Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
Thread started 05 Dec 2014 (Friday) 14:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Slow Write Speeds with Long Exposures

 
Ynot
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
     
Dec 05, 2014 14:26 |  #1

I have two 16GB Lexar Pro's, one 400x and the other 600x. When I shoot long exposures (30 sec - 1 minute) my 7D says BUSY when it's writing. Today I was using the 600x and it was taking up to almost a minute to write, in the mean time losing shots at sunrise. Is this normal for the speed of this card? Should I consider a 1000x card? Will it make much difference? And is there really a difference between the 1000x and the 1066x cards?

Thanks


Tony
My Gear
Governments don't live together, people live together...Ӕ
Outlaw Josey Wales

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harm
License to kill... a thread
Avatar
48,725 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Jan 2008
     
Dec 05, 2014 14:28 |  #2

I only use the Sandisk Extremes. They never take that long to write to the card a 30s shot will take moments, a 10 minute shot will not take a minute to write... Not sure if that is a lexar issue, or whether you are storing RAW + Jpeg (that would double your write time)?


SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14872
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 05, 2014 14:31 |  #3

Ots not the card, its the processing by the camera if you have long exposure noise reduction turned on it uses a dark frame to rduce noise. I dont want to attempt to describe the process but the processing rakes approximately the same rjme as your exposure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harm
License to kill... a thread
Avatar
48,725 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Jan 2008
     
Dec 05, 2014 14:33 |  #4

gonzogolf wrote in post #17314284 (external link)
Ots not the card, its the processing by the camera if you have long exposure noise reduction turned on it uses a dark frame to rduce noise. I dont want to attempt to describe the process but the processing rakes approximately the same rjme as your exposure.

I was thinking that as well, but he did say "sunrise", so i thought it probably wasn't that..


SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ynot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
Post edited over 8 years ago by Ynot.
     
Dec 05, 2014 15:44 |  #5

Thanks, that was it.

Just checked my settings:

"Long Exp. noise reduction
2: On

Since I haven't tested, would it be just as effective to turn NR off and apply it later in PP? Other suggestions?


Tony
My Gear
Governments don't live together, people live together...Ӕ
Outlaw Josey Wales

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14872
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 05, 2014 16:08 as a reply to  @ Ynot's post |  #6

You likely dont need it for longish exposures with lots of color snd detsil. It helps a lot on astro-Photography and shots where a good part of the scene is black. Try a shot both ways to see if it matters.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 05, 2014 16:42 |  #7

Ynot wrote in post #17314456 (external link)
Thanks, that was it.

Just checked my settings:

"Long Exp. noise reduction
2: On

Since I haven't tested, would it be just as effective to turn NR off and apply it later in PP? Other suggestions?


It could help some - you can take a blank frame of the typical exposure length (or several of different lengths), invert them and merge them with the original photos. That's what LENR does, and why it takes so long (each exposure is followed by a phantom black exposure of the same duration and the two are sandwiched to cancel out any hot spots. But LENR isn't quite the same as regular post-processing NR, which tries to identify odd pixels based on what's around them.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ynot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
     
Dec 05, 2014 17:31 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #8

Thanks all. I've turned it off for now. You've also reminded me how it was set in the first place. A couple months ago I took an astro photo workshop where we were told to turn LENR on. Guess I forgot that it was set.

How does LENR work on non-long exposure shots?


Tony
My Gear
Governments don't live together, people live together...Ӕ
Outlaw Josey Wales

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14872
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 05, 2014 17:32 |  #9

Ynot wrote in post #17314694 (external link)
Thanks all. I've turned it off for now. You've also reminded me how it was set in the first place. A couple months ago I took an astro photo workshop where we were told to turn LENR on. Guess I forgot that it was set.

How does LENR work on non-long exposure shots?

It doesnt. It only activates on long exposures.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ynot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
     
Dec 05, 2014 17:39 as a reply to  @ gonzogolf's post |  #10

Great, thanks a bunch.

Thanks everyone!


Tony
My Gear
Governments don't live together, people live together...Ӕ
Outlaw Josey Wales

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark-B
Goldmember
Avatar
2,248 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Louisiana
     
Dec 05, 2014 21:35 |  #11

You might regret turning that feature off. You can end up with hundreds of green, red, and yellow colored pixels in your final image that will take much longer to clean in post than the extra minute you have to wait after taking the picture. I keep mine set to "auto" and the camera is generally pretty good about deciding when it is needed.


Mark-B
msbphoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ptcanon3ti
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,057 posts
Gallery: 613 photos
Best ofs: 16
Likes: 11723
Joined Sep 2012
Location: NJ
     
Dec 06, 2014 11:29 |  #12

Are you shooting RAW? Granted I don't have NR turned on in my 7D. But I do A LOT of long exposures and after a 30 second exposure it takes maybe 0.25 seconds to clear. I'm using Sandisk Extreme 60MB/s cards...nothing too fancy.


Paul
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/petshots/ (external link)
Body - Nikon D750
Lenses - Nikon 20 f1.8 / Nikon 16-35 f4 / Sigma 105 OS Macro / Sigma 24-105 f4 Art / Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC / Sigma 150-600 "S"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark-B
Goldmember
Avatar
2,248 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Louisiana
     
Dec 10, 2014 21:32 |  #13

ptcanon3ti wrote in post #17316175 (external link)
Are you shooting RAW? Granted I don't have NR turned on in my 7D. But I do A LOT of long exposures and after a 30 second exposure it takes maybe 0.25 seconds to clear. I'm using Sandisk Extreme 60MB/s cards...nothing too fancy.

If you are shooting RAW and have long exposure noise reduction turned ON, the noise reduction process should take exactly as long as the original exposure. If that is not happening, then your camera is not functioning properly. If you have long exposure noise reduction set to AUTO, then I find it only kicks in once you get to the 1 minute range.


Mark-B
msbphoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ptcanon3ti
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,057 posts
Gallery: 613 photos
Best ofs: 16
Likes: 11723
Joined Sep 2012
Location: NJ
     
Dec 10, 2014 21:35 |  #14

Mark-B wrote in post #17325668 (external link)
If you are shooting RAW and have long exposure noise reduction turned ON, the noise reduction process should take exactly as long as the original exposure. If that is not happening, then your camera is not functioning properly. If you have long exposure noise reduction set to AUTO, then I find it only kicks in once you get to the 1 minute range.

I have NR off. I can't wait 30 secs for a 30 sec. exposure. Especially when doing long exp. HDR.


Paul
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/petshots/ (external link)
Body - Nikon D750
Lenses - Nikon 20 f1.8 / Nikon 16-35 f4 / Sigma 105 OS Macro / Sigma 24-105 f4 Art / Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC / Sigma 150-600 "S"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ynot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
     
Dec 11, 2014 20:39 as a reply to  @ ptcanon3ti's post |  #15

Thanks Mark, I'll give the Auto setting a try.


Tony
My Gear
Governments don't live together, people live together...Ӕ
Outlaw Josey Wales

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,199 views & 1 like for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Slow Write Speeds with Long Exposures
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
780 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.