Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
Thread started 16 Dec 2014 (Tuesday) 08:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

HDR w/ Canon 7D - Banding in Sky

 
aaronwoodallphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,670 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 136
Joined May 2006
Location: Dark side of the Womb
     
Dec 16, 2014 08:29 |  #1

So i have been shooting HDR primarily with my Canon 5D2 over the years. Well i wanted to test out an Ultra wide and see what i thought of it. So i ordered the Sigma 8-16mm "non" fisheye to go on my crop body 7D that hasn't been getting much use lately. FF that should get me somewhere around 12-24mm give or take.

I have been shooting in a lot of different conditions and after processing a few from the 7D i have noticed in contrasty scenes that the sky had vertical lines across it. Changing lenses does not make a difference, i have the Canon 8-15mm fisheye and got the same results with it mounted to the 7D. Went back and shot a few with my 5D2 and used the same process technique and no issues with banding in the sky.

All images were shot at -2, 0, +2 / on a tripod and used the self timer.

My question, Is the 7D not capable of these style images in HDR? am i doing something wrong here?

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7493/15842702978_c3bc524798_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …woodallphoto/15​842702978/  (external link)
The College (external link) by Aaron Woodall (external link) on Flickr

[ATTACH]B[/ATTACH]

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/3/LQ_703465.jpg
Image hosted by forum (703465) © aaronwoodallphoto [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

"Only when you've learned all the rules have you earned the right to break them."
FaceBook (external link) / 500px (external link) / Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EdwardF
Senior Member
Avatar
831 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver Island, B.C.
Post edited over 8 years ago by EdwardF.
     
Dec 16, 2014 08:36 |  #2

The only other thing I would try would be to use a longer lens, such as the 24-105 and see if it continues.
If it does, I would say its in your processing thats causing the problems.

What program are you using to process your HDR images ?

I have two 7Ds and use a Canon 10-22mm lens on both, process them in Photomatix Pro, and have never had a problem with banding.


On closer inspection of those images, it looks like streak marks from the liquid used to clean your sensor,,,, is that possible ?


Canon 7D MK II, 6D. Canon 500 L, 100-400 II, 24-105, Sigma 150 Macro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaronwoodallphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,670 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 136
Joined May 2006
Location: Dark side of the Womb
     
Dec 16, 2014 08:52 as a reply to  @ EdwardF's post |  #3

these were done with photomatix also. here is a screen shot with the built in profile using monochrome preset

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/12/3/LQ_703467.jpg
Image hosted by forum (703467) © aaronwoodallphoto [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

"Only when you've learned all the rules have you earned the right to break them."
FaceBook (external link) / 500px (external link) / Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EdwardF
Senior Member
Avatar
831 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver Island, B.C.
     
Dec 16, 2014 09:00 as a reply to  @ aaronwoodallphoto's post |  #4

Does the original image (single shot), have the same streaks in it ?


Canon 7D MK II, 6D. Canon 500 L, 100-400 II, 24-105, Sigma 150 Macro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaronwoodallphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,670 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 136
Joined May 2006
Location: Dark side of the Womb
     
Dec 16, 2014 09:47 as a reply to  @ EdwardF's post |  #5

no i can't see it in the original shot. i mean i guess i could tamper with it in LR and get it to show.


"Only when you've learned all the rules have you earned the right to break them."
FaceBook (external link) / 500px (external link) / Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EdwardF
Senior Member
Avatar
831 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver Island, B.C.
Post edited over 8 years ago by EdwardF.
     
Dec 16, 2014 10:01 as a reply to  @ aaronwoodallphoto's post |  #6

Well, if its not on the original, and its not residue on the camera sensor, then my guess is something your doing differently in Lightroom.
Why not bypass Lightroom and instead process them in Photo Shop, or send them directly to Photomatix with out processing them to see if there is a difference.


Canon 7D MK II, 6D. Canon 500 L, 100-400 II, 24-105, Sigma 150 Macro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaronwoodallphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,670 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 136
Joined May 2006
Location: Dark side of the Womb
     
Dec 16, 2014 10:11 as a reply to  @ EdwardF's post |  #7

well that is directly imported to photomatix.


"Only when you've learned all the rules have you earned the right to break them."
FaceBook (external link) / 500px (external link) / Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EdwardF
Senior Member
Avatar
831 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver Island, B.C.
     
Dec 16, 2014 10:14 as a reply to  @ aaronwoodallphoto's post |  #8

Ive run out of suggestions at the moment,,,,,,, maybe someone else can solve the problem.


Canon 7D MK II, 6D. Canon 500 L, 100-400 II, 24-105, Sigma 150 Macro.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11004
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Dec 16, 2014 11:54 |  #9

Looks like classic Canon sensor banding.

My guess is that these noise artifacts are only coming from the underexposed brackets. Have a look at the underexposed raw brackets in LR and push the shadows slider all the way up to see the banding (if it's still too dark, then move the exposure slider up as well). Then use noise reduction until the banding goes away. Return the shadow slider back default and export to Photomatix. You should only need to do it on the darkest exposures.

Topaz has a denoising plugin for Photoshop that actually includes a de-banding routine. It could be an option if LR noise reduction isn't sufficient.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Post edited over 8 years ago by ejenner. (2 edits in all)
     
Dec 30, 2014 15:05 |  #10

David Arbogast wrote in post #17335980 (external link)
Looks like classic Canon sensor banding.


That was my first thought, but I wonder if it is fine enough for that - I would check by bringing out the banding on one of the originals. Also the 5DII has about the same level of banding at ISO100 as the 7D.

I must admit I don't tend to push my PP as much as this though.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,166 views & 2 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
HDR w/ Canon 7D - Banding in Sky
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1325 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.