Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 15 Dec 2014 (Monday) 15:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Horse and Rider

 
Overread
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
Dec 15, 2014 15:52 |  #1

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7506/15767186110_c92e4bb200_o.jpg

Taken with Canon 7D and 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
Taken at f2.8, 1/500sec, ISO 12800.

Not sure how I feel about this shot, although part of that could be the super-high ISO (which honestly was still not quite high enough, but I wasn't willing to give up any more shutter speed and had no more aperture to play with). So a very dark indoor shot (if I recall right at this point it was basically the overhead lights only, night had fallen outside) of a moving subject.


So any thoughts on both the technical and also the general artistic aspects?

Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doogiebee
Hatchling
3 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2009
     
Dec 16, 2014 05:03 |  #2

For what it is worth, IMHO, the main negative is the rider looking away. It just doesn't do anything for me. Sorry.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Dec 16, 2014 08:14 |  #3

Overread wrote in post #17334396 (external link)
QUOTED IMAGE

Taken with Canon 7D and 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
Taken at f2.8, 1/500sec, ISO 12800.

Not sure how I feel about this shot, although part of that could be the super-high ISO (which honestly was still not quite high enough, but I wasn't willing to give up any more shutter speed and had no more aperture to play with). So a very dark indoor shot (if I recall right at this point it was basically the overhead lights only, night had fallen outside) of a moving subject.


So any thoughts on both the technical and also the general artistic aspects?

Static and distant with nothing to connect to the subject. A lower camera angle with much tighter framing and rider and mount approaching the camera position would be more interesting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,580 posts
Likes: 998
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Dec 16, 2014 08:26 |  #4

No engagement. Over sharpened.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Overread
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
Dec 16, 2014 09:30 |  #5

Thanks for the feedback guys. I agree, although I disagree. Personally I do agree that there is something missing, though I think the pose can work, but that its just that there is nothing for the subject to engage with - I suspect if there were something the top left for them to be focused upon as a second point of interest - then even if it were blurred it would still tie the shot together. At present it is indeed just sand.

Texkam what makes you think its oversharpened? I didn't think I had done so and I can't see any artifacts; so I'd be interested to hear more on what you feel makes it oversharpened.


Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,580 posts
Likes: 998
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Dec 16, 2014 23:38 |  #6

Halo between darks and lights.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
seres
Senior Member
Avatar
580 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Apr 2013
     
Dec 16, 2014 23:45 |  #7

Slightly over-sharpened, but I like the composition. The rider turned away adds mystery.


—Eric

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BornForThis
Member
Avatar
55 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Oct 2014
     
Dec 17, 2014 01:56 |  #8

I guess I'll be in the minority and say I personally like it. It may be a tad bit over sharpened but u still like it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Overread
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
Dec 17, 2014 16:46 |  #9

tex - ahh I see it now! Yes the banding is there, must have crept in when I was resizing and sharpening for web display and I just missed it!

My thanks Eric and Born - good to hear from fans of the shot ^


Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
warrenl
Junior Member
21 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2014
     
Dec 24, 2014 09:59 |  #10

it looks like the shot was taken before a dressage test started and the rider was looking over the ring.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Overread
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
Dec 24, 2014 17:12 |  #11

You'd be correct - start-up area just outside of the dressage ring - possibly watching another rider and possibly waiting for the horn/bell from the judges car (was one of hte early riders for the day but I don't think the first).


Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cleverer
Senior Member
Avatar
261 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Southern pines, nc
     
Dec 28, 2014 11:19 as a reply to  @ Overread's post |  #12

To make this more of a story, I would want you to get down lower so you are on plane with the horse and rider, and capture what it is she is looking at in the distance :)


Facebook (external link)| Web (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Exclusively Canon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Overread
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
Dec 28, 2014 12:38 |  #13

I know exactly what you mean Cleverer, but in this case I think if I got down lower I'd just be showing a very ugly grey and blue wall for the most part - outside and with more distances I can certainly envision the angle and type of story you mean - inside in this tight arena I don't think such a shot is as easily accomplished.


Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,433 views & 1 like for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Horse and Rider
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1603 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.