Fujifilm X-E2, reviewed by sega62

sega62 wrote in post #17302169
Great little camera to carry anywhere.
The af is good, but not for every situation, i was meant for non moving subject.
The quality in raw is really nice.lot better than jpeg.
Wanna travel lite, go with a mirroless.

I've had the X-E1 and X100 and found the opposite to be true with regard to raw vs jpeg. To my eyes the Fuji jpeg engine is one of the most compelling reasons to choose one of their cameras.

Hmmmm,
When i post process with lightroom, i found a lot of posterization with jpeg photos.
And when shooting raw its non existent.
That is why I prefer raw over jpeg.
But yes the jpeg looks fine, when processed its a different animal.

mpix345 wrote in post #17308182
I've had the X-E1 and X100 and found the opposite to be true with regard to raw vs jpeg. To my eyes the Fuji jpeg engine is one of the most compelling reasons to choose one of their cameras.

This was pretty much my experience as well. Have been very impressed with Fuji JPEG's, from both an X-E2 and X100S.

I agree for great looking pics with JPEG BUT BUT BUT
If you use Raw it will be lot simpler to POST Process without loosing important data.
For me its a game player, I was about to let it go, but now i am thinking of putting more money in another lens.
The only thing I would love is a bigger viewfinder when shooting!