Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 23 Nov 2014 (Sunday) 16:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Singh-Ray 10, 15, or 20 stop ND Filter recommendation?

 
sml
Senior Member
Avatar
511 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
     
Nov 23, 2014 16:57 |  #1

I have several Singh-Ray filters and I am very happy with them. So, now I intend to purchase a 10 or 15 stop circular ND filter for verryyy long exposures. Still trying to decide...and now I see they JUST came out with a 20 stop filter! wow.
My inclination is to get the 10 stop and add my Vari-ND to that if I find I need additional stops. Or, am I better off just getting the 15 stop? That is, will I find that I'll eventually "want" a 15 stop if I get the 10? And is there any justification for the 20 stop...I'm thinking that's not for me.
Does anybody have any experience specifically with the Singh-Ray 10 and 15 stop ND filters who could help me with this decision?
Thanks!


Steve L
5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 24mm f1.4L II, 50mm f1.2L, 85mm f1.2L II, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 17-35mm f2.8 L, 24-105mm f4 L, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II L, 75-300mm f4-5.6 IS. Canon 600EX-RT, ST-E3-RT. Gitzo 2531, RRS BH-40 Ballhead.
www.stephenmlevinphoto​s.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frank ­ H
Senior Member
Avatar
650 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2010
Location: San Diego 229
     
Nov 23, 2014 18:05 |  #2

I've done few-minute exposures with a 10 stop (B+W). I dont see any reason to add more stops unless you need to do 'verryyy' long exposures during the bright daylight.


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Nov 23, 2014 20:58 |  #3

Frank H wrote in post #17289208 (external link)
I've done few-minute exposures with a 10 stop (B+W). I dont see any reason to add more stops unless you need to do 'verryyy' long exposures during the bright daylight.

Agreed.. I couldn't imagine a use for 15+ stops unless you really wanted to do something crazy during bright noon sunlight.. A 20 stop would be all but useless in the brightest of light (unless you wanted in increase ISO..)

Consider that dropping a shutter speed of 1/1000 to 1 seconds is 10 stops.. 15 stops would put you at 35 seconds, and 20 stops would be 1,000 seconds.. that's over 16 minutes long.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Nov 23, 2014 21:39 |  #4

I can't imagine going to 20 stops. I've shot in the middle of the day with 12 stops and felt I could use just one more stop, but that was about it. Be that as it is, I think I'd rather start with a 10 stop. I've used my screw on 10 stop in conjunction with my LB color combo to get about 12 stops. If you already have a vari-nd then getting a 10 stop will give you about 18 stops assuming you're not using an UWA lens. ;)


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
511 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
     
Nov 23, 2014 23:05 as a reply to  @ Scatterbrained's post |  #5

Thanks SO much! I really do appreciate the responses.
As I had thought, the 10 stop is likely the way to go. The replies confirm that. I'm going to put in my order for that filter.
(I've got lots of ideas of where I want to try using it...)


Steve L
5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 24mm f1.4L II, 50mm f1.2L, 85mm f1.2L II, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 17-35mm f2.8 L, 24-105mm f4 L, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II L, 75-300mm f4-5.6 IS. Canon 600EX-RT, ST-E3-RT. Gitzo 2531, RRS BH-40 Ballhead.
www.stephenmlevinphoto​s.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Nov 25, 2014 06:13 |  #6

Steve,
I too am a Singh Ray fan. I have a several of their filters in my bag. If you haven't already seen it, I recommend also looking at the new-this-year Hitech Firecrest 16-stop ND filter. It's very affordable and has very impressive color integrity (which is probably why you're looking at Singh Ray to start with). I think you should get that 10-stop you've decided on, but maybe consider the inexpensive Firecrest 16-stop as a nice complement.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 871
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Nov 25, 2014 10:43 |  #7

16 stop is very interesting for day time shooting. My recent shot:

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7558/15616363747_d4abdfcae3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pMXW​SP  (external link) Untitled (external link) by syamastro (external link), on Flickr

Check this link for ideas what 16-stop ND can do:

https://fstoppers.com …-16-stops-nd-filters-3907 (external link)

I have three filters (3, 6 and 10 stops), which give me all the flexibility I need. I heard variable ND filters can produce an ugly artifact (black cross) when used on UWA lenses - perhaps not all brands.

With 16-stop I can get to ~5 minutes day time exposure around f11-f16. WIth 20-stop ND you would be able to get to 1 hour and more day time exposure. I am sure there are some interesting opportunities for those kinds of exposures, but it might be rather challenging technically (probably need to use an external power; a very long wait - for the shot, and the same time after the shot if you want a clean photo, with long exposure NR on).

6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Nov 25, 2014 10:50 |  #8

^Very cool!!


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfarina
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1028
Joined May 2013
     
Nov 25, 2014 12:43 |  #9

David Arbogast wrote in post #17292321 (external link)
^Very cool!!

Indeed!!


Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
EF 40 | EF 70-300L | FD 35 Tilt-Shift
FE 16-35 | FE 28 | FE 90
CV 15 4.5 III | CV 40 1.4 MC | Summilux 50 ASPH
Website (external link) | 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
511 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
     
Nov 28, 2014 09:15 |  #10

Hmm....I'll take a look at the Firecrest, too. As you said, it might be a nice complement to the 10 stop.
Thanks!


Steve L
5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 24mm f1.4L II, 50mm f1.2L, 85mm f1.2L II, 100mm 2.8 Macro, 17-35mm f2.8 L, 24-105mm f4 L, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II L, 75-300mm f4-5.6 IS. Canon 600EX-RT, ST-E3-RT. Gitzo 2531, RRS BH-40 Ballhead.
www.stephenmlevinphoto​s.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 28, 2014 11:08 |  #11

Sweet lord, 20 stops?

I have a 10 stop and have stacked two 3 stops on that, for 16 stops. It's crazy how dark it is. You can go for several minutes in super bright light. Or in just good light, you can do a super long exposure. Depends on what you goal is. I've yet to need more than 10 minutes, ever, even when trying to get cloud blur. So I've not needed more than my 10 stop and a few 3 stops to stack depending on my needs.

I don't think you'll need more than 10 stop, plus or minus one other filter to fine tune the time.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 871
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Nov 28, 2014 13:45 |  #12

I agree 20 stop is very niche, but can imagine some uses: e.g. using with fast primes wide open during daytime: you can get both nice cloud blur (5-10 minutes) and shallow DoF. Never seen examples of such, you might try to be the first one :) .


6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike-DT6
Goldmember
Avatar
3,963 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: The Jurassic Coast, Dorset, England.
     
Nov 29, 2014 13:57 |  #13

How many stops is a lens cap? You could try one of those! :lol:


Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 29, 2014 14:12 |  #14

Mike-DT6 wrote in post #17299794 (external link)
How many stops is a lens cap? You could try one of those! :lol:

Haha, so true.

Then gain, a pinhole lens cap is usually around f45...

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,324 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Singh-Ray 10, 15, or 20 stop ND Filter recommendation?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1227 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.