Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
Thread started 03 Dec 2014 (Wednesday) 00:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND kawi_200 (showing now: kawi_200)
Overall Rating2
Overall Image Quality3.5
Value for Money0.5
Bokeh5
Sharpness0.5
Contrastn/a
not rated
Focusing3
Must Have0.5
Suitability to Intended Usen/a
not rated
Got What I Expected0.5
image
photo by lovemyram4x4
Ownership Status: "previously owned"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, reviewed by kawi_200

 
kawi_200
Goldmember
1,409 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Everett, WA
     
Dec 03, 2014 00:49 |  #1

Terrible lens. Not worth the money at all. I really wish I never bought it. Most reviews I have seen talk about the amazing image quality for such a cheap lens but I never got that feeling from it. I was excited to get my first fast prime and since "everyone should have a 50mm" I figured why not go for the 50mm f/1.8 II that everyone likes so much... I had my camera bag unzipped and grabbed it out of my car (OOPS!!) My XSi and 50mm went clunking to the ground, all of a 2ft drop. There lay my brand new lens on its second day of ownership, mounted to the camera and the front half elsewhere on the concrete. Forutunately it pushed back together and still worked just fine.

Overall, I was never impressed with the lens. I had some fun with it, but ended up giving it to a friend because I really didn't like it. It had its moments, but not enough to justify. If I could do it all over again, I would never have wasted money on it. Now-a-days with the 40mm pancake in Canon's line up I think the 50mm f/1.8 II should be retired or heavily updated.

Wide open performance was not very good on my copy. I had stopped down to f/4 and still didn't get a sharp picture on my XSi. It may have been something with AF missing focus, but I tried the same scene standing in place from f/1.8, f/2.8, and f/4. I didn't have any shots I was impressed with during that initial testing period. I did, however, get some shots I was happy with. The tulip in the first picture was one of the first pictures I took with the lens. It was taken about as close as I could get. I don't remeber any of the settings but it was taken with an XSi.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …Flowers/GM8T528​8-edit.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

These two shots were me testing/playing with the difference between f/1.8 and something with more DOF. This is the point when I learned about shallow DOF and subject separation. Notice the pentagon bokeh balls in the headlights of the 3rd image. Focus was on the tulip and in the 2nd picture, doesn't look very sharp to me.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …239/kawi_200/_M​G_5774.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …239/kawi_200/_M​G_5776.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

Other samples I took that I actually enjoyed.


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …wi_200/_MG_0630​-nomag.jpg (external link)
on photobucket


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …awi_200/GM8T808​0-Edit.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

5D4 or 6D2..... Waiting to find out which I buy | 8-15L |24-70mm f/4L IS | 24L II | 40mm pancake | 100L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS mk2 | 400mm f/4 DO IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
longbeachgary
Redwood Original
583 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 148
Joined Aug 2003
     
Dec 03, 2014 15:41 |  #2

The 1.8 performs great for a hundred dollar lens up until it goes crashing to the ground. Then all bets are off.


Canon 1DX, Canon 1D Mark iii, 20 F2.8, 100 F2.0, 200L F2.8, 300L F4, 400L 5.6, 17-40 F4, 24-70 F2.8L, 70-200 F2.8L, 70-200 F4 IS, and the 2nd 3rd party lens I've ever owned - Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 Sport.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kawi_200
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,409 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Everett, WA
     
Dec 03, 2014 17:10 |  #3

riveragaryj@juno.com wrote in post #17309217 (external link)
The 1.8 performs great for a hundred dollar lens up until it goes crashing to the ground. Then all bets are off.

Haha, indeed. But I still feel the 40mm pancake is the new "must have" first prime. It may not be very fast, but it is very good and well worth the money.


5D4 or 6D2..... Waiting to find out which I buy | 8-15L |24-70mm f/4L IS | 24L II | 40mm pancake | 100L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS mk2 | 400mm f/4 DO IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hang ­ your ­ cross
Senior Member
Avatar
707 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 25
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Kingston, NY
     
Dec 03, 2014 22:10 |  #4

I absolutely hate this lens (Then again, I became spoiled with a 50L). I just ordered a 40mm to see if I like that any better than the nifty-fifty. Let's see if it's worth it to spend an extra $50.


Some of my feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,727 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, reviewed by kawi_200
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is brotherbear86
870 guests, 361 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.