Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
Thread started 01 Dec 2014 (Monday) 23:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND Reservoir Dog (showing now: Reservoir Dog)
Overall Rating8
Overall Image Quality8.5
Value for Money7
Bokeh8
Sharpness8.5
Contrast8.5
Focusing7.5
Must Have5
Suitability to Intended Use9.5
Got What I Expectedn/a
not rated
image
photo by Adrian
Ownership Status: "own"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, reviewed by Reservoir Dog

 
Reservoir ­ Dog
A Band Apart
Avatar
3,278 posts
Gallery: 469 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 421
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Out of the pack
     
Dec 01, 2014 23:01 |  #1

It's a very long time a have it now, and still unhappy this pump system vmad
What was thinking the engineers which develop this lens ??? seriously the most un-ergonomic IMO (total opposite to ergonomic) lens i ever used !
Anyway, i use it at 99% at 400mm.

Image quality is very good, sharp, plenty of contrast, the AF can be quite slow some time, but very accurate and spot on
There is an urban legend about getting some dust inside, personally i don't have dust inside after ... a decade may be.

I just regret to not have bough the prime 400mm f/5.6 instead, because whatever you are thinking > you will be most of the time at 400mm, and even often it's too short.


150 Free online photos editing application (external link) / 100 Free Desktop Photo Editor Software (external link) / Free Photography eBooks (external link) / My photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
alexvtr
Member
49 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Montreal, QC
     
Dec 02, 2014 07:46 |  #2

Reservoir Dog wrote in post #17303191 (external link)
It's a very long time a have it now, and still unhappy this pump system vmad
What was thinking the engineers which develop this lens ??? seriously the most un-ergonomic IMO (total opposite to ergonomic) lens i ever used !
Anyway, i use it at 99% at 400mm.

Image quality is very good, sharp, plenty of contrast, the AF can be quite slow some time, but very accurate and spot on
There is an urban legend about getting some dust inside, personally i don't have dust inside after ... a decade may be.

I just regret to not have bough the prime 400mm f/5.6 instead, because whatever you are thinking > you will be most of the time at 400mm, and even often it's too short.

I agree with you... I never got used to the pump system. And for the times you quickly need something between 100 and 400, it's difficult to reach the length needed with precision. I always ended overshooting what I wanted. Lots of wasted time having to zoom back to 100, recompose and re-zoom because the zoom system isn't as smooth as a regular zooming mechanism.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
6,715 posts
Gallery: 238 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 7874
Joined May 2008
Location: Calgary
     
Dec 05, 2014 18:28 as a reply to  @ alexvtr's post |  #3

I use this lens for birding. It is a joy to use. Often it lives on my camera for weeks on end. Focus is accurate and fast.

I am used to its trombone action for zooming and like it. Once in a while I have to zoom very quickly and the tightening collar happens to be too tight and the lens won't zoom. That can be frustrating, but I don't know if there is a good solution (other than being patient and loosening the tightener). That collar serves a very useful purpose in preventing zoom creep.

I've taken thousands if not tens of thousands of pics with this lens and would look forward to taking many more with it - except I have Version II on order.


Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK
Donate to POTN here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Didereaux
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 251
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Upper Texas coast
     
Dec 05, 2014 19:03 |  #4

Archibald wrote in post #17314801 (external link)
I use this lens for birding. It is a joy to use. Often it lives on my camera for weeks on end. Focus is accurate and fast.

I am used to its trombone action for zooming and like it. Once in a while I have to zoom very quickly and the tightening collar happens to be too tight and the lens won't zoom. That can be frustrating, but I don't know if there is a good solution (other than being patient and loosening the tightener). That collar serves a very useful purpose in preventing zoom creep.

I've taken thousands if not tens of thousands of pics with this lens and would look forward to taking many more with it - except I have Version II on order.


1X I second all of that. I have it, the 70-200, and the 24-105. Shoot wildlife and birds mostly. The 100-400mm is hard to beat, and the slide action is simply a matter of using it to get used to it. If you rarely pick it up, and use the std zoom lens's then yeah, you might find it not great. But wildlife. sports shooters all seem to like it. Check out the sidelines and you'll see a lot of them.


Couple of Canon bodies, a couple of Canon lens, few gadgets all stuffed in a bag...and a stick, and a tripod.
https://www.flickr.com …ringandmontepho​tos/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reservoir ­ Dog
THREAD ­ STARTER
A Band Apart
Avatar
3,278 posts
Gallery: 469 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 421
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Out of the pack
     
Dec 05, 2014 22:17 |  #5

The problem is whatever how you set the ring to be smooth or stiff, it's not the same smoothness/stiffness all the way, near 100mm it a bit more loose and when you arrive near 300-400mm it's more stiff ...
When i push it, it can be ok (getting a bit stiffer is ok), but when i pull back, i "bang" always the 2 barrels !

I use it also only for birds and wildlife (a lot !), don't make me wrong the IQ is very good, surprisingly good !
But to zoom in / zoom out, it does not keep the same smoothness all the way, making this system a nightmare for me, this system oblige me to control the amount of force i need to use which is different at every focal length ...
If it was the exact same smoothness all the way, you might never read this comment, but it's not the case at all ;)

But i understand that some people like this system, the idea is good to have the fastest possible zoom in / zoom out when needed ;)


150 Free online photos editing application (external link) / 100 Free Desktop Photo Editor Software (external link) / Free Photography eBooks (external link) / My photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
10,048 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1823
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Gig Harbor, Washington
     
Dec 06, 2014 11:57 |  #6

I must be the Odd Ball. I love the push pull. Really keeps me balanced when im tracking BIF's. The 100-400 is a great lens if you have enough light


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reservoir ­ Dog
THREAD ­ STARTER
A Band Apart
Avatar
3,278 posts
Gallery: 469 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 421
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Out of the pack
Post edited over 3 years ago by Reservoir Dog with reason 'Add some pictures'. (2 edits in all)
     
Dec 06, 2014 18:53 as a reply to  @ umphotography's post |  #7

No Odd Ball, i don't like the system, others like it a lot, it's just a matter of taste ;)
I agree with you, it's a great lens, not a fast one but it's a great one which produce very nice image quality.

