Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
Thread started 02 Dec 2014 (Tuesday) 13:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND Lester Wareham (showing now: Lester Wareham)
Overall Rating9
Overall Image Quality9
Value for Money9
Bokeh8
Sharpness8
Contrast8
Focusing8.5
Must Have8
Suitability to Intended Use9
Got What I Expected9
Ownership Status: "own"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, reviewed by Lester Wareham

 
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
26,597 posts
Gallery: 2374 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 9037
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Post edited over 3 years ago by Lester Wareham.
     
Dec 02, 2014 13:21 |  #1

Used as my standard zoom on APS-C for many years this now acts as my ultra wide lens on full frame. On full frame works well with the 24-105mm.

IMAGE: http://www.ware.myzen.co.uk/GalleryPics/Photos/Landscape/Landscape%20Stourhead%20Gardens%20091%20061106.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.ware.myzen.co.uk/GalleryPics/Photos/Landscape/Landscape%20Stourhead%20Gardens%20160%20061106%20BW.jpg

My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
3,875 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 568
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Dec 03, 2014 19:25 |  #2

I use the same combination and find that they work very well together.
One point to note is that (at 17mm) this lens distorts quite a lot. To me this is not a problem - it is a characteristic that I exploit to get dramatic perspectives on the right subject.
To me the best aspect of this lens is the way it renders colour, it is simply better (in this respect) than any other lens that I own or have (yet) tried. I am lusting after the new 16-35 F4, but if the colour isn't as good then I won't be getting one - turned down the 16-35 F2.8 L Mk2 for the same reason.


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
THREAD ­ STARTER
Moderator
Avatar
26,597 posts
Gallery: 2374 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 9037
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Dec 04, 2014 01:39 |  #3

johnf3f wrote in post #17309767 (external link)
I use the same combination and find that they work very well together.
One point to note is that (at 17mm) this lens distorts quite a lot. To me this is not a problem - it is a characteristic that I exploit to get dramatic perspectives on the right subject.
To me the best aspect of this lens is the way it renders colour, it is simply better (in this respect) than any other lens that I own or have (yet) tried. I am lusting after the new 16-35 F4, but if the colour isn't as good then I won't be getting one - turned down the 16-35 F2.8 L Mk2 for the same reason.

Hi john, do you mean the wanted/expected perspective distortion or the unwanted geometric distortions?

The latter can be corrected for you fairly automatically along with chromatic aberrations etc using DPP, I think LR might be able to do this as well.


My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
3,875 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 568
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Dec 04, 2014 17:23 |  #4

Sorry I should have been clearer in my post! I deliberately use my 17-40 at 17mm when I want to get really close to subjects yet get the whole thing in frame. I like this particularly for things like Car Shows as it can give a very dramatic and pleasing, to me, effect.
So yes I love the "wanted/expected" distortion that this lens gives, where I don't want it I simply step back a little and zoom in a little.
I also prefer to use the 17-40, rather than my 24-105 where their ranges overlap. I don't know if there is any scientific evidence to support this but I prefer the images and that's all that matters to me!

Thanks, yes I do know about the correction software available. My lens doesn't show too much chromatic aberration (but I am not a pixel peeper except on wildlife).


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wmcy
Senior Member
651 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Dec 19, 2014 23:17 |  #5

Thanks for the perspective as I recently purchased this lens.

Wm.


Canon 5D IV, Canon 24-70 f/4L IS USM, Canon 35 f2 IS, Canon 100 f/2.8L IS, Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2, 600-EX III RT Speedlite, ST-E3-RT Speedlite Transmitter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,557 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, reviewed by Lester Wareham
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is alexjmck
487 guests, 341 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.