Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
Thread started 24 Nov 2014 (Monday) 15:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Markins vs RRS Lever Quick Release

 
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Nov 24, 2014 15:44 |  #1

I'm adding to my collection of Markins ball heads with the Qi20 and the BV-22 gimbal attachment. Deciding on which lever QR to get.

I have an RRS lever QR on another ballhead, and a Markins lever QR on my travel tripod. I'm a fan of the RRS QR but have had no problems with the Markins QR which is a newer device on the market than the RRS. Neither QR has been a problem for me.

All my L brackets are made by RRS. Just wondering whether anyone has experienced any problems over time with the Markins lever QR. which would tilt me to staying with the RRS.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 24, 2014 16:23 |  #2

Not problems, per se, but I don't like that it's an "all-or-nothing" lever clamp whereas the RRS lever has a mid-point detent. It's also difficult to adjust if you do have several makes of A-S compatible plates to deal with. I swapped the Markins lever clamp onto my Flashpoint head which is about my 3rd tier head; I've got RRS lever clamps on the Q10, BH40 and BH55.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jlt23
Senior Member
498 posts
Likes: 85
Joined May 2010
Location: Tustin, CA
     
Nov 24, 2014 16:31 |  #3

I have both and prefer the RRS. I agree with Jon regarding the mid-point detent. I also feel it takes me a little longer to take the camera off the Markins because of the two pop up stops.


James

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeetsukumaran
Senior Member
316 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2007
     
Nov 24, 2014 17:30 |  #4

tvphotog wrote in post #17290928 (external link)
I'm adding to my collection of Markins ball heads with the Qi20 and the BV-22 gimbal attachment. Deciding on which lever QR to get.

I have an RRS lever QR on another ballhead, and a Markins lever QR on my travel tripod. I'm a fan of the RRS QR but have had no problems with the Markins QR which is a newer device on the market than the RRS. Neither QR has been a problem for me.

All my L brackets are made by RRS. Just wondering whether anyone has experienced any problems over time with the Markins lever QR. which would tilt me to staying with the RRS.

Good news and bad news.

Good news: your choice is actually simple.

Bad news: you have no choice if you want to use the BV22.

I have the RRS lever clamp on my BH-40.

I also recently got the Markins Q-20i + BV 22.

The RRS lever will NOT close on the BV 22. Yes, it is the newer B2 AS II. Yes, I know RRS says it will work on a wider variety of plates, and specifically mentions Markins. And yes, it actually works on the other Markin's lens plates that I have. But it will not close on the BV 22. It does not even make it to the halfway point. I applied a lot of pressure (i.e., well beyond normal), and could not get it to close: the BV 22 is simply too wide.

I ended up going with the (Markins) screw knob. The RRS lever release is nice, but a screw knob release is not that much more clumsier or slower and not at all less secure, and, in my mind, the ability to use any plate without any issues, either now or two decades from now, beats the minor disadvantage in convenience.

(Of course, given that the Markins lever release requires a screw to be adjusted to accommodate different sized plates, I would not pick that over the RRS lever or any screw-knob release under any circumstances.)

Now here is some great news: the Q20i + BV-22 make for a really, really, really, really, really, nice system! I do not know if you have used any other Markins, but the Q-20i is my first Markins, and wow! It is simply in another class than the BH-40. I know RRS gets a lot of cult-like love. And maybe I would sing a different tune if I had the BH-55 instead of the BH-40. But, in my estimation, while the BH-40 is a (very) good ballhead, the Q-20i is a functional work of art, with almost magical buttery, smoothness and rock-solid strength packaged in a gorgeous body that could easily sit on a pedestal of the Guggenheim.


Gallery: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jeetsukumaran/ (external link) Website: http://jeetworks.org/ (external link) Canon 6D, Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21, EF 24-70 f/2.8L II USM, EF 40mm f/2.8 STM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blanex1
Senior Member
Avatar
790 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2012
     
Nov 24, 2014 18:16 |  #5

i was going to get the markins QR plate to use on my travel tripod,but went with RRS and there screw release clamp as i all ready have there lever clamp on my BH-55,my thinking is i'll get finer adjustments with there screw clamp using all there plates! i like to keep it all in the same family regarding clamps/plates,its just hard on the pocket book !and markins isn't much cheaper ether .


canon 7d bg-e7 5d-mk3 1d-mk3 24-105-L 17-40 L 35/1.4 85/1.8 yougnuo 565 ex 580 ex and lots of other canon stuff.canon 70-200 2.8 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peter_n
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Boston, USA
     
Nov 25, 2014 11:40 |  #6

I'm a huge fan of the Markins screw clamps but I also have to admit that their dovetail has a slightly different angle to all of the plates I have including Wimberley. I've never used Markins plates but I'm told by a support expert that their plates are also dimensionally unique, I think they're thinner than most.