IMAGE: https://ppcdn.500px.org/88162241/441c85f8b611b44cfd0d0ab0e0839190166a8ee5/5.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://500px.com/photo​/88162241/  (external link)
Olive-backed Sunbird (Cinnyris jugularis) (external link) by Patrice Laborda (external link) on 500px

IMAGE: https://ppcdn.500px.org/88178563/6a2fe1383e197395c47200ed164e0da394260e79/5.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://500px.com/photo​/88178563/  (external link)
Who are you ? (external link) by Patrice Laborda (external link) on 500px


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


150 Free online photos editing application (external link) / 100 Free Desktop Photo Editor Software (external link) / Free Photography eBooks (external link) / My photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
1,627 posts
Gallery: 360 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 981
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
     
Apr 22, 2015 02:37 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

I find it a great motorsport lens. Had it around 8 years now...paper long gone and slides down to full extension all the time, but still pretty good.
Brought it new with a 7D, so pretty good reach on a crop (160-640 effective) and with the 8fps, it's a good combination for sport or movement...


IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2883/12915757734_62c1bd0b03_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/kFjC​Nb  (external link)
TND3 20 (external link) by SPD speedscene photography and design (external link), on Flickr


IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7492/15956712955_f8e13ffb0c_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qj3j​QB  (external link)
Roger 4 (external link) by SPD speedscene photography and design (external link), on Flickr

Not bad as a (slightly stalky) street lens either...

IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3730/11575714593_cdda3a2e3e_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/iCUy​E6  (external link)
2 chutes are better than 1 (external link) by SPD speedscene photography and design (external link), on Flickr


IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7706/16543074034_e8f0600be5_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rcRz​yo  (external link)
Moving in for the kiss (external link) by SPD speedscene photography and design (external link), on Flickr

7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Black ­ Bart
Member
241 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2009
     
May 03, 2015 13:07 as a reply to  @ umphotography's post |  #9

I agree I prefer the push pull over the twist type I can lay it in the palm of my hand and go from 100 to 400 and still have my arm in the same position but when I have to twist I wind up with my elbow sticking up at a uncomfortable position and have to relocate in order to hold it steady.
I leave the locking ring loose so I can instantly change it.
Most of the time I have a 1.4 tc on mine with my 1D it will still AF and the 140-560mm is great for birding.
I wish my other lens were a push pull also.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
1,627 posts
Gallery: 360 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 981
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
     
Jul 13, 2015 04:06 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

This shot is with a 2x converter on a 7D...

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7734/17843742140_6f4ac1484c_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tbMQ​Sy  (external link)
Moon 24 5 15 (external link) by Flickr Sucks (external link), on Flickr

7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregDunn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,287 posts
Likes: 126
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Indiana
     
Jul 14, 2015 17:27 |  #11

alexvtr wrote in post #17304120 (external link)
I agree with you... I never got used to the pump system. And for the times you quickly need something between 100 and 400, it's difficult to reach the length needed with precision. I always ended overshooting what I wanted. Lots of wasted time having to zoom back to 100, recompose and re-zoom because the zoom system isn't as smooth as a regular zooming mechanism.

Seems like you'd want to get focus at 400mm and then zoom out to compose; that way you'd reduce the potential focus error even if you're using AI Servo. That's how I always do with my 24-105 and 70-200.


Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reservoir ­ Dog
THREAD ­ STARTER
A Band Apart
Avatar
3,278 posts
Gallery: 469 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 421
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Out of the pack
Post edited over 3 years ago by Reservoir Dog with reason 'Add youtuvideo example'. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 14, 2015 19:01 |  #12

GregDunn wrote in post #17631714 (external link)
Seems like you'd want to get focus at 400mm and then zoom out to compose; that way you'd reduce the potential focus error even if you're using AI Servo. That's how I always do with my 24-105 and 70-200.

You cannot compare the zoom system...
The 100-400 is a zoom pump system, it have nothing to do or compare with a regular zoom system, here on the 100-400 to zoom in or out you push or pull (no ring to turn) ;)



150 Free online photos editing application (external link) / 100 Free Desktop Photo Editor Software (external link) / Free Photography eBooks (external link) / My photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ccugolf
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Apr 2015
     
Jul 16, 2015 19:17 |  #13

When mounted on a monopod I liked this for shooting lacrosse. The pump allows for much quicker zoom on moving subjects.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chaturanga
Member
58 posts
Joined Jul 2015
     
Jul 23, 2015 07:56 |  #14

Very nice photos.. Thanks for review




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Labmonkey
Member
Avatar
204 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Aug 2015
     
Sep 21, 2016 20:31 |  #15

I like the image quality of this lens, it does seem pretty sharp. The pump system takes some getting used to. Maybe I just haven't used it enough.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

12,470 views & 4 likes for this thread
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, reviewed by Reservoir Dog
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Petru
724 guests, 334 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.