Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 14 Dec 2014 (Sunday) 21:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A Hawk: What would happen if.....

 
itw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1806
Joined Nov 2013
Post edited over 8 years ago by itw. (3 edits in all)
     
Dec 14, 2014 21:50 |  #1

This guy was 5 seconds from flight. I stuck the camera out the window and fired. I never looked at the settings until days later.

I am pleased with the shots in general but can't help but wonder what would have improved if :

I had I lowered the ISO on such a fine day ?

The high ISO caused the ridiculously high shutter speed, yes ? What gets lost with too fast of a SS ? Is there such a thing as too fast a shutter speed when shooting birds ? What are the trade offs ?

I've been advised to stop down to f 7.1 which I will in the future....... More still on a empty sky background ? What settings do you think would have been optimum and for what reasons ?

Thanks in advance !

Ted

70D / !00-400 5.6 V1 / 390 MM / ISO 800 / 1/8000 / f 5.6 / Shot in AV mode

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_703241.jpg
Image hosted by forum (703241) © itw [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_703242.jpg
Image hosted by forum (703242) © itw [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2n10
Cream of the Crop
17,097 posts
Gallery: 81 photos
Likes: 1222
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Sparks, Nevada, USA
     
Dec 14, 2014 22:01 |  #2

First photo looks like the AF was not finished. ISO 800 on the 70D should not degrade the shot by much. You are correct the high ISO caused the high shutter speed. You shouldn't lose anything with high shutter speeds. Too slow of a SS is usually a problem with birds.

1/1000 SS usually works quite well with birds. At f/8 that would get you an ISO of 200 which would have given you a cleaner image of the bird. The sky probably would have looked a little better also.


John
Equipment
My Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
banjoguns
Member
54 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Jul 2011
     
Dec 14, 2014 22:09 |  #3

Well if these are just quick shots, I think you did a pretty good job.

Now, after the fact, you can critique what may have caused a less than optimal capture. I am going to assume you were in aperture priority mode, though I don't have any reason to, its just what I use most.

ISO: 800
This could have easily been knocked down to 400 or even possibly 200. This would have reduced the noise in the sky and shadows.

Shutter speed: 1/8000
We know you could have used a lower ISO because of such a fast shutter speed. With a stationary object and an IS lens you could have easily gotten away with 1/400.

F/5.6
This is wide open for that lens at that focal length and not the sharpest. You probably would have been better around F/8


Wildlife scientist, amateur photographer.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/65799710@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1806
Joined Nov 2013
     
Dec 14, 2014 22:37 |  #4

2n10 wrote in post #17332998 (external link)
First photo looks like the AF was not finished. ISO 800 on the 70D should not degrade the shot by much. You are correct the high ISO caused the high shutter speed. You shouldn't lose anything with high shutter speeds. Too slow of a SS is usually a problem with birds.

1/1000 SS usually works quite well with birds. At f/8 that would get you an ISO of 200 which would have given you a cleaner image of the bird. The sky probably would have looked a little better also.

Thanks for confirmation John. Merry Christmas !


You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1806
Joined Nov 2013
Post edited over 8 years ago by itw.
     
Dec 14, 2014 22:45 |  #5

banjoguns wrote in post #17333015 (external link)
Well if these are just quick shots, I think you did a pretty good job.

Now, after the fact, you can critique what may have caused a less than optimal capture. I am going to assume you were in aperture priority mode, though I don't have any reason to, its just what I use most.

ISO: 800
This could have easily been knocked down to 400 or even possibly 200. This would have reduced the noise in the sky and shadows.

Shutter speed: 1/8000
We know you could have used a lower ISO because of such a fast shutter speed. With a stationary object and an IS lens you could have easily gotten away with 1/400.

F/5.6
This is wide open for that lens at that focal length and not the sharpest. You probably would have been better around F/8

Yes, I was in AV mode and the action was pretty quick, although looking at the next two pix in this series I see I had the time and presence of mind to stop down to 7.1 which brought my SS to 5000 & 3200 respectively. Both still at ISO 800 though.

Thanks for your input, comments and confirmation. I appreciate it !

Ted
8-)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_703246.jpg
Image hosted by forum (703246) © itw [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/2/LQ_703247.jpg
Image hosted by forum (703247) © itw [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Dec 15, 2014 20:38 |  #6

That full flight shot and the 2nd still shot are very good images.

Each lens is different. Experiment on still birds to find the sharpest aperture for your particular lens.

with a hawk, generally 1/1600th is fast enough even for flight stuff but 1/2500th is definitely fast enough.
Ive done quite a few at 1/1000th.

Slower SS will allow you to run a deeper aperture and lower ISO.
Looks like youre learning nicely though.
Congrats.



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1806
Joined Nov 2013
     
Dec 16, 2014 07:04 |  #7

jhayesvw wrote in post #17334988 (external link)
That full flight shot and the 2nd still shot are very good images.

Each lens is different. Experiment on still birds to find the sharpest aperture for your particular lens.

with a hawk, generally 1/1600th is fast enough even for flight stuff but 1/2500th is definitely fast enough.
Ive done quite a few at 1/1000th.

Slower SS will allow you to run a deeper aperture and lower ISO.
Looks like youre learning nicely though.
Congrats.

