy...lol. I still like the 16-35 better...esp if you have the 2470L and the 70200ISL...it'd make more sense... EOS 5Dmk3x2 | 24L | 50L | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2006 23:57 | #21 Definitely the IS Canon 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dockie Hatchling 1 post Joined May 2006 Location: Manila, Philippines More info | May 17, 2006 08:30 | #22 i just bought the lens, and i love it! i believe it is truly a league of its own. for one it is IS and also, it is 2.8. As for the 16-35, i think it falls short on the long end and is without IS. the built is definitely not L, but sturdy enough. for the price it should have at least better build and weatherproofing, although i got it at promo price of just about $1000. happy!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lightstream Yoda 14,915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Cult of the Full Frame More info | motion_projekt wrote: so you're saying since you'd take apart the 1785IS you'd do the same to the 1755IS? Thats crazzzzzy...lol. I still like the 16-35 better...esp if you have the 2470L and the 70200ISL...it'd make more sense... I chickened out, I decided to buy the 24-105, therefore eliminating the need to perform surgery on either EF-S lens to 'adapt' it to my 5D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1311 guests, 153 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
