Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 18 Nov 2014 (Tuesday) 23:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Frequency Separation Retouching

 
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,580 posts
Likes: 998
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Nov 18, 2014 23:26 |  #1

Exploring Frequency Separation Retouching. I was happy with the results. Here's the tutorial I was following: http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=ldhG9fmgC7o#t​=793 (external link) There are several others.

200mm, 1/125 @ f4.5, iso 800
Yongnuo yn-560 iii through a 60" umbrella, camera right.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/11/3/LQ_699858.jpg
Image hosted by forum (699858) © texkam [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/11/3/LQ_699892.jpg
Image hosted by forum (699892) © texkam [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsmotril
Goldmember
Avatar
2,543 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 402
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Austin TX
     
Nov 19, 2014 07:51 |  #2

I like the picture and the lighting, but the overtouching looks over-cooked. There is no texture left on the skin at all. But the tonality and gradients are fantastic.


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/ (external link) --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,580 posts
Likes: 998
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Nov 19, 2014 14:41 |  #3

I like the picture and the lighting, but the overtouching looks over-cooked. There is no texture left on the skin at all. But the tonality and gradients are fantastic.

I included a before so you can see how much texture I began with. Yes, I see what you're saying and you can certainly dial it back if wish. I just chose not to for this exercise. Happy to have one more thing to add to my pp toolbox. Since posting I have discovered there are other threads on this technique here.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
richfell
Member
Avatar
249 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 46
Joined Apr 2007
     
Nov 19, 2014 19:05 |  #4

I think you need a different face to experiment with this technique, the one you have here is too perfect :D


Rich

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
humbleraghav
Member
31 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2011
     
Nov 19, 2014 19:42 as a reply to  @ richfell's post |  #5

Slightly overtouched...but otherwise great shots!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,580 posts
Likes: 998
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Nov 20, 2014 00:06 |  #6

I think you need a different face to experiment with this technique, the one you have here is too perfect

I think she's very pretty and love the eyes. I would like to try this technique on a subject with more skin texture and with different lighting to really see how it works. Also, this photo had more noise than I really wanted. A cleaner original would have probably shown more texture.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bystander
Member
32 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Nov 20, 2014 00:42 |  #7

I think the left pic still looks better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Nov 20, 2014 00:54 as a reply to  @ bystander's post |  #8

I think there is a time and place for frequency separation. Looks like you have it down but this is not the type of image i would do it on. Looks out of place to subject matter. High end very formal potraits and fashion shots are where FS shines.

Just my .o2 cents


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,580 posts
Likes: 998
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Nov 20, 2014 01:58 |  #9

Here's a dialed back version. Thanks for the CC.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/11/3/LQ_699939.jpg
Image hosted by forum (699939) © texkam [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lbcyalater
Senior Member
Avatar
988 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 90
Joined Oct 2006
     
Nov 20, 2014 13:32 |  #10

bystander wrote in post #17282832 (external link)
I think the left pic still looks better.

I could be wrong but the left side actually looks like the after...?

Also, I love phlearn


The Gear:
Canon 6D
Canon 17-40L :: Nifty Fifty :: Canon 85 1.8
580 EX II
http://lbcyalater.zenf​olio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsmotril
Goldmember
Avatar
2,543 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 402
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Austin TX
     
Nov 22, 2014 00:17 |  #11

hudge wrote in post #17282349 (external link)
I think you need a different face to experiment with this technique, the one you have here is too perfect :D

Looking again at the "before", I tend to agree!


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/ (external link) --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,580 posts
Likes: 998
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Nov 22, 2014 01:02 |  #12

Would love to see some more extreme before and after examples of this technique if anyone has any to share.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ross13
Member
151 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2012
     
Nov 22, 2014 13:54 |  #13

texkam wrote in post #17286468 (external link)
Would love to see some more extreme before and after examples of this technique if anyone has any to share.

Here you go.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/11/4/LQ_700097.jpg
Image hosted by forum (700097) © ross13 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/11/4/LQ_700098.jpg
Image hosted by forum (700098) © ross13 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ross13
Member
151 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2012
     
Nov 22, 2014 15:53 as a reply to  @ ross13's post |  #14

Better yet.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/11/4/LQ_700106.jpg
Image hosted by forum (700106) © ross13 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/11/4/LQ_700107.jpg
Image hosted by forum (700107) © ross13 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IShootThings
I thought I was special.......
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 26
Joined May 2009
Location: North Cali
     
Nov 22, 2014 15:59 |  #15

Wow. I guess it's time to learn something new. This technique is pretty awesome. Great job guys.


Canon 5D3, Canon XTI (IR converted), 24-70 f2.8L, 16-35 f4L, 50 1.4, 70-200 f2.8L, 100 2.8 macro, 430 ex & 580 exII speedlights.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,580 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Frequency Separation Retouching
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1692 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.