Thanks for the critique and buckerup Jeremy, much appreciated.

Is it too simplistic or incorrect to be thinking of it as this:

? If my SS is too fast with the aperture wide open, I'm letting in too much light but for not long enough to burn the fine details onto the sensor ? Maybe it has no bearing ?


You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 8 years ago by Left Handed Brisket. (2 edits in all)
     
Dec 16, 2014 07:48 as a reply to  @ itw's post |  #8

for the best image quality, generally the first goal is to lower ISO and let the other settings fall where they may.

with most of today's cameras, ISO 200 is really not much different than 100. Depending on the body 400 might be an almost unnoticeable difference so long as exposure is correct.

After that, stopping down your lens 1-3 stops will provide better image quality, but don't go higher or you start to face diffraction. Every lens has a different sweet spot.

once you have considered those two things let shutter speed set the exposure. If you are concerned about subject or camera movement use a faster shutter speed and sacrifice quality with higher ISO or going outside of your lens' sweetspot.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Dec 16, 2014 07:58 as a reply to  @ Left Handed Brisket's post |  #9

this is what i would have done (i'm not a birder)

your settings = 70D / !00-400 5.6 V1 / 390 MM / ISO 800 / 1/8000 / f 5.6

my adjustments = 70D / !00-400 5.6 V1 / 390 MM / ISO 200 / 1/1000 / f/8


aperture closed down a stop to get closer to the sweet spot.
ISO down two stops to give more DR and reduce sensor noise … noise destroys detail
SS down 3 stops to match other adjustments and since your subject is sitting still


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dfbovey
Goldmember
1,602 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Mar 2011
     
Dec 16, 2014 11:22 |  #10

I always shoot in manual mode Shutter speed 1/1600, f/6.3 and then adjust ISO depending on lighting.


Flickr (external link)
Canon 1D markIV - Canon 1D markIII - Canon 6D
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS - Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L - Canon EF 500mm f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1806
Joined Nov 2013
     
Dec 17, 2014 20:44 |  #11

Thanks for the baseline settings you guys.
I'll try some more experimentation and definitely stop down in a quest to find that sweet spot.

I was with a well known bird photographer this fall who also advised shooting in Manual Mode.
With a wry smile, he repeated more than once those couple of days....

"....crank up your ISO's to be sure your SS is up.
All of today's cameras can handle at least 800.
I've never been asked to give back SS"


You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
longbeachgary
Redwood Original
589 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 160
Joined Aug 2003
     
Dec 17, 2014 20:52 |  #12

Great work.


Canon R3 (2), RF85L 1.2, RF600 F11, RF800 F11, Canon 14-35L F4, Canon 1DX Mark iii, 100 F2.8 Macro, 135 F2, 200L F2.8, 300L F4, 400L 5.6, 17-40 F4, 24-70 F2.8L, 70-200 F2.8L ii, 70-200 F4 IS, 100-400 L F4.0-5.6, Tamron 150-600.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itw
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1806
Joined Nov 2013
     
Dec 17, 2014 21:01 as a reply to  @ longbeachgary's post |  #13

Thanks Mahn, I appreciate you taking the time to comment.
Seems by your tally you are a man of few words ! ;-)a makes me appreciate it all the more.

~Merry Christmas ~

Ted
8-)


You can call me Ned
Walk softly and carry a Big White lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Duane ­ N
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,075 posts
Gallery: 198 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 2219
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Chesapeake, VA USA
     
Dec 18, 2014 17:57 |  #14

The one thing I enjoy about wildlife photography is experimenting and learning from it. It's good to get advice from other photographers but keep in mind each situation is going to be different and requires different settings. With enough practice you can put yourself in the situation where you don't have to think you just react because you've been in a similar situation and know what worked and most importantly what didn't work.

I have walk around settings (1/1600" @ f/5.6, ISO 400, manual mode) I start with and adjust accordingly to what's in front of me. I will adjust any one of my settings depending on what I'm photographing and the available light. I will sometimes adjust all of them to try different things if the subject is accommodating.


www.3rdicreations.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Dec 18, 2014 18:36 |  #15

Duane N wrote in post #17340379 (external link)
The one thing I enjoy about wildlife photography is experimenting and learning from it. It's good to get advice from other photographers but keep in mind each situation is going to be different and requires different settings. With enough practice you can put yourself in the situation where you don't have to think you just react because you've been in a similar situation and know what worked and most importantly what didn't work.

I have walk around settings (1/1600" @ f/5.6, ISO 400, manual mode) I start with and adjust accordingly to what's in front of me. I will adjust any one of my settings depending on what I'm photographing and the available light. I will sometimes adjust all of them to try different things if the subject is accommodating.

Your first point is very well said, if we are not learning/enjoying then what is the point!

May base setting is not dissimilar to yours in principle. I do use M Mode but the main difference is that I use auto ISO as this means that I don't have to think too much about exposure (I don't do thinking very well!). My shutter speed is next to my thumb and my aperture is next to my index finger - the camera does the rest! Luckily I can adjust exposure compensation (in Manual mode) very quickly on my camera which is rather handy for subjects like flying birds/aircraft.


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,958 views & 2 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
A Hawk: What would happen if.....
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1665 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.