Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
Thread started 02 Dec 2014 (Tuesday) 12:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND Lester Wareham (showing now: Lester Wareham)
Overall Rating9.5
Overall Image Quality9.5
Value for Money9.5
Bokeh9.5
Sharpness9.5
Contrast8.5
Focusing9.5
Must Have8.5
Suitability to Intended Use9
Got What I Expected10
image
Ownership Status: "own"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM, reviewed by Lester Wareham

 
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
26,632 posts
Gallery: 2392 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 9149
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Post edited over 3 years ago by Lester Wareham.
     
Dec 02, 2014 12:38 |  #1

Used mostly in conjunction with the 1.4xII this has been my main wildlife and birding lens for many years. Very sharp even with the 1.4X. The close focus capability makes it a good choice for the smaller wildlife subjects.
Has good manual focus control whilst maintain fast AF. For best AF with subjects outside the close focus zone use the focus limiter.
Mode 1 and 2 IS for panning but does not auto detect a tripod.

IMAGE: http://www.ware.myzen.co.uk/GalleryPics/Photos/Birds/General/Finches/birds%207D%20bullfinch%20m%20A1_005_25-05-14.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.ware.myzen.co.uk/GalleryPics/Photos/Arthropods/Dragonflies/insects%20Hairy%20Dragon%20A2_001_10-06-14.jpg

My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Dillan_K
Senior Member
Avatar
964 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 169
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Calgary Canada
     
Feb 08, 2015 18:14 |  #2

I own one too, and I find it very versatile. The close focus makes it a really nice portrait lens. Thanks for taking the time to write a review!


Gear: Canon 24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 300mm f/4L IS, 5D, Elan 7, 420EX, Metz 52 AF-1
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ahren
Member
35 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jul 2014
     
Mar 11, 2015 10:13 |  #3

I have one but it is seeing little action. Since I bought a sigma 120-300. Love the fact that you can hand hold the 300f4 more comfortably and easier.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
3,876 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 568
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Mar 11, 2015 18:39 |  #4

In my opinion the 300 F4 L IS is one of the best "Bang for Buck" lenses in any manufacturer's range. Whilst not quite perfect it offers a good focal length and aperture, very good IQ, IS, pretty quick AF in a small light package. I sold mine to help fund my purchase of the Canon 300 F2.8 L IS - but I do miss the compact size and close focus of the 300 F4.
It is simply a VERY good lens that is compact, light and relatively cheap for the quality it produces. Not much more that one could ask really!


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texaskev
Goldmember
Avatar
1,409 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 169
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Austin & Dallas Texas
     
Mar 15, 2015 05:37 |  #5

I bought mine used fairly cheap from a POTN member and use it for baseball outfield shots. Great IQ and focus is great for a long lens. Nice review, thanks!


Canon 1DX II, 1DX, 11-24 F4 L, 100 F2.8 L, 16-35 F2.8 L II, 17-40 F4 L, 24-70 F2.8 L II, 24-105 F4 L II, 70-200 F2.8 L II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Parmcat
Senior Member
Avatar
961 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 66
Joined Feb 2006
Location: London Ontario
     
Sep 28, 2015 00:18 |  #6

Hi there,

I am considering buying one of these lenses used.

I have heard that adding a 2x Tele converter will deactivate the AF. I have a 60D, and wonder if this is the case.

Thanks in advance

Parm


Canon 60D, Canon 70D
Canon 70-200 F4L...Canon 300mm F4L
Canon 18-200is...Sigma 10-20mm
Canon 380 EX
Manfrotto 679B MonoPod...Manfrotto 190B Tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
THREAD ­ STARTER
Moderator
Avatar
26,632 posts
Gallery: 2392 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 9149
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Sep 28, 2015 00:28 |  #7

Parmcat wrote in post #17724371 (external link)
Hi there,

I am considering buying one of these lenses used.

I have heard that adding a 2x Tele converter will deactivate the AF. I have a 60D, and wonder if this is the case.

Thanks in advance

Parm

The AF is a body function, using a 2x make the max aperture f/8, so a standard Canon body like your 60D will only AF to f/5.6 (1.4x converter).

A 7DII. 5DIII etc give the centre point AF f/8 however. Even then AF performance (speed and accuracy) is not so good so it would only be an Emergancy feature I think.

If you really want 600mm I would recommend the Tamron 150-600mm, this is what I am using now for birding and wildlife.


My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Parmcat
Senior Member
Avatar
961 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 66
Joined Feb 2006
Location: London Ontario
     
Sep 28, 2015 08:02 as a reply to  @ Lester Wareham's post |  #8

Just curious on th AF speed? I want the lens to shoot HS football, so the AF should be quick

Also will consider the 1.4 Tele to go with it

Thanks in advance


Canon 60D, Canon 70D
Canon 70-200 F4L...Canon 300mm F4L
Canon 18-200is...Sigma 10-20mm
Canon 380 EX
Manfrotto 679B MonoPod...Manfrotto 190B Tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
THREAD ­ STARTER
Moderator
Avatar
26,632 posts
Gallery: 2392 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 9149
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Sep 28, 2015 10:03 |  #9

Parmcat wrote in post #17724658 (external link)
Just curious on th AF speed? I want the lens to shoot HS football, so the AF should be quick

Also will consider the 1.4 Tele to go with it

Thanks in advance

The naked lens is fast, specially with the focus limited on. It has quite close focus a pseudo macro mode, so for best speed you want to keep the lens out of that region.

The 1.4 does slow it down but I would think it is ok for sports, could be faster for bird in flight.

For sport I would have thought even 300mm is long but I am not an expert, might be worth talking to other sports shooters to see what they use. A 70-200 or 70-300 might better suit if the subject distance is changing a lot.


My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
G35Driver
Goldmember
Avatar
1,430 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Fernley, NV USA
     
Nov 19, 2015 11:52 |  #10

I had this lense, love it, unfortunately had to sell it, but I miss it, maybe ill buy another one, it has very good sharpness


ll 40D ll XTI ll 17-40mm f/4L ll 50mm f1.4 ll 420EX ll
My Complete Gear List /Honolulu POTN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,899 posts
Likes: 805
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Mar 23, 2018 17:48 as a reply to  @ Lester Wareham's post |  #11

I shot sports (non-professionally) with a pair of 7D cameras wearong the 70-200mm f/4L IS and the 300mm f/L IS lenses. Pretty nice combination.

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Sports/San-Diego-Polo-Club-Del-Mar/i-tQZcDm4/0/e028fcfd/X3/Polo%20Match%20Del%20Mar_1709_edited-1-X3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com …_edited-1-X3.jpg&lb=1&s=A  (external link) on Smugmug

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Sports/San-Diego-Polo-Club-Del-Mar/i-pJSxsf9/0/3a1cf9c2/X3/Polo%20Match%20Del%20Mar_1708_edited-1-X3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com …_edited-1-X3.jpg&lb=1&s=A  (external link) on Smugmug

See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,791 views & 1 like for this thread
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM, reviewed by Lester Wareham
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is suitman1
428 guests, 323 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.