I'm not a fan of the Acratech "double speed" screw clamps as I much prefer a fine thread on the knob shaft. I'm now using Acratech and RRS lever clamps with plates from 6 different manufacturers. The RRS clamps I have feature a self-adjust mechanism which works very well on all my plates, but then so do the Acratech clamps although they are not auto-adjusting designs.


~Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Nov 25, 2014 11:47 |  #7

I use the Q20 w/ Markins lever QR and haven't had any problems with it. If I'm using a 'standard' QA plate it is the Markins plate for that lens, but I mostly just use the Capture Clip plates on all my gear and it works great. Haven't used any of the RSS stuff, so I can't compare the two.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blanex1
Senior Member
Avatar
790 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2012
     
Nov 25, 2014 12:23 |  #8

i have a question to ask, as i was shopping around for the makins Q-20 in the e-bay used dept. they don't have any ! and i noticed there's vary little price change regarding there Q-10 or Q-20 or even the Q-3 traveler ball heads,e-bay seems to have all the other one's up for sale like RRS kirk ent. even acratech,but no makin's!do the owners of these ball heads just keep them for life time ! i do see that some of there prices for a new Q-20 is though the roof,just saying "


canon 7d bg-e7 5d-mk3 1d-mk3 24-105-L 17-40 L 35/1.4 85/1.8 yougnuo 565 ex 580 ex and lots of other canon stuff.canon 70-200 2.8 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Nov 25, 2014 14:04 |  #9

Thanks for all the input. I decided after discussion with Steve at Markins and someone at RRS to buy the clamp with the Quick-turn knob. I watched a YT video where the Markins rep was comparing the lever to the Quick turn knob release. It took him exactly the same time to release them both.

Because I carry my tripod on my shoulder with the lens attached, I want all the security I can get and the knob wins over either lever.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Nov 25, 2014 14:48 |  #10

Being that you already have both and experience with them I would have thought youd be able to answer your own questions better than any of us could have... But being that you ended up with a screw clamp I guess it was a neither in the end.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Nov 25, 2014 15:01 |  #11

ben_r_ wrote in post #17292716 (external link)
Being that you already have both and experience with them I would have thought youd be able to answer your own questions better than any of us could have... But being that you ended up with a screw clamp I guess it was a neither in the end.

Yes, true. But I was sure there were people out there that had had the Markins and the RRS QR's over a longer use period than I.

It's funny though that I ultimately decided on neither.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeetsukumaran
Senior Member
316 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2007
     
Nov 25, 2014 15:02 |  #12

tvphotog wrote in post #17292730 (external link)
Yes, true. But I was sure there were people out there that had had the Markins and the RRS QR's over a longer use period than I.

It's funny though that I ultimately decided on neither.

... but did go with the screw-knob which I suggested after going through the same experience as you!


Gallery: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jeetsukumaran/ (external link) Website: http://jeetworks.org/ (external link) Canon 6D, Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21, EF 24-70 f/2.8L II USM, EF 40mm f/2.8 STM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Nov 25, 2014 15:03 |  #13

jeetsukumaran wrote in post #17292733 (external link)
... but did go with the screw-knob which I suggested after going through the same experience as you!

That's correct and your description was very helpful.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sawsedge
Senior Member
Avatar
853 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 108
Joined Dec 2011
Location: United States
     
Nov 27, 2014 21:08 |  #14

It is obviously too late to be useful for the OP, but I had a Kirk screw knob for years (older, slower, finer thread), which was great. It held things very tightly, never had an accident, nor any worries, even without safety stops (it pre-dated those designs). My gripe was that it was slow, and became annoying once I finally got an L-bracket.

So then I rented a Markins Q20i with lever release, and realized all my old Kirk plates had different widths. I'd have to buy all new plates to make the Markins work.

I tried the newer Kirk fast screw knob and didn't feel safe with it. I thought it was way too fast and too easy to release, returned it. It also pushed the plates out of level with respect to the clamp, making the bubble level useless.

I ended up with a RRS LRII clamp, which is self-adjusting. All of my old plates fit tightly. I have tried with all my strength to push the plates out once locked. Not a one budges. I think that's as good as it gets.


- John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peter_n
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Boston, USA
     
Nov 28, 2014 22:05 |  #15

sawsedge wrote in post #17296829 (external link)
I ended up with a RRS LRII clamp, which is self-adjusting. All of my old plates fit tightly. I have tried with all my strength to push the plates out once locked. Not a one budges. I think that's as good as it gets.

Same experience here with that RRS clamp.


~Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,280 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Markins vs RRS Lever Quick Release
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1225 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.