Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 23 Feb 2006 (Thursday) 02:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do not tilt a Speedlite??

 
clicky
Member
123 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Feb 23, 2006 02:22 |  #1

I do alot of interiorshots with my EOS 1D mk II and Speedlite 550EX. Most of the time I use manual settings (ISO 250 Av 5.6 Tv 1/50) with Speedlite bounced in ceiling. This works very well most of the time but when I use the same settings and tilt my camera upright (also turning flash towards ceiling) in "portraitmode" the flash blows away the image completely (to get a descent image I have to use up to f/8 and 1/500...) If I turn my camera again and reshoot the exposure is just fine with 5.6 1/50. Why is this? Does the metering get tampered in upright mode?


EOS 1D Mark II | EF 17-40 f4/L | EF 50 f/1.4 | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS| 1.4X TC | 550EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 23, 2006 02:43 |  #2

My speedlites (550, 580) work fine regardless of the orientation, as far as I can see. Can you post a couple of examples (one good, one bad) with EXIF info embedded to show us what you mean?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clicky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
123 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Feb 23, 2006 03:16 |  #3

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


Make = Canon
Model = Canon EOS-1D Mark II
Exposure Time = 1/25"
F Number = F5.6
Exposure Program = Manual
ISO Speed Ratings = 400
Shutter Speed Value = 4.63 TV
Aperture Value = 5 AV
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Metering Mode = CenterWeightedAverage
Flash = Flash fired, compulsory flash mode
Focal Length = 17mm
Exposure Mode = Manual exposure
White Balance = Auto white balance
Scene Capture Type = Normal

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


Make = Canon
Model = Canon EOS-1D Mark II
Exposure Time = 1/25"
F Number = F5.6
Exposure Program = Manual
ISO Speed Ratings = 400
Shutter Speed Value = 4.63 TV
Aperture Value = 5 AV
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Metering Mode = CenterWeightedAverage
Flash = Flash fired, compulsory flash mode
Focal Length = 17mm
Custom Rendered = Normal process
Exposure Mode = Manual exposure
White Balance = Auto white balance
Scene Capture Type = Normal

EOS 1D Mark II | EF 17-40 f4/L | EF 50 f/1.4 | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS| 1.4X TC | 550EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 23, 2006 03:26 |  #4

That's very odd, sorry but I have no idea what's going on. I was going to say try the internal flash but not so much on the 1 series ;)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clicky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
123 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Feb 23, 2006 03:30 |  #5

Odd indeed, now I know why my hair's getting thinner... :-)


EOS 1D Mark II | EF 17-40 f4/L | EF 50 f/1.4 | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS| 1.4X TC | 550EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
akiwi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,903 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Munich, Germany
     
Feb 23, 2006 06:31 |  #6

Could it be that the light coming out of the flash is more directionally focused in the vertical plane than in the horizontal. Therefore when the camera is horizontal & the flash is tilted up, the light is truley focused on the celing, however when the camera is in portrait & the flash tilted towards the celing, a lot of direct light from the flash is sent to the subject. Try ponting it directly up instead of at an angle.
On the other hand the ETTL should compensate for this.


Peter
www.PeterHansenPhoto.d​e (external link)
Gear:: Canon 7D & 350D :: EF 24-70 F2.8L :: EF-s 17-85:: 50mm 1.8 ::70-200 F4L ::100 F2.8 Macro:: Sigma 10-20 :: 580EX:: Elinchrom studio lights:: loads of other bibs & bobs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 23, 2006 15:12 |  #7

Have a look at the ambient exposure on the right of the picture - the 2nd is properly exposed for the ambient light but not for the stairs. What happens if you use spot metering on the stairs?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clicky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
123 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Feb 23, 2006 16:38 |  #8

Not sure that would help, I've used centerweighted average on both and the amount of light is much alike on the two shots...?


EOS 1D Mark II | EF 17-40 f4/L | EF 50 f/1.4 | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS| 1.4X TC | 550EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 23, 2006 17:18 |  #9

Yeah but i'm all out of ideas apart from that.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Feb 23, 2006 17:48 |  #10

I wonder...does this happen all the time in portrait mode or just this once? Could it just be a fluke?


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_48
Goldmember
Avatar
2,068 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Brookfield, MA
     
Feb 24, 2006 06:07 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #11

Do you have the off camera flash extension cord so you can rotate either the camera or flash one at a time to see if the off exposure is a function of the flash or the camera? Maybe you've tried this already.


Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Feb 24, 2006 06:13 |  #12

Looks to me like the metering's just being performed for the room in the back on the second shot, and the flash is blasting away at the stairs. In vertical position without a bracket, the preflash wouldn't hit the area to the right of the stairs so much because the stairs are blocking the "view".


Then again...the preflash should technically underexpose the shot from hitting the white stairs first.

Wierd.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Feb 24, 2006 15:24 |  #13

Don't know why the second is overexposed. Might be a loose contact on the flash shoe, causing the flash output to max out. Give FEL a try, or put the flash on M. If it's still different, I have no idea.
I do see a hard shadow on the second, indicating that direct flash is hitting the subject?


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
::John::
Cream of the Crop
8,644 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 364
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Canberra, Australia
     
Feb 24, 2006 15:29 |  #14

um

Try the same shot tilting the camera clockwise instead of counted-clockwise.. ?

I suspect the metering, also, and by trying it that way you may pick up a different perspective.


I am the proud owner of the Peleng 8mm Fisheye lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 03, 2006 13:30 as a reply to  @ clicky's post |  #15

clicky wrote:
Not sure that would help, I've used centerweighted average on both and the amount of light is much alike on the two shots...?

CWA is biased toward the "bottom" of the frame (as seen in landscape mode); If you turned the shutter-release end of the camera up for the landscape, that area would fall on the hallway and back room, so it'd try to give that more illumination.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,161 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Do not tilt a Speedlite??
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1058 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.