Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
Thread started 04 Dec 2014 (Thursday) 20:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND kawi_200 (showing now: kawi_200)
Overall Rating8.5
Overall Image Quality9.5
Value for Money10
Bokeh9
Sharpness8
Contrast9
Focusing10
Must Have8.5
Suitability to Intended Use10
Got What I Expected10
Ownership Status: "previously owned"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, reviewed by kawi_200

 
kawi_200
Goldmember
1,409 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Everett, WA
Post edited over 3 years ago by kawi_200.
     
Dec 04, 2014 20:05 |  #1

I loved the 17-40L. It was my absolute favorite lens. The only reason I sold it was because I all but stopped using it when I got the 24L II. I mainly focus on landscapes for my photography and the 17-40L with its cheap price and excellent quality (both build and image) made it an instant smash hit in my backpack. The MFD is pretty close and at 40mm you can get some interesting perspective shots close up. I never noticed much issues with the sharpness of the lens as people usually comment on, but I never really look that hard at the photos either. I try to edit the colors and contrast how I want them and then resize for web viewing. This tends to reduce image quality and sharpness anyway. I was shooting JPEG while I had the 17-40L and didn't start shooting RAW until after I moved on to other lenses, because I bought LR5 at the same time as some new lenses. This was also the fastest focusing lens I have ever used. To this day I can't think of a lens that impressed me on AF speed like this lens did.

In the search for an ultra wide angle lens? The 17-40L is worth a look. Even with the new 16-35L lenses available, the low price point of the 17-40L makes it a fantastic contender for the UWA in your photo bag. And I can say the weather sealing works great! I've use it with my 5D2 at a giant rapid waterfall and in the rain, and really all around the Cascade mountains without any issues. If you haven't used an UWA and are thinking about getting one, go rent/borrow/look at the 17-40L. It is certainly worth a look.

This first example is of a lady bug at the MFD. Very small target, but it includes so much background making (for me) a very interesting take on an otherwise bland subject matter.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …239/kawi_200/GM​8T9349.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

This was also MFD on a mossy railing.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …239/kawi_200/IY​1Y0343.jpg (external link)
on photobucket


A few smaple lanscapes I have while driving around and taking pictures. The first picture does not do the lens justice. I just previewed the image and scaled down to 533x800 doesn't show the true sharpness the 17-40L is capable of. It lost a lot of detail.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …0Mountains/_MG_​0692-1.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …d%20Skylines/_M​G_2361.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …0Skylines/Sunse​tBlend.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

I'm not 100% if this was taken with the 17-40L, but I think it was.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i257.photobucke​t.com …d%20Skylines/_M​G_3980.jpg (external link)
on photobucket

5D4 or 6D2..... Waiting to find out which I buy | 8-15L |24-70mm f/4L IS | 24L II | 40mm pancake | 100L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS mk2 | 400mm f/4 DO IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zackmassey
Member
53 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2010
     
Dec 08, 2014 10:56 |  #2

If money wasn't the issue would you still pick this over the 16-35?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kawi_200
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,409 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Everett, WA
     
Dec 08, 2014 13:48 as a reply to  @ zackmassey's post |  #3

If I were in the market today and money was no object, I would be looking at the 16-35L IS. With the newer lens glass formula and IS I think it would be my choice. I haven't looked at other lens offerings from Sigma, Tamron, or Tokina.


5D4 or 6D2..... Waiting to find out which I buy | 8-15L |24-70mm f/4L IS | 24L II | 40mm pancake | 100L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS mk2 | 400mm f/4 DO IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PBaker
Member
44 posts
Likes: 13
Joined May 2009
     
Dec 30, 2014 15:26 |  #4

I added this lens to my full-frame kit. I love how wide this goes... perfect for landscapes!


6D & 60D | 24-105 f4 L | 17-40 f4 L | 50 f1.8 | 70-200 f2.8 L II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gary88
Goldmember
Avatar
3,991 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 242
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jan 16, 2015 10:20 |  #5

I've had my 17-40 for almost 8 years now, hands down my most used lens. The contrast and color it produces is stunning.


www.garyhebdingjr.com (external link)|Flickr  (external link)IGear List|Alamy | (external link)Instagram: @garyhebding

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,873 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, reviewed by kawi_200
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is David_G
898 guests, 408 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.