sirquack Goldmember  More info | Dec 07, 2014 21:57 | #1 I did not even know what these were until recently. A friend told me what they were so now I can actually post and not look foolish calling them something they are not. He/She was definitely keeping an eye on me though.   August3043.jpg by R Dean Photo, on Flickr August3044.jpg by R Dean Photo, on Flickr August3040.jpg by R Dean Photo, on FlickrName is Ron.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
2n10 Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 07, 2014 22:10 | #2 Well captured Ron. You might want to ask a mod to move this thread to the bird forum though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JMPhotos "Childhood ruined"  More info | Dec 07, 2014 23:25 | #3 Nice shot of an awesome bird. Like 2n10 mentioned above, try posting shots of birds in the BIRDS sharing section. You'll probably get more responses there and it helps keep the forum organized. Canon 6D, & Sony α6000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 10, 2014 09:39 | #4 Nice shots. It is a "he," btw. Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 10, 2014 10:16 | #5 Thanks for helping me on the sexing of he bird. There is a reference sheet at the bird blind and they did not even have the Oriole on the reference sheet. So I do know know the difference between the sexes on them. Name is Ron.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peter2516 Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 10, 2014 14:11 | #6 Nice shots Ron. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grizz Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 10, 2014 15:06 | #7 Beautiful bird shot very well. Congrats. Craig * Canon 7D Mark II * 60D * 10D * Tamron SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD * EF 400 5.6L USM * EF 17-40 4.0L USM * EF 70-210 4.0 * EF 28 2.8 * EF 50 1.8 MK1*Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 10, 2014 21:16 | #8 sirquack wrote in post #17324543 Thanks for helping me on the sexing of he bird. There is a reference sheet at the bird blind and they did not even have the Oriole on the reference sheet. So I do know know the difference between the sexes on them. The females are much duller, with an olive-yellow color typically, though there is more variation among females than males. Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 10, 2014 22:20 | #9 Thanks PKnight. I did some research when I got home from work tonight. I think I have a few of the females and never even knew what they were. I think this might be a few female Orioles based on the reference photos I have seen tonight.  November 221.jpg by R Dean Photo, on FlickrName is Ron.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2014 04:11 | #10 Great set Ron, what beautiful colours they have. Canon R6 II, RF 800mm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1449 